Krykuss,

you say /Safe is still here....at least his alias is./

I ask you, you only say one? hahahahahahahahaha.

It is far to easy, to make such a mistake and that is why way back I brought it up as a credibility issue in regards to those posters who did not sign there posts off. He is not the first poster on this forum who has fallen victim to this mistake hahahaha.

Like I said before, I have a reason for everthing I post.

Skylane, it seems that my numbers have gone up a little since your post. Thus my charm has not quite gone yet. However, I will say that I have never attempted to be charming on this board, I leave that to those with multiple alias's.

I have instead attempted to give good insight and correct information whether it made me popular or not. That is far more valuable when it comes to investing than charm.

It seems investors are dropping like alias's hahahahahahahaha. That is unfortunate. In my opinion there is a 50/50 chance that we get another takeover bid before the expirary of this K extension. If that does not happe then it will occur shortly after the referendum and issue of new mining laws.

Go4, you are correct, those shares that have been TENDERED and taken up by K need not be returned. However, tendering and depositing are different things in my opinion. One implies a hard lock up and the other a soft lock up. This in my opinon explains why K has only taken up 15 million or so of the 108 million shares that was initially deposited with them before the extension.

If they had all the 108 million shares tendered to them, then why did they not take them all up immediately? hahahahahahahaha.

For those legit posters, hang tough.

Regards,

F.F.