Welcome to the CMKM Diamonds Stock Hub

(Edit this Message from the "Fast Facts" Section)

Free
Message: Re: 9/2/08, SEC After NevWest Rep DARYL ANDERSON

I can see you're on top of things NICE find !!!

You can start to celebrate considering that this is a Broker that messed with the shareholders, their insurance will have to compensate us.

http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/...

Sep 02, 2008 (SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION RELEASE/ContentWorks via COMTEX) -- CMKX | Quote | Chart | News | PowerRating -- On September 2, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Notice of Hearing (Order) against Daryl Anderson (Anderson) of Las Vegas, Nevada, based on the entry of a permanent injunction against Anderson in the civil action entitled SEC v. CMKM Diamonds, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 02:08-cv-00437-LRH-RJJ in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada.
In the Order, the Division of Enforcement alleges that on Aug. 8, 2008, the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada entered a Judgment of Permanent Injunction by consent against Anderson, permanently enjoining him from violating Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act of 1933.

The Division of Enforcement further alleges in the Order that the Commission's complaint in the civil action alleges that, among other things, from March 2003 until May 2005, Anderson improperly sold more than 259 billion shares of unregistered securities of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. in 569 separate transactions, which generated more than $53.3 million in proceeds and yielded approximately $2.3 million in commissions for Anderson.

A hearing will be scheduled before an administrative law judge to determine whether the allegations contained in the Order are true, to provide Anderson an opportunity to dispute the allegations, and to determine what, if any, remedial action is appropriate and in the public interest, pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The Commission directed that an Administrative Law Judge shall issue an initial decision no later than 120 days from the date of service of the Order, pursuant to Rule 360(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules of Practice. (Rel. 34-58449; File No. 3-13156)


CMKX To DA MOON.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply