Thanks very much, I will do that.

I suppose what I should be asking is was it the intention of the last drill program to define perimeter of the anomaly, and if not, how did it miss so bad? I don't want to sound too negative, I'm truly a novice at geology (I am still waiting for my Junior Geologist Adventure Club decoder ring in the mail. 4-6 weeks), seems the last results weren't good, but weren't terrible-run-for-the-hills either. I realize that they were working under the assumption there was one body instead of two, but can that really account for a lack of hits on all fronts?

Thanks for your patience.