Aurelian Resources Was Stolen By Kinross and Management But Will Not Be Forgotten

The company whose shareholders were better than its management

Free
Message: OTTO'S FORSIGHT

OTTO'S FORSIGHT

posted on Jul 30, 2008 03:25PM

Is Aurelian About to Be Sold?

APRIL 09, 2008 I've had to put the insert here or I'd have a large bold font. This is old and lengthy but I've highlighted a thought Otto had early April. I wonder if Keith Barron said something to Otto re the BOD planning to sell ARU to lead Otto in this direction. If not, it was most insightful of Otto to have not only conclude this on his own, but his suspicion was strong to the extent he put it in print.

An Out of the Box Thought.

1. We might think seriously and perhaps take a vote - whatever - as to whether or not we should get our retail shares totalled. Rather than post our holding on the Board, what about pm the total we're responsible to vote, to Safe. The many pm would likely create a problem but Safe can take that up with Agracom as to a suggestion on how to best coop.

My reasons are that calls are being made to large shhldrs and if a good proximity of the nbr of shs we're representing was given, we might twig some interest or ideas from those with the same opinion ie to refrain from submitting.

2. I'm thinking too if Otto might be in contact with Keith Barron and know how one of our Leaders can contact him if they so chose to do or ... pass his nbr (with his permission) on to a Fund Mgr to discuss how THEY are going to gather some backing for their way of thinking. I don't know but if I was a Fund Mgr I might well consider phng Keith for his thoughts. Should they wish to do so, it might be nice if WE could put them in contact with Keith. He's with a couple or at least ONE Company, surely that wouldn't be hard to do. A Fund Mgr would likely prefer not to make the initial call but if we initiate it, they might think of something in discussion to block this bid. Hey! I didn't say I did this for a living!

by: Otto Rock posted on: April 09, 2008 | about stocks: ABX / AUREF.PK / AUY / BVN / GFI / GG / NEM



The news from Aurelian (AUREF.PK) Monday was that Keith Barron, co-founder and company director, was resigning. It didn't take long for the announcement to come that Barron would be taking up an advisory role at Avalanche Minerals, a small exploration-stage junior operating in Ecuador and Colombia (which promptly zoomed up 62% on that tidbit of news on Monday).

Some background on Aurelian: As everyone who follows gold stocks knows, the ARU Fruta del Norte discovery is the biggest gold thing since sliced bread, with 13.7M oz gold, and impressive grades already on the 43-101 books, with probably more to come. It is a truly mouthwatering prospect for even the biggest of the big global gold miners. But Aurelian's "El Condor" concession is more than just one single FDN deposit. In fact, it's about 95km long and 30km wide at its widest point, and holds 39 separate targets that ARU thinks are worthy of further exploration.

Which brings me to Barron. He's a real life, died-in-the-wool geologist. A pure rockman. I mean, he sits on various company boards as the geology man, with 29 years of geology under his belt in countries far and wide, has won many awards, is respected by his peers, and has a deep enough love for his chosen line to have run a website called "Straight Talk on Mining" for a number of years to freely share his knowledge with others.

If you've spent time around the breed, you'll know that business affairs bore geologists silly and all the true fanatic geo wants to do is go out poking around rocks with hammers and magnifying glasses to see what they can find. Barron in the Aurelian press release of yesterday said (and I quote):

Now we are at a juncture where the mining engineers, geo-statisticians, hydrologists, and an army of technicians take over to transform the Fruta del Norte deposit into a producing world-class gold-silver mine and make Ecuadorian history. It is normal in the course of evolution of a successful junior company for exploration to eventually yield the torch to development; most juniors never get the chance and I feel privileged and blessed. I will be most keenly following the progress of Aurelian and wish to thank the staff in Canada and Ecuador, my fellow directors, the analysts who have followed our progress, and most of all the shareholders who have supported the company and shared in its success...

But what about the rest of El Condor, Keith? If, as you rightly say, the FDN property is now moving to its next chapter, surely there's enough interest around the dozens of other target sites to keep you occupied? Doesn't any one of the other thirty-odd targets interest you? You can surely leave the development of FDN to COO George Bee and the top class team ARU has assembled to do the development, but there is plenty more for you to do on a 95km by 30km patch of world class 'elephant-hunting' terrain that you already control.......isn't there?

Barron's resignation also comes at a time when Ecuador's national assembly is about to deliver its draft constitution, due in May. Additionally, Ecuador's President Correa has been making more and more pro-mining noises, calling anti-mine protesters irresponsible and saying that responsible foreign direct investment (fiscally, socially, and environmentally speaking) is welcome in Ecuador. And, assembly spokespersons are making more miner-friendly noises about the new tax regime on mining, allaying fears that the dreaded windfall tax will nip mining development in the bud (as mentioned Monday).

Take these three points together:

  1. Barron's resignation, basically saying there's "nothing left for a pure geologist like me to do" when there are plenty of other undeveloped target sites worthy of exploration at El Condor.
  2. Barron's new job as consultant at the young and developing Avalanche, showing he's still into grassroots geology despite having made his fortune at ARU.
  3. The new mining law about to be published as part of Ecuador's draft constitution, and things suddenly looking brighter on the political will for mining and the tax burden proposals

In my personal opinion, all this points to one thing. Aurelian has already been made a serious, confidential, conditional offer by a major mining company, the condition being whether the new laws are workable and amenable large-scale mining. If the laws prove to be workable (and signs are ever more positive at the moment), then ARU will be bought out at the earliest opportunity.

Who would buy them? My best guess would be Newmont (NEM), but that's just a guess. Any of the big gold miners Barrick Gold(ABX), Goldcorp (GG), Gold Fields (GFI), etc., would be a candidate, and maybe some of the second rung gold miners would be interested, too, like Yamana (AUY) or Compania de Minas Buenaventura (BVN). But whoever buys out Aurelian and its Fruta del Norte project will surely have to pay a lot more than Tuesday's closing price of C$8.75 a share. Tuesday’s share price implies an in situ value of around U$91/oz gold, and that’s not even close to what FDN and ARU will sell for to the winning bidder.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply