Oh, that's convenient. You can't prove it because the conspiracy controls anyone who might be able to? Well then it must be true. Of course the conspiracy doesn't control GATA, right? They're the lone exception here.

Thank you it is equally convenient to announce there is no conspiracy because no one has proven it ... exactly why I wrote what I did.

That's a bit harsh isn't it? Guy writes something you don't agree with, ergo he's part of the conspiracy? But since you can't prove it, that makes it what? An article of faith? Really, this gold suppression "theory" sounds more like a religion with each passing day.

He has made a definitive conclusion which can not be proven and his arguments are as equally weak as the one I made above for the purpose of proving how weak his is ... it is indeed convenient nothing has been proven and it isn't harsh to to judge someone who who is myopic in the viewpoint there isn't one because it hasn't been proven.

I jude people by the quality of there statements ... I get alittle uncomfortable when people see only one side of an argument.

Butler makes a good living off the gulli-bulls. I don't think you need look further than that for a motive. As for his pal Murphy, next time you see him, ask him about the CFTC fine for trading violations he got tagged with in the late 80's. Don't know about you, but one way I judge people is by the company they keep.

You'd be hard pressed to find anyone in the investment world who hasn't had dealings with some form of violation. How bout Tim Giethner for one ... old GS man who didn't pay taxes and is now the countries tax collector ... roflmao

I do not condemn people for the company they keep ... if you are so inclined to the bible ... iJesus hung aorund tax collectors and prostitutes yet ... believe him or not ... people seemed to be able to overlook that ... he has quite a following.

How about dealing with the position limit facts rather than resorting character assinations to prove a point?

orgy