Welcome To The 300 Club HUB On AGORACOM

We may not make much money, but we sure have a lot of fun!

Free
Message: RIO-BHP affair will surely have consequences + old border feud revisited

RIO-BHP affair will surely have consequences + old border feud revisited

posted on Jun 09, 2009 06:25PM

China's political answer to the RIO-BHP alliance is sure to steer some concern as they will surely try to make a point in the foreseeable future .

This situation revives the previous affair with Chevron a couple of years ago and shows how trades are not a matter of fairness but rather a matter of interest .

There will be consequences to that decision sooner or later China will want to get even in order to make a point and maybe avoid a repeat of this kind in the future .

That decision is sure to weigh heavily on ongoing negotions in iron ore price with China it might also affect China's steel export wich were already targeted by protectionist measures this year and may add up to protectionist concerns in future trade talks .

Tec



http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/

China concerned over Rio-BHP alliance monopoly risk

(Xinhua)
Updated: 2009-06-09 11:52


The new alliance between Rio Tinto and BHP Billiton Ltd might lead to a monopoly operation and China should be prepared for anti-monopoly measures, warned an expert.

Mei Xinyu, an economist with the Ministry of Commerce (MOC), told Xinhua Monday that China should closely watch the joint venture process of the two mining giants and be ready to work with other countries to curb market manipulation when necessary, with the help of the anti-monopoly law.

Rio Tinto scrapped the proposed $19.5 billion of investment by Aluminum Corp of China, or Chinalco, on Friday.

The company announced a cooperative venture with BHP Billiton, which would pay Rio Tinto $5.8 billion to set up a joint venture to run the iron ore resources of both companies in west Australia.

It was "something other than economic concern", said Zhang Yansheng, director of the Institute of Foreign Trade of the National Development and Reform Commission.

Almost half of China's iron ore needed to be imported, more than half of which was imported from Rio Tinto and BHP Billiton, according to Shan of CISA.

Colin Barnett, premier of Western Australia, told Australian media last Friday China was not on the list of approvals that the two companies needed to obtain.

Internationally they would need the approval of the European Union and possibly the US Justice Department, apart from investigations at nation and state level, he said.

Also, Zhang Junsheng, director of the WTO Research Institute at the University of International Business and Economics in Beijing, said China might not have a say on the issue, as neither Rio Tinto or BHP Billiton had an affiliated company in China.




Rio Tinto, BHP deal 'monopolistic', industry warns
Rio Tinto-Chinalco $19.5b deal now dead
Australia still welcomes Chinese investment: FM

An old feud we related to some time ago is resurging but does'nt seem to be of much concern as both countries have strong mutual interest to preserve peace . Tec

More India troops in disputed territory

By Zhang Haizhou (China Daily)
Updated: 2009-06-10 07:19

India is attempting to extend its control over a disputed border area also claimed by China, experts said Tuesday, in response to reports that New Delhi was deploying "thousands more troops" in parts of "Arunachal Pradesh".

Reuters quoted a "governor of the remote state" as saying India will deploy "two army divisions comprising 25,000 to 30,000 soldiers each".

"It (the deployment) was part of the planned augmentation of our capabilities to defend the country ... The increase in force strength is to meet the future national security challenge," J.J. Singh told Reuters.

The report also said New Delhi would bring more firepower into the disputed zone - adding 155 mm guns, helicopters and unmanned aircraft.

Ye Hailin, an expert in India studies with the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS), said New Delhi is strengthening its control because it "knows clearly that China will not resort to military action to solve the problem".

"India is adopting this means to make its control over the area an accepted fact," Ye said.

India and China fought a brief war over the 3,500 km Himalayan border area in 1962.

Although the neighbors signed a treaty and agreed to maintain "peace and tranquility" along the disputed frontier and also agreed to find a political solution, talks have made little progress.

"It (additional deployment) is not helpful to resolve the border dispute, and could easily cause regional tension," said Sun Shihai, who is also with the CASS.

"The chance of a border conflict is not big, if India does not instigate it," he added, noting China wants peaceful solutions through dialogue.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply