Re: Part 2.. Sowing the Wind ... We Reap thr Whirlwind
in response to
by
posted on
Apr 11, 2008 11:06PM
The company whose shareholders were better than its management
Perhaps you missed my point & maybe I did not make my point as well as I could have. This writer picked one of the worst possible commodities to show the loss of purchasing power over this extended period. He picked a bushel of wheat which went from $1. to $12. To me, that shows how efficient farmers have become. I don't think you can find many things that have only gone up 12X over this period. The reality is everyone knows because a house has gone from $1,000. say to $500,000. is not because it is worth that much more. Everyone is aware it reflects inflation. Now if we extend a little further the reason the writer did not turn to the real estate page & mention the cost of land or housing in 1896 is because it would clearly illustrate gold was a very poor cousin to protect yourself against inflation & weaken his case for gold. History shows gold has had some great bull mkts. but gold has had extended flat to down cycles as well. IMO gold will be a poor performer compared to other investments over a 100 year period because there is no income. We are currently in a bull mkt. & that is the right time to be in gold.
Regards
Joltin