Aurelian Resources Was Stolen By Kinross and Management But Will Not Be Forgotten

The company whose shareholders were better than its management

Free
Message: scotia is deeply involved in our rape bid from "K"
Reply New Message
Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message



Toronto August 19, 2008



Aurelian/Kinross



The writer holds ARU share in his RSP; I previously wrote to the OSC requesting

an urgent investigation into the proposed deal and issuance of shares ot K at a

priviledge price.



Due to public pressure, it appears ARU management decided to issue today a PR

dealing primarily with exploraton/drilling results.



Based on this new PR, it is evident now, ARU did not keep ALL their shareholders

equally informed on regular basis as I understand is required by law. Also, it is evident

that certain parties, notably Kinross, had access to priviledged and generally undisclosed

information whilst the average shareholder is expected to make decision on the proposed

takeover. To the average shareholder such action is blatantly unfair and causes

financial damage.



As ARU today issued drilling date, it is documented that additioan DD had been performed;

yet ARU elected not to disclosed such data nor to comment. Undoubtedly, Kinross have

access to such data. Specifically, drilling information is missing on DD holes including but

not limited to"

DD 207 - 209' 211, 214-216, 220-223; 228-229; 231, 233

DD 236

There is no news on regional drilling targets where saw work

There is no information on airborne geophysics performed



We have seen unreported insider sales by ARU board members that were retroactively

filed; we continue to see selective and clearly biased release of drilling information today.

As an individual shareholder, and to protect the investing public at large, and in order

to maintain the Ontario Regulators credibility I like to urge you, again, to agressively

investiage the action or inaction of the Aurelian/Kinross file; to act agressively and

decisively on the blatant misconduct of both ARU Board and Kinross towards reversal

of the entire proposed takeover deal including cancellation of shares issued to Kinross

based on apparent manipulation of exploration results, valuations and share trading prices.



It is evident there is a breach of fiduciary duties at the ARU Board; Kinross aided and abetted

such action since early 2008; the combined actions are reprehensible and immoral. Does the

OSC want to condone such action by remaing silent? We need and urgent cease and desist

order to avoid repeat of legal manoeuvering like the public has witnessed in the Drabinsky case

dating back now for more than a decade. The small shareholder would stand defenseless whilst

the attorneys argue and issue their bills at our expense.



For the sake of fairness to ALL, please do act.



Sincerely

26 Recommendations
Reply New Message
Prev Message Back To Forum Threaded View Next Message
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply