booster'

"So it appears that Gusella and Jurek may be on the same page – with regards to a covenant issue that MAY be problematic"

I respectfully beg to differ on your statement. The only thing that Jurek 's statements have in common with DG's is the recognition of a problem with the covenant. This is the difference, DG states that they COULD THEORETICALLY BE problematic..This language IMPLIES it as a possibilty....JUREK on the otherhand states that IT IS a problem, such language implies a definative, which of course he cannot for certain declare. My e-mail was sent Feb 6th, the day after the latest news release. Personally, and trust me, I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but I would tend to trust the facts being sent to me from Guseela, over the oppinions being posted by Jurek.