Re: Okay, let's think long term-here Spidey
in response to
by
posted on
Mar 26, 2010 06:32PM
Connacher is a growing exploration, development and production company with a focus on producing bitumen and expanding its in-situ oil sands projects located near Fort McMurray, Alberta
ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 March 19, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page -i- FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION ................................................................................................................. 1 ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS.................................................................................................................. 4 THE CORPORATION............................................................................................................................................... 7 Incorporation and Organization.................................................................................................................... 7 General Development of the Corporation ..................................................................................................... 7 Trends ..................................................................................................................................................... 11 BUSINESS OF THE CORPORATION.................................................................................................................... 12 Principal Properties .................................................................................................................................... 12 The Refinery............................................................................................................................................... 14 Ownership of Petrolifera ............................................................................................................................. 15 OIL, NATURAL GAS AND BITUMEN RESERVES AND RESOURCES ........................................................... 15 Oil, Natural Gas and Bitumen Reserves ..................................................................................................... 16 Bitumen Resources..................................................................................................................................... 24 DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS............................................................................................................................... 26 AUDIT COMMITTEE............................................................................................................................................. 29 Composition and Qualifications................................................................................................................. 29 Responsibilities and Terms of Reference .................................................................................................... 30 External Auditor Service Fees..................................................................................................................... 30 PERSONNEL........................................................................................................................................................... 30 DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE ......................................................................................................... 31 Common Shares ......................................................................................................................................... 31 Preferred Shares ......................................................................................................................................... 31 First Lien Notes.......................................................................................................................................... 31 Second Lien Notes ..................................................................................................................................... 32 Debentures.................................................................................................................................................. 32 CREDIT RATINGS ................................................................................................................................................ 32 PRIOR SALES ........................................................................................................................................................ 33 DIVIDEND POLICY............................................................................................................................................... 33 MARKET FOR SECURITIES................................................................................................................................. 34 TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR................................................................................................................ 34 RISK FACTORS...................................................................................................................................................... 34 Risks Relating to Economic Conditions, Commodity Pricing and Exchange Rate Fluctuations ................ 34 Risks Relating to the Great Divide Pod One Project and Algar Project...................................................... 37 Risks Relating to the Corporation's Oil Sands and Conventional Operations ............................................. 41 Risks Relating to Financing and the Corporation's Indebtedness................................................................ 43 Risks Relating to Reserves and Resources.................................................................................................. 44 Risks Relating to the Refinery..................................................................................................................... 45 Risks Relating to Third Parties.................................................................................................................... 46 Risks Relating to the Corporation's Investment in Petrolifera..................................................................... 48 Other Risks Affecting the Corporation's Business ...................................................................................... 49 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS......................................................................................................................................... 50 INTERESTS OF EXPERTS..................................................................................................................................... 50 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ............................................................................................................................. 50 Schedule A - Reports on Reserves and Resources Data by Independent Qualified Reserves Evaluator or Auditor Schedule B - Report of Management and Directors on Oil and Gas Disclosure Schedule C - Reserves Information Relating to Connacher's Equity Interest in Petrolifera Petroleum Limited Schedule D - Audit Committee Charter - 1 - FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION Certain statements in this Annual Information Form are "forward looking information" within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Forward looking information is frequently characterized by words such as "plan", "expect", "project", "intend", "believe", "anticipate", "estimate", "scheduled", "potential", or other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions "may", "should" or "could" occur. Forward looking information is based on the Corporation's expectations regarding its future growth, results of operations, production, future capital and other expenditures (including the amount, nature and sources of funding thereof), competitive advantages, plans for and results of drilling activity, environmental matters, business prospects and opportunities. Such forward looking information reflects the Corporation's current beliefs and assumptions and is based on information currently available to it. Forward looking information involves significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in the forward looking information including risks associated with the impact of general economic conditions, industry conditions, governmental regulation, volatility of commodity prices, currency fluctuations, imprecision of reserve and resource estimates, environmental risks, competition from other industry participants, the lack of availability of qualified personnel or management, stock market volatility and the Corporation's ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources, the risks discussed under "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this Annual Information Form and in the Corporation's public disclosure documents, and other factors, many of which are beyond the Corporation's control. Although the forward looking information contained in this Annual Information Form is based upon assumptions which the Corporation believes to be reasonable, the Corporation cannot make assurances that actual results will be consistent with such forward looking information. Such forward looking information is made as of the date of this Annual Information Form, and the Corporation assumes no obligation to update or revise them to reflect new events or circumstances, except as required by law. Due to the risks, uncertainties and assumptions inherent in forward looking information, prospective investors in the Corporation's securities should not place undue reliance on this forward looking information. Specific forward looking information contained in this Annual Information Form includes, among others, statements regarding: • the operation of the Corporation's facilities, including Pod One, Algar, the Refinery, and its conventional oil and gas properties; • the scope, scale and costs of the Algar Project and the timeline for completing plant construction, commissioning of the plant and steaming of the wells prior to start up of bitumen production; • the Corporation's estimated future bitumen production and the timing associated therewith; • estimates of the Corporation's reserves and resources and estimates of the present value of the future net revenue as evaluated by GLJ; • the scope of the Corporation's 2010 winter core hole and conventional drilling program; • estimates relating to the Corporation's 2010 capital expenditure budget; • the anticipated use of the Revolving Credit Facility; • the Corporation's expansion plans for its properties, including the timing thereof and the expected increases in production and revenues attributable to such expansion plans; • the Corporation's planned construction of a cogeneration facility at the Algar Project; • the Corporation's planned installation of electric submersible pumps ("
ESPs
");
• the Corporation's anticipated future maintenance and sustaining capital costs; • the Corporation's anticipated Refinery throughput and performance of the Refinery; • the Corporation's ability to market products successfully to its current and anticipated customers; - 2 - • the Corporation's expectations regarding future activity levels in the Canadian oil sands and the possible impact thereof on the price of steel and services and the availability of labour; • the Corporation's expectations with respect to trends to emerge in the Canadian oil and gas sector including consolidation activity, acquisition opportunities and asset rationalization; • the Corporation's expectations regarding the future price discount of heavy crude oil compared to light crude oil and the price of natural gas and the anticipated impact thereof on the Canadian oil and gas industry; • future regulations which may come into effect and the impact of such regulations, governmental controls and applicable royalty rates on the Corporation's operations; • the Corporation's plans for the transportation of the bitumen it produces and availability of a pipeline to transport dilbit; • the Corporation's intention to maintain financial flexibility; • the discussions regarding possible joint venture arrangements to accelerate the development of the Corporation's oil sands resources; • the Corporation's competitive advantages and ability to compete successfully; and • the Corporation's expectations regarding the development and production potential of its properties. With respect to forward looking information contained in this Annual Information Form, the Corporation has made assumptions regarding, among other things: • production rates and production decline rates; • the Corporation's ability to recover reserves; • the Corporation's ability to optimize operating costs; • future bitumen, natural gas and crude oil prices, heavy oil differentials, refining spreads, interest rates and foreign exchange rates; • future royalty and taxation rates; • the cost of expanding and maintaining the Corporation's property holdings; • well abandonment costs and salvage values; • the Corporation's ability to obtain qualified staffing and equipment in a timely and cost-efficient manner to meet its demand; • the timing for receipt of required regulatory approvals to proceed with future projects; • the timing of completion of construction, plant commissioning, commencing steaming and production from the Algar Project; • the ability to produce refined products that meet customer specifications; • the impact of increasing competition; and • the Corporation's ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms. Many of the foregoing assumptions are subject to change and are beyond the Corporation's control. - 3 - Some of the risks that could affect the Corporation's future results and could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward looking information include: • the decline of crude oil and natural gas prices; • changes in refining spreads to WTI and changes in the differential pricing between heavy and light crude oil prices; • volatility of refining gross margins, including the price of feedstocks and the prices for refined products; • inefficiencies, curtailments or shutdowns in the Refinery's operations or in pipelines used to transport crude oil to the Refinery and instability of the Refinery's throughput performance; • general economic conditions; • currency fluctuations; • difficulties encountered in delivering diluent to the Corporation's oil sands project at Great Divide and dilbit to commercial markets; • changes in, or the introduction of new, government regulations relating to the business of the Corporation; • difficulties or interruptions encountered and additional costs incurred during the production of bitumen, crude oil and natural gas; • performance and availability of facilities owned by third parties; • costs associated with producing bitumen; • timing, difficulties or delays encountered and additional costs relating to the construction of the Algar Project and the construction of future expansions; • the impact of competition; • the need to obtain required approvals and permits from regulatory authorities; • liabilities stemming from damage to the environment, accidental or otherwise; • compliance with and liabilities under environmental laws and regulations; • the uncertainty of estimates by GLJ with respect to the Corporation's reserves and resources; • changes in customer demand; • impacts of fossil fuel combustion on climate change, including potential impact on demand for the Corporation's products; • failure to obtain third party consents and approvals, when required; • changes to the royalty regime in respect of the Corporation's bitumen, crude oil and natural gas production; • the impact of amendments to the income tax laws or government incentive programs on the Corporation; • the uncertainty of the Corporation's ability to attract capital and the adequacy of the Corporation's liquidity; - 4 - • foreign, political, economic and other uncertainties that impact the price of Petrolifera shares; and • stock market volatility and the basis of market valuations. In addition, design capacity is not necessarily indicative of the stabilized production levels that may be achieved at the Corporation's SAGD facilities. Moreover, reported average or instantaneous production levels may not be reflective of sustainable production rates and future production rates may differ materially from the production rates reflected in this Annual Information Form due to, among other factors, difficulties or interruptions encountered during the production of bitumen. Actual capital costs may differ from estimates of capital costs prepared by Management in connection with construction at Algar and such differences may be material. Estimated capital costs are based on historical experience in constructing Connacher's first SAGD project at Great Divide and have been adjusted for inflation, actual expenditures incurred to date and existing contractual commitments. However, costs for and access to required labour, services and equipment, operational efficiencies or difficulties in construction and drilling, changes in scope of design and weather conditions may individually or collectively materially impact on the actual capital costs incurred in the construction of Algar. The information contained in this Annual Information Form, including the information provided under the heading "Risk Factors", identifies additional factors that could affect the Corporation's operating results and performance. Statements relating to "reserves" and "resources" are deemed to be forward looking statements, as they involve the implied assessment, based on certain estimates and assumptions, that the reserves and resources described exist in the quantities predicted or estimated, and can be profitably produced in the future. The assumptions relating to the reserves and resources of the Corporation are discussed under "Oil, Natural Gas and Bitumen Reserves and Resources - Oil, Natural Gas and Bitumen Reserves" and "Oil, Natural Gas and Bitumen Reserves and Resources - Bitumen Resources", respectively. Information contained in this Annual Information Form relating to Petrolifera, including information relating to Petrolifera's future exploration and development plans, capital expenditures and reserves and future net revenue associated therewith constitute forward looking information that has been publicly released by Petrolifera. This information is subject to change at the discretion of the Board of Directors of Petrolifera. The Corporation does not control the decisions of the Board of Directors of Petrolifera. Forward looking information is expressly qualified in its entirety by this cautionary statement. The forward looking information is only made as of the date of this Annual Information Form.
ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS
In this Annual Information Form, the terms and abbreviations set forth below have the following meanings:
"bbl"
Barrel "Mboe"
One thousand barrels of oil equivalent
"bbl/d"
Barrels per day "Mcf"
One thousand cubic feet
"boe"
Barrels of oil equivalent "Mcfpd"
One thousand cubic feet per day
"boepd"
Barrels of oil equivalent per day "Mcfe"
One thousand cubic feet of natural gas equivalent
"m"
metre "MMcf"
One million cubic feet
"km"
kilometre "MMcfpd"
One million cubic feet per day
"M$"
thousands of Canadian dollars "MMBtu"
One million British thermal units
"MM$"
millions of Canadian dollars "NGL"
Natural gas liquids
"Mbbl"
One thousand barrels "WTI"
West Texas Intermediate
Note:
For the purposes of this document, 6 Mcf of natural gas and 1 bbl of NGL each equal 1 bbl of oil. Boes may be misleading,
particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion ratio of 6 Mcf:1 bbl is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead.
"
1P
" means the proved reserve category, as defined in the COGE Handbook;
"
2P
" means the proved and probable reserve categories, as defined in the COGE Handbook;
"
3P
" means the proved, probable and possible reserve categories, as defined in the COGE Handbook;
"
ABCA" means the Business Corporations Act
(Alberta), S.A. 2000, c. B-9, together with any amendments thereto
and all regulations promulgated thereunder; - 5 - "
Algar" or "Algar Project
" means the Algar project, the Corporation's second 10,000 bbl/d SAGD bitumen facility
and wells located at Great Divide; "
COGE Handbook
" means the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook prepared by The Society of Petroleum
Evaluation Engineers (Calgary Chapter) and the Canadian Institute of Mining Metallurgy & Petroleum (Petroleum Society); "
Common Shares" or "Connacher Shares
" means the common shares in the share capital of the Corporation;
"
Connacher" or the "Corporation
" means Connacher Oil and Gas Limited and its subsidiaries, unless the context
otherwise requires; "
Connacher GLJ Report
" means the independent engineering evaluation of the crude oil, bitumen, natural gas
liquids and natural gas interests of the Corporation prepared by GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd. ("
GLJ
"),
independent petroleum engineering consultants of Calgary, Alberta, dated February 12, 2010 and effective December 31, 2009; "
Contingent Resources
" means those quantities of petroleum estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially
recoverable from known accumulations using established technology or technology under development, but which are not currently considered to be commercially recoverable due to one or more contingencies; "
dilbit
" means diluted bitumen;
"
EIA
" means Environmental Impact Assessment;
"
ERCB
" means Energy Resources Conservation Board;
"
Great Divide
" means the Divide area located in northeastern Alberta where the Corporation's Pod One and Algar
projects are located; "
Management
" means management of the Corporation;
"NI 51-101"
means National Instrument 51-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities
;
"Notes"
means collectively the First Lien Notes and the Second Lien Notes;
"
Petrolifera
" means Petrolifera Petroleum Limited;
"
Petrolifera AIF
" means the annual information form of Petrolifera for the year ended December 31, 2009 dated
March 17, 2010; "
Petrolifera GLJ Report
" means the independent engineering evaluation of the crude oil, natural gas liquids and
natural gas interests of Petrolifera prepared by GLJ, independent petroleum engineering consultants of Calgary, Alberta, dated March 5, 2010 and effective December 31, 2009; "
Prospective Resources
" means those quantities of petroleum estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially
recoverable from undiscovered accumulations by application of future development projects; "
Pod One
" means the Corporation's first 10,000 bbl/d SAGD bitumen facility and wells located at Great Divide;
"
Refinery
" means the Corporation's 9,500 bbl/d heavy crude oil refinery located in Great Falls, Montana;
"
SAGD
" means steam-assisted gravity drainage;
"
SOR
" means steam-oil ratio;
"
Sayer Energy Advisors Report
" means the independent evaluation of the undeveloped land acreage of the
Corporation prepared by Sayer Energy Advisors ("
Sayer
"), independent oil and gas advisory firm of Calgary,
Alberta, dated January 22, 2010 and effective December 31, 2009; and - 6 - "
TSX
" means the Toronto Stock Exchange.
In this Annual Information Form, references to "dollars" and "$" are to the currency of Canada, unless otherwise indicated. - 7 -
THE CORPORATION
Incorporation and Organization
The Corporation was formed on July 3, 1997 through the amalgamation pursuant to the ABCA of Petro
Power Energy Inc. and Justinian Explorations Ltd. and continued as Justinian Explorations Ltd., a public corporation
listed on the TSX Venture Exchange. On January 23, 2001 the outstanding Connacher Shares were consolidated on
a ten-for-one basis and the name of the Corporation was changed to Connacher Oil and Gas Limited. Trading in the
Connacher Shares under the symbol "CLL" commenced on the TSX Venture Exchange on March 23, 2001. This
listing was surrendered on August 1, 2003 when the Corporation graduated to and commenced trading on the TSX.
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation had four wholly-owned subsidiaries, Great Divide Pipeline
Limited and Great Divide Holding Corporation, both of which are corporations incorporated under the ABCA and
Great Divide Pipeline Corporation and Montana Refining Company, Inc. both of which are organized pursuant to
the laws of the State of Delaware. The Corporation also has a significant equity interest in Petrolifera. See
"Business of the Corporation - Ownership of Petrolifera".
The Corporation has its head and principal office at Suite 900, 332 – 6th Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta,
T2P 0B2 and its registered office at 3700, 400 Third Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, T2P 4H2.
The following chart illustrates the Corporation's organizational structure as of December 31, 2009 and the
date of this Annual Information Form:
General Development of the Corporation
Connacher is an integrated oil company, primarily engaged in the exploration for, and the development,
production and marketing of bitumen, dilbit, crude oil and natural gas, the operation of a heavy oil refinery located
in Great Falls, Montana and the marketing of associated refined products. The Corporation's principal asset is its
100 percent working interest in approximately 98,000 net acres of oil sands leases. These are primarily situated in
the Divide, Thornbury and Quigley regions and include a 50 percent working interest in the Halfway Creek region,
all southwest of Fort McMurray, Alberta. The Corporation's first 10,000 bbl/d SAGD project at Great Divide,
referred to herein as Pod One, is currently producing and the Corporation's second 10,000 bbl/d oil sands project at
Great Divide, referred to as Algar or the Algar Project, is currently under construction and anticipated to be
completed in mid-April 2010. During the past three years, the primary focus of the Corporation has been the
completion of construction, commissioning, start-up and production ramp-up of Pod One, the delineation of
additional resources to support an application to construct the Algar Project, the receipt of regulatory approvals for
the Algar Project, commencement of construction of Algar and financing activities to support the Corporation's
- 8 -
capital intensive oil sands activities. In addition, exploration and delineation core hole drilling and threedimensional
("
3D
") seismic programs have been conducted in support of plans to file an application to further
expand plant capacity at Great Divide, initially to 44,000 bbl/d. The Corporation also owns conventional producing crude oil and natural gas properties at Battrum, Saskatchewan and at Marten Creek, Gilby/Three Hills and Latornell, Alberta and an approximate 22 percent equity interest in Petrolifera, a public Canadian crude oil and natural gas production, exploration and development company active in Argentina, Peru and Colombia. The following is a general description of the development of the Corporation over the past three years. In the winter of 2007, Connacher completed an extensive and successful 81 core hole drilling and 3D seismic program on its main lease block at Great Divide, resulting in a marked expansion of its reserve and resource base and supporting Management's decision to proceed with an application for a second oil sands plant at Algar also with a design capacity of 10,000 bbl/d of bitumen. The proposed plant site is approximately eight km east of the Pod One plant. This application was submitted to regulatory authorities in June 2007. In May 2007, Connacher completed a "bought-deal" financing for $100,050,000 aggregate principal amount of convertible senior unsecured debentures due June 30, 2012. Proceeds of the offering were used by the Corporation to repay short term borrowings and to fund capital expenditure programs in respect of the development of its oil sands projects and conventional projects and the remainder was used for operating expenses. Construction at Pod One, including the drilling of 15 SAGD well pairs, was completed in August 2007, within the 300 day construction schedule and at a total capital cost of approximately $272 million, excluding approximately $25 million of sunk costs, capitalized interest and capitalized general and administrative expenses. Following plant commissioning in September 2007, Connacher commenced steam injection into the SAGD well pairs. In October 2007, Connacher delivered and sold to market its first truckload of dilbit from Pod One. In November 2007, Connacher completed a "bought-deal" financing of 10,350,000 flow-through common shares at a price of $5.00 per flow-through share. Connacher also issued an aggregate of 100,000 flow-through shares at a price of $5.00 per flow-through share pursuant to a private placement. The total gross proceeds of $52,250,000 from the financings were used to drill exploratory core holes and conduct 3D seismic to assist in the delineation of additional oil sands reserves and resources at Great Divide and Halfway Creek. In December 2007, Connacher completed the sale of US$600 million aggregate principal amount of 10.25 percent senior secured second lien notes (the "
Second Lien Notes
") due December 15, 2015, at a price of 98.657
percent, resulting in gross proceeds of approximately US$592 million (approximately $592 million). A portion of the proceeds was used to discharge Connacher's outstanding indebtedness, to fund a one-year debt service reserve account and to pay certain expenses associated with the issuance of the Second Lien Notes. The balance of approximately $327 million was added to the Corporation's working capital to fund the construction of the Algar Project. Coincidental with the sale of the Second Lien Notes, Connacher secured a new syndicated five year term revolving first lien credit facility (the "
Revolving Facility
"). The Revolving Facility was comprised of a $150
million tranche and a US$50 million tranche, with the latter for use in the business of the Refinery. In March 2009, the Corporation cancelled the Revolving Facility. Throughout 2007, a total of 1,518,267 stock options were exercised, resulting in the Corporation receiving cash proceeds of $1,466,000. In addition, 108,975 Common Shares were issued in 2007 pursuant to the Corporation's share award incentive plan for non-employee directors. On February 25, 2008 the Corporation entered into a pooling arrangement totalling 38.5 gross sections of oil sands leases in the Halfway Creek area with Alberta Oilsands Inc., an arm's length party. Under this arrangement, 15.5 sections of undeveloped and prospective lands were contributed by the Corporation and 23 sections were contributed by Alberta Oilsands Inc. The pooling arrangement provides for the joint ownership, evaluation and potential development of any resources which may be identified on the subject leases. The agreement provides for joint operatorship during the initial two years of the evaluation program, with Connacher as the designated operator of any subsequent evaluation program(s) and of any identifiable development program(s) which may occur. In 2008, a decision was made to defer exploration expenditures at Halfway Creek until the 2009-2010 drilling season, when Connacher would be the operator. - 9 - Connacher determined that Pod One achieved commerciality effective March 1, 2008. As a result, production, revenues and related expenses were booked in the Corporation's statements of operations and retained earnings from March 1, 2008 onward. Prior thereto, all revenues and expenses related to Pod One were capitalized. In the winter of 2008, Connacher completed an extensive and successful 125 core hole drilling and 3D seismic program, focused on its main lease block at Great Divide. The results of the drilling program were reflected in the Corporation's June 30, 2008 reserve report by GLJ, which showed a significant increase in reserve volumes and pre-tax present values as compared to the year end 2007 reserve report. In July 2008, the Corporation's production at Great Divide Pod One surpassed 1 MMbbl of bitumen. During 2008, an aggregate of 2.14 MMbbl of bitumen was produced at Pod One and by year end 2008, total production since start-up was 2.16 MMbbl of bitumen. In November 2008, Connacher was granted an Order in Council and final approval from the ERCB to proceed with construction of the Algar Project. Subsequent to the issuance of these formal approvals, Connacher advanced its construction program at Algar, but construction was suspended in late December 2008 due to adverse financial, credit and economic market conditions and a decision to preserve cash and credit during a time of economic uncertainty. Notwithstanding the suspension of construction, certain activities, including building of long-lead order equipment and civil work at the Algar plant site and SAGD well pad sites, continued into 2009, to attempt to avoid the possibility of prolonged delays in the project's overall timeline. Construction at Algar and drilling of the 17 SAGD well pairs was reinstated in July 2009. In November 2008, the Corporation completed the monetization of its US$300 million cross currency and interest swap asset on its US$600 million Second Lien Notes for cash proceeds of $89.1 million. The completion of this transaction and the resultant increase in the Corporation's cash balances were accomplished without cost or equity dilution. In mid-December 2008, the Corporation announced that a decision had been made to temporarily curtail Pod One production. This decision was taken in response to the then rapid deterioration in the bitumen markets, the emergence of lower crude oil prices, the widening of heavy oil differentials as compared to WTI, a stronger Canadian dollar compared to the relative decline in crude oil prices from peak levels in mid-year 2008, regional marketing issues and some transportation and diluent cost issues. As a consequence, bitumen production at Pod One was reduced to approximately 5,000 bbl/d at the end of December 2008. Throughout 2008, a total of 1,101,583 stock options were exercised, resulting in the Corporation receiving cash proceeds of $893,000. In addition, 108,975 Common Shares were issued in 2008 pursuant to the Corporation's share award incentive plan for non-employee directors. On January 21, 2009, Connacher announced the resumption of bitumen production at Pod One due to improved market conditions arising from narrowed heavy oil differentials, improved marketing and transportation arrangements, enhanced diluent blending ratios and improved pricing achieved by locking in higher WTI pricing during a period of pricing contango for a portion of its production during 2009. During the winter of 2009, a total of 23 gross (23 net) core holes were drilled on the Corporation's Great Divide leases. In March 2009, Connacher arranged a $20 million demand operating financing facility for the purposes of issuing letters of credit (the "
L/C Facility
"). The L/C Facility was secured by cash and a first lien claim on certain
assets of the Corporation. Also in March 2009, Connacher filed a Proposed Terms of Reference with Alberta Environment with respect to the proposed expansion of its Pod One and Algar SAGD facilities from a combined capacity of 20,000 bbl/d of bitumen to approximately 44,000 bbl/d of bitumen. In June 2009, Connacher completed a marketed "bought-deal" financing of 191,762,500 Common Shares at a price of $0.90 per Common Share for gross proceeds of $172,586,250. The net proceeds of the offering were used to fund the Corporation's capital expenditures and for general corporate purposes, which included a portion of the capital costs associated with the construction of Algar, after such construction was reinstated in July 2009. - 10 - In June 2009, Connacher completed the sale of US$200 million aggregate principal amount of 11.75 percent first lien senior secured notes (the "
First Lien Notes
") due July 15, 2014, at a price of 93.678 percent,
resulting in gross proceeds of approximately US$187 million (approximately $212 million). In conjunction with the completion of the debt financing, the Board of Directors of Connacher authorized Management to proceed with the reactivation of construction of Algar. Field construction at Algar was resumed on July 7, 2009. The net proceeds of the debt financing were used for working capital and general corporate purposes, including, together with the net proceeds of the June 2009 equity offering, to fund a portion of the remaining construction, drilling and completion costs associated with the construction of Algar. In August 2009, Connacher purchased 13,556,000 units of Petrolifera pursuant to a marketed public offering completed by Petrolifera. Each unit was comprised of one common share in the capital of Petrolifera (a "
Petrolifera Share
") and one half of one Petrolifera warrant (each whole Petrolifera warrant being referred to herein
as a "
Petrolifera Warrant
"), with each Petrolifera Warrant entitling Connacher to purchase one Petrolifera Share at
an exercise price of $1.20 per share at any time on or before August 28, 2011. In the event that the 20-day volume weighted average price of the Petrolifera Shares on the TSX exceeds $2.50, Petrolifera may, within five business days after such an event, provide notice to the holders of Petrolifera Warrants of early expiry and thereafter the Petrolifera Warrants will expire on the date which is 30 days after the date of the notice to the holders of Petrolifera Warrants. Also in August 2009, the Corporation exercised 200,000 options to acquire Petrolifera Shares. As a result of the acquisition of units and the exercise of options, Connacher owns approximately 22 percent of the Petrolifera Shares. In October 2009, the Corporation announced officer promotions and new assignments. Mr. Cameron Todd was promoted to the position of Senior Vice President, Operations and was made responsible for all of Connacher's oil sands production operations, the Corporation's refining and marketing activity and its health, safety and environment portfolio. Mr. Russ Longley was appointed Vice President, Refining and Conventional Operations and assumed direct head office responsibility for Connacher's refining operations in Great Falls, Montana and continued to oversee Connacher's conventional crude oil and natural gas production. Mr. Merle Johnson was appointed to the position of Vice President, Engineering and assumed responsibility for the Corporation's production, drilling and reservoir engineering functions, with a primary emphasis on the management and development of Connacher's unconventional bitumen properties at Great Divide. Also in October 2009, Connacher completed a "bought-deal" financing of 23,172,500 flow-through Common Shares at a price of $1.30 per share for gross proceeds of $30,124,250. The gross proceeds from the offering will be used to further delineate and define the Corporation's oil sands properties through the drilling of additional core holes and for conducting a 3D seismic program over Connacher's oil sands properties. In November 2009, Connacher secured a new two-year US$50 million revolving credit facility (the "
Revolving Credit Facility
") and cancelled the L/C Facility.
Throughout 2009, a total of 579,724 stock options were exercised, resulting in the Corporation receiving cash proceeds of $388,000. In addition, 327,623 Common Shares were issued in 2009 pursuant to the Corporation's share award incentive plan for non-employee directors and 7,200 Common Shares were issued upon the conversion of $36,000 of Debentures. In January 2010, Connacher commenced its winter drilling program which resulted in the drilling of 68 core holes at Great Divide and 13 core holes at Halfway Creek (6.5 net core holes); the completion of two 3D seismic programs at Great Divide and Thornbury to identify potential oil sands accumulations that could be the target of future core hole programs; and the drilling of eight wells primarily for natural gas in northern Alberta as part of Connacher's conventional drilling program. The drilling of two additional horizontal SAGD well pairs at Pod One which commenced in December 2009 was completed in January 2010. The total budget for the winter drilling program was set at $45 million. The total capital expenditure budget for 2010 is expected to be approximately $256 million. - 11 -
Trends
The fallout from the worldwide economic crisis that had its roots in late 2007 continued to dominate the
early part of 2009. Equity and bank lending markets were virtually shut down, consumer and industrial demand
collapsed, consumer confidence plummeted, job losses continued and commodity prices remained weak. In
response, governments around the world continued to inject massive amounts of liquidity into the markets through
spending programs and financial intervention in efforts to stabilize banking systems and encourage lending, create
jobs and restore consumer confidence. As 2009 progressed, evidence of a recovering global economy, led by Asia,
began to emerge; stock markets began to rise, equity and debt capital markets reopened, housing price declines and
job losses abated, manufacturing increased, commodity prices showed signs of strength and demand forecasts
improved. These events, among others, are expected to contribute to a number of trends in 2010 as discussed below.
The recovery in crude oil prices, more than double from 2009 l
о
ws, growing demand for crude oil in Asia
and India and stunted world supply is expected to lead to a significant pick-up in activity in the Canadian oil sands in 2010 and beyond. Recent announcements from ConocoPhillips/Total SA, Husky Energy Inc./BP PLC, Canadian Natural Resources Limited and ExxonMobil Canada to initiate new or expand current oil sands projects are evidence of increased confidence in the oil sands industry. Other mega-project oil sands announcements could follow. As new monies begin to flow into the oil sands sector, price inflation for steel and services and labour shortages could once again emerge similar to that experienced during 2006 and 2007. This could put expansion economics at risk. There is an apparent risk aversion on the part of investors and a resulting positive investor bias towards companies in the oil sands with current production, proven ability to construct and operate projects and strong balance sheets. As a result, smaller land or technology based oil sands companies could find it difficult to attract or raise capital to finance their pilot or commercial projects, or compete in a constrained labour environment. This could lead to consolidation in this space. The recovery in crude oil prices has also brought with it a renewed interest in the Canadian oil sands from state, national and major international oil companies looking for access to oil reserves in countries with stable political environments. With the majority of lands in the Canadian oil sands under lease and dominated by large companies with little appetite for outside partners, these potential oil sands entrants may focus on junior or emerging oil sands companies for partnership or acquisition opportunities. This could become a very important source of capital to such companies. The price discount of heavy crude oil compared to light crude oil has been at its lowest percentage levels in recent history. This price discount has primarily been driven by the shortage of heavy crude oil in the United States, declining imports from Mexico and Venezuela and lagging production from Canada, coupled with higher demand for heavy crude oil from many US refineries which added conversion capacity in recent years and with the recent opening of a pipeline connecting heavy crude oil production from Western Canada to refining complexes on the US Gulf Coast. This narrow discount is anticipated to continue in the short to medium term. Consequently, producers of heavy crude oil and oil sands are expected to experience stronger netbacks and economics, which could lead to more heavy oil or oil sands projects. Conversely, narrow heavy crude oil discounts are expected to negatively impact the profitability of refineries. Also, tighter refined product margins resulting from a surplus of European and Asian gasoline production entering the US markets, a reduction in demand for gasoline as consumers reduce travel and purchase more fuel efficient vehicles and as industry demand for diesel and jet fuel remains soft as the economy slowly recovers, are expected to adversely impact the refining industry in North America in 2010 and beyond.
А
number of large complex refineries in the US have been shut in and more refineries
could be shut in or be closed or mothballed in 2010. In order to weather this deterioration, refineries may be forced to reduce or curtail production runs and focus efforts on specialty products and concentrate on customer servicing and marketing efforts. Technology advances and improvements in drilling practices have opened up unconventional oil and natural gas opportunities, especially in the natural gas shale formations of North America. These shale plays offer the prospect of natural gas wells with very high initial production levels, albeit with high initial capital costs and decline rates, that offer strong economics at prices above the $6.00/Mcf range. Natural gas production from the shale formations, plus the threat of liquefied natural gas imports from Europe and Asia, should limit the price of natural gas in the short to medium term. Natural gas production from conventional activity is expected to decline as - 12 - producers switch their focus to shale plays, plus the impact of a mature conventional natural gas basin reflecting high decline rates and high incremental costs of finding and development. Technological developments, including multi-stage fracs, have also led to revisiting oil-bearing formations, including the Cardium in Alberta, the Viking and Shaunavon in southwestern Saskatchewan and the Bakken in southeast Saskatchewan. Consolidation and asset rationalization amongst senior producers in Canada may result in a large number of good quality conventional oil and natural gas assets being available in the marketplace, accessible to those companies with strong balance sheets or access to capital. Finally, heightened environmental concern and activism continues, advocating that Canada's oil sands are a significant contributor to global warming. The perceived failure of the 2009 Copenhagen Summit brings with it uncertainty as to the direction of public policy regarding greenhouse gas emissions and environmental regulations. While the Canadian and Alberta governments have their own framework for reducing emissions, it is anticipated that Canadian regulations will mirror pronouncements, when issued, by the US.
BUSINESS OF THE CORPORATION
Connacher is an integrated oil company, primarily engaged in the exploration for, and the development,
production and marketing of bitumen, dilbit, crude oil and natural gas, the operation of a heavy oil refinery located
in Great Falls, Montana and the marketing of associated refined products. The Corporation's principal asset is its
100 percent working interest in approximately 98,000 net acres of oil sands leases. These are primarily situated in
the Divide, Thornbury and Quigley regions and include a 50 percent working interest in the Halfway Creek region,
all southwest of Fort McMurray, Alberta. The Corporation declared commerciality of its first 10,000 bbl/d SAGD
project, Pod One, at Great Divide effective March 1, 2008. The Algar Project, the Corporation's second 10,000
bbl/d SAGD project, is currently under construction and anticipated to be completed in mid-April 2010.
The Corporation also owns conventional producing crude oil and natural gas properties at Battrum,
Saskatchewan and at Marten Creek, Gilby/Three Hills and Latornell, Alberta. The Corporation also holds an
approximate 22 percent equity interest in Petrolifera, a public Canadian crude oil and natural gas production,
exploration and development company active in Argentina, Peru and Colombia.
Principal Properties
The following paragraphs describe the Corporation's principal properties. Readers are cautioned that the
estimates of reserves and future net revenue for individual properties may not reflect the same confidence level as
estimates of reserves and future net revenue for all properties, due to the effects of aggregation.
Oil Sands
Great Divide and Halfway Creek, Alberta
In this region of northeastern Alberta, the Corporation owns and operates 171.5 gross sections of oil sands
leases (152 net sections or 97,248 acres net) and 31.25 gross sections (22 net sections or 14,120 acres net) of
petroleum and natural gas rights. A number of bitumen accumulations have been identified on these leases.
The Corporation uses the interpretation of its 3D seismic program and the results of core hole drilling to
identify exploitable accumulations or pods. Upon receipt of the requisite results and regulatory approvals, the
Corporation uses SAGD technology as its primary method to extract bitumen from oil sands formations located
approximately 475 m below the surface in the Corporation's exploration area.
Construction on Pod One commenced in November 2006 and, despite the pressures in the construction
sector of the oil sands business at that time, was completed by August 2007, within the planned 300 days. Total cost
to complete Pod One was $272 million. After commissioning, the Corporation commenced the sequential injection
of steam into SAGD well pairs at Pod One on September 16, 2007. On October 22, 2007, the Corporation
announced that it had delivered and sold to market its first truckload of dilbit from Pod One. The Corporation
determined that Pod One achieved commerciality effective March 1, 2008. As a result, production, revenues and
related expenses have been recorded in the Corporation's statement of operations and retained earnings from March
1, 2008 onward.
- 13 -
In mid-December 2008, the Corporation announced that a decision had been made to temporarily curtail
Pod One production. This decision was taken in response to a number of factors including the rapid deterioration in
the bitumen prices and markets. As a consequence, bitumen production at Pod One was reduced to approximately
5,000 bbl/d at the end of December 2008.
Full production ramp-up at Pod One was reinstated in late January 2009, concurrent with an improvement
in heavy oil differentials, reduction in diluent blending and trucking costs and with hedges put in place to protect
against any further commodity price declines. Throughout 2009, however, production ramp-up has been constrained
in part arising from the decision to curtail production in the first half of the year, as a result of the installation of
ESPs, the completion of the mandatory turnaround in September and due to a number of other anomalous operating
issues including power outages, equipment failure and evaporator plugging. Production of bitumen averaged 6,334
bbl/d during 2009, with a daily peak rate measured at approximately 10,000 bbl/d in April 2009. By the end of
December 2009, bitumen production was stabilized at rates of 8,000 bbl/d.
Final regulatory approvals for the Algar Project were received in November 2008. Subsequent to the
issuance of these formal approvals, the Corporation advanced its construction program at the Algar Project by prebuilding
certain long lead items, but a decision was made to suspend construction in late December 2008 due to
deteriorating market conditions and a decision to preserve cash and credit during a time of economic uncertainty.
Road building and other civil projects were advanced in January 2009. Following the completion of certain
financing activities, field construction at Algar was resumed in July 2009.
The total cost of the Algar Project is estimated to be approximately $360 million, excluding a $15 million
contingency provision. The Corporation anticipates that completion of construction activities at Algar by mid-April
2010. Commissioning of the plant will take 30 days and is expected to commence in mid-April 2010. Connacher
completed the drilling of 17 horizontal SAGD well pairs at Algar in December 2009 at a cost of approximately $10
million under budget. The wells are expected to be completed and tied-in to the Algar plant in time for steam
circulation to begin after the 30 day Algar plant commissioning. Steam will be circulated in the well bores for
approximately 90 days thereafter, before the commencement of bitumen production from the Algar accumulation.
The Corporation continues to make progress on the application for the expansion of plant capacity at Great
Divide to 44,000 bbl/d of bitumen production. The expansion area covers the main Great Divide land block and
includes Pod One and the Algar Project, each at 10,000 bbl/d. An additional 24,000 bbl/d of facilities would be
added to the existing Algar site to meet the area target of 44,000 bbl/d. Public consultation, terms of reference and
studies have been completed with the next step being the submission of the EIA documents in the second quarter of
2010. The timing of project approvals would likely not allow construction on the expansion to commence until late
2011 or early 2012.
The Corporation has a pooling arrangement with Alberta Oilsands Inc., an arm's length party, in connection
with 38.5 gross sections of oil sands leases in the Halfway Creek area of Alberta. The pooling arrangement provides
for the joint ownership, evaluation and potential development of any resources which may be identified on the
subject leases. No exploration activities were conducted on these leases in 2009. Connacher is the designated
operator of the 2010 evaluation program(s) and of any identifiable development program which may occur. An
aggregate of 13 core holes (6.5 net core holes) were drilled at Halfway Creek during the Corporation's 2010 winter
drilling program.
Additional core hole drilling and 3D seismic interpretation was completed to further delineate identified
accumulations on Connacher's land. The Corporation's first quarter 2010 core hole program resulted in the drilling
of 68 core holes at Great Divide and 13 gross core holes at Halfway Creek. This data will be integrated into the
existing core hole and seismic database to determine which, if any, pods have sufficient size, aerial extent and
requisite reservoir quality to be confirmed or added as projects in addition to Pod One and the Algar Project.
The Connacher GLJ Report estimates the Corporation's 1P, 2P and 3P reserves in this area to be 173,225
Mboe, 379,180 Mboe and 461,672 Mboe, respectively.
- 14 -
Conventional Crude Oil and Natural Gas Assets
Connacher's principal conventional operations are at Marten Creek, Gilby/Three Hills and Latornell in
Alberta and at Battrum, Saskatchewan. The Connacher GLJ Report estimates the Corporation's 1P and 2P reserves
in this area to be 6,933 Mboe and 9,734 Mboe, respectively.
Marten Creek, Alberta
Marten Creek is a natural gas prone area located almost due west of Great Divide. Natural gas in the region
is produced from various relatively shallow zones in the Cretaceous Formation at a depth of approximately 2,000
feet. Daily gross natural gas production at Marten Creek for 2009 averaged 8.0 MMcfpd. The Corporation owns a
86.2 percent interest in approximately 160,480 gross acres (138,283 net acres) and operates 100 percent of its
petroleum and natural gas leases in this area. The Corporation has in excess of 2,000 km of two-dimensional, or 2D,
seismic data to explore and develop this area. No drilling was conducted at Marten Creek in 2009. Eight wells were
drilled by the Corporation in winter 2010. The Marten Creek area is a winter work area and, generally, all work must
be completed by the end of March in any given year. The Connacher GLJ Report estimates the Corporation's 1P
and 2P reserves in this area to be 3,348 Mboe and 4,771 Mboe, respectively.
Gilby/Three Hills, Alberta
Three Hills is located in southern Alberta, northeast of Calgary. The Corporation owns a 95.5 percent
interest in approximately 7,998 gross acres (7,638 net acres) at Three Hills, including a unitized waterflood, and is
the operator of this property. At Gilby, the Corporation has interests varying from 30 to 50 percent in approximately
8,144 gross acres (3,432 net acres). These properties produce light gravity crude oil and/or natural gas. Average
daily production from Gilby/Three Hills was 630 boepd in 2009. No drilling was conducted at Gilby/Three Hills in
2009. The Connacher GLJ Report estimates the Corporation's 1P and 2P reserves in this area to be 1,130 Mboe and
479 Mboe, respectively.
Latornell, Alberta
Latornell is located in central Alberta, approximately 100 km southeast of Grande Prairie. The Corporation
owns a 50 percent interest in approximately 10,418 gross acres (5,209 net acres) and a 100 percent interest in 3,378
acres at Latornell. This property is operated by a private corporation, a former officer of which is also a director of
Connacher. No drilling was conducted at Latornell in 2009. This area produces natural gas and natural gas liquids
from Cretaceous reservoirs. Average daily production from Latornell (net to Connacher) in 2009 was 180 boepd.
The Connacher GLJ Report estimates the Corporation's 1P and 2P reserves in this area to be 300 Mboe and 523
Mboe, respectively.
Battrum, Saskatchewan
The Corporation owns and operates working interests of 100 percent in unitized and non-unitized lands in
the Battrum region of southwestern Saskatchewan. The properties produce medium gravity crude oil from three
units using waterflooding to enhance oil recovery. For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Corporation's average
production from this area was 662 bbl/d of oil. There are presently 56 net producing oil and injection wells in this
area, which comprise 13,322 gross acres and 13,309 net acres. Two exploratory wells were drilled and abandoned
on these properties in 2009. The Connacher GLJ Report estimates the Corporation's working interest share of 1P
and 2P reserves in this area to be 1,746 Mboe and 2,366 Mboe, respectively.
The Refinery
The Refinery is a complex cracking/asphalt refinery located in Great Falls, Montana near the
Canadian/U.S. border. It processes approximately 9,500 bbl/d of heavy crude oil and produces approximately
10,000 bbl/d of refined products. The Refinery has a Muse-Stancil complexity rating of 10.0, which indicates the
ability of the Refinery to produce a broad range of refined products. The Refinery refines primarily Canadian Bow
River crude oil, a heavy crude that is similar to the dilbit being produced at Great Divide. The Refinery produces a
full range of transportation fuels, including gasoline, diesel and jet fuel with residual material being converted to
asphalt products. The Refinery also captures in its margin a portion of the differential between heavy oil and WTI,
resulting in a notional hedge against the impact of heavy oil price differential swings on the Corporation's oil sands
operations.
- 15 -
In order to comply with requirements of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, during 2008 the
Corporation implemented a clean fuels project to allow the Refinery to produce ultra-low sulphur diesel and
gasoline ("
ULSD
"). During the first quarter of 2009, the US$20 million ULSD project was completed at the
Refinery. Due to the down time required to tie-in the new hydrogen plant to complete this project and as a result of certain operational upsets due to significant cold weather, throughput volumes were lower in the fourth quarter of 2008 and first quarter of 2009 than in other recent quarters. Throughput volumes were also lower in the third quarter of 2009 due to the down time associated with the Refinery's triennial major maintenance and turnaround, which began in mid-September 2009 and was completed in mid-October 2009. Throughout 2009, refinery margins remained challenged due to the rise in the cost of crude oil, the narrowing of light and heavy crude oil differentials, lower refined products demand, including gasoline and diesel and the impact of gasoline imports into the US from Europe and India. The Refinery benefited from strong asphalt prices in 2009, a function of a shortage of asphalt in the US, the trickle-down impact of increased infrastructure spending from government initiatives and the result of the Refinery's efforts as a specialty-asphalt maker. The Refinery is uniquely positioned because of its close proximity to the markets it serves and its ability to refine heavy Canadian crude, with access to both local and regional markets via trucking and rail outlets that directly service the Refinery on-site. Access to crude oil is provided through the Front Range Pipeline which transports Bow River crude and other Canadian crude supplies directly to the Refinery.
Ownership of Petrolifera
As of the date of this Annual Information Form, Connacher owns an undiluted and unencumbered 22
percent equity interest in Petrolifera. Petrolifera is a publicly traded crude oil and natural gas production,
exploration and development company active in Argentina, Peru and Colombia with its common shares and
warrants listed for trading on the TSX under the symbol "PDP" and "PDP.WT", respectively.
Petrolifera holds interests in approximately six million acres of petroleum and natural gas rights in eleven
on-shore concessions or licenses in Argentina, Colombia and Peru. As of the date hereof, Connacher owns
26,898,859 Petrolifera Shares and 6,778,000 Petrolifera Warrants. Readers should refer to "The Corporation -
General Development of the Corporation" for information relating to the terms of the Petrolifera Warrants. Based
on the closing trading price of Petrolifera on March 18, 2010 of $0.91, Connacher's ownership of common shares of
Petrolifera (excluding common shares issuable upon the exercise of the Petrolifera Warrants) represents a $24.5
million investment. Based on Petrolifera's current public disclosures, Petrolifera anticipates participating in a gross
capital expenditure program of approximately $53 million during 2010.
Pursuant to NI 51-101, the Corporation is required to state the Corporation's share of Petrolifera's oil and
gas reserves, future net revenue and costs incurred during 2009 separately from its own corresponding reserves data
and other oil and gas information. Notwithstanding the equity accounting of the Corporation's investment in
Petrolifera, the Corporation has no right or entitlement to the reserves and future net revenue of Petrolifera as a
shareholder thereof. Set out in Schedule C to this Annual Information Form is a summary of the Corporation's 22
percent interest in Petrolifera's oil and gas reserves and future net revenue as at December 31, 2009 as evaluated by
GLJ in the Petrolifera GLJ Report and reported by Petrolifera in its Annual Information Form for the year ended
December 31, 2009. The Petrolifera GLJ Report was prepared using assumptions and methodology guidelines
outlined in the COGE Handbook and in accordance with NI 51-101. The pricing used in the forecast price
evaluations is set forth in the notes to the tables. Readers are cautioned that as a result of the exercise of any
outstanding Petrolifera Warrants or options of Petrolifera and the issuance by Petrolifera of additional securities, the
Corporation's interest in Petrolifera's reserves will decrease, unless the Corporation participates in such issuances of
securities.
The attached Schedule C has been prepared based on the publicly disclosed information that is contained in
the Petrolifera AIF. For additional information beyond what is set forth in Schedule C reference should be made to
the Petrolifera AIF which is posted on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and is not incorporated by reference in this Annual
Information Form.
OIL, NATURAL GAS AND BITUMEN RESERVES AND RESOURCES
Connacher engaged GLJ to prepare a report relating to the Corporation's reserves and resources as at
December 31, 2009. The information set forth below relating to the Corporation's reserves and resources constitute
- 16 -
forward looking information which is subject to certain risks and uncertainties. See "Forward Looking Information"
and "Risk Factors".
Oil, Natural Gas and Bitumen Reserves
Connacher's conventional crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids reserves are primarily located in
four areas, the Battrum area of Saskatchewan and the Marten Creek, Gilby/Three Hills and Latornell areas of
Alberta. Connacher's bitumen reserves are located in the Divide region near Fort McMurray, Alberta. Bitumen
reserves have been assigned to Pod One and Algar in the 1P, 2P and 3P categories and to the EIA expansion in the
2P and 3P categories. The Connacher GLJ Report assumed 200 SAGD well pairs for the proved case, 385 SAGD
well pairs for the 2P case and 400 SAGD well pairs for the 3P case, with cumulative SORs of approximately 3.2, 3.0
and 2.9 respectively, in each case. The cutoffs used by GLJ were 11 m of net pay for 1P bitumen reserves, 10 m of
net pay for 2P bitumen reserves and 9 m of net pay for 3P bitumen reserves.
Set out below is a summary of the crude oil, bitumen, natural gas and natural gas liquids reserves and the
value of future net revenue of the Corporation as at December 31, 2009 as evaluated by GLJ in the Connacher GLJ
Report. The preparation date of the Connacher GLJ Report is February 3, 2010. The pricing used in the forecast
price evaluations is set forth in the notes to the tables.
Possible reserves were only evaluated with respect to the Corporation's bitumen reserves. The
Corporation's conventional crude oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas reserves were not evaluated in the
possible reserves category.
Under NI 51-101, proved reserves are those reserves that can be estimated with a high degree of certainty
to be recoverable. It is likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the estimated proved
reserves. Probable reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves.
It is equally likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the sum of the estimated
proved plus probable reserves. Possible reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered
than probable reserves. It is unlikely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the sum of the
estimated proved plus probable plus possible reserves.
All evaluations of future revenue are after the deduction of royalties, development costs, production
costs and well abandonment costs but before consideration of indirect costs such as administrative, overhead
and other miscellaneous expenses. The estimated future net revenues contained in the following tables do not
necessarily represent the fair market value of the Corporation's reserves. There is no assurance that the
forecast price and cost assumptions contained in the Connacher GLJ Report will be attained and variances
could be material. Other assumptions and qualifications relating to costs and other matters are included in
the Connacher GLJ Report. The recovery and reserves estimates of the Corporation's properties described
herein are estimates only. The actual reserves on the Corporation's properties may be greater or less than
those calculated.
CONVENTIONAL AND BITUMEN RESERVE VOLUMES
BASED ON FORECAST PRICES AND COSTS
(8)
Light/Medium
Crude Oil
Bitumen
Natural Gas
Natural Gas
Liquids
Gross
(1)
(Mbbl)
Net
(1)
(Mbbl)
Gross
(1)
(Mbbl)
Net
(1)
(Mbbl)
Gross
(1)
(MMcf)
Net
(1)
(MMcf)
Gross
(1)
(Mbbl)
Net
(1)
(Mbbl)
Proved Developed Producing
(2)(5)
2,166 1,773 13,609 12,310 22,376 18,652 50 35
Proved Developed Non-Producing
(2)(6)
58 34 - - 3,347 2,819 19 14
Proved Undeveloped
(2)(7)
71 51 159,616 129,092 1,601 1,083 15 9
Total Proved
(2)
2,295 1,858 173,225 141,402 27,324 22,554 84 58
Total Probable
(3)
821 612 205,955 158,175 11,733 9,551 24 16
Total Proved Plus Probable
(2)(3)
3,116 2,471 379,180 299,577 39,057 32,105 108 74
Total Possible
(4)
- - 82,492 59,506 - - - -
Total Proved Plus Probable Plus Possible
(2)(3)(4)
3,116 2,471 461,672 359,083 39,057 32,105 108 74
- 17 -
NET PRESENT VALUE OF FUTURE NET REVENUE
BASED ON FORECAST PRICES AND COSTS
(8)
Before Deducting Income Taxes
Discounted At
After Deducting Income Taxes
Discounted At
Net Unit
Value Before
Income Tax
Discounted at
10%/year
(MM$)
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% ($/boe) ($/Mcfe)
Proved Developed Producing
(2)(5)
585 504 443 395 355 585 504 443 395 355 25.71 4.29
Proved Developed Non - Producing
(2)(6)
12 9 7 5 4 12 9 7 5 4 12.65 2.11
Proved Undeveloped
(2)(7)
4,033 1,885 1,042 644 427 3,093 1,453 811 505 337 8.06 1.34
Total Proved
(2)
4,630 2,398 1,492 1,043 787 3,690 1,996 1,260 905 697 10.14 1.69
Total Probable
(3)
8,003 1,800 664 357 237 5,913 1,320 490 267 180 4.14 0.69
Total Proved Plus Probable
(2)(3)
12,634 4,198 2,156 1,401 1,024 9,602 3,287 1,750 1,172 878 7.01 1.17
Total Possible
(4)
1,429 1,884 1,155 672 392 1,113 1,380 819 941 750 19.41 3.24
Total Proved Plus Probable Plus Possible
(2)(3)(4)
14,062 6,083 3,310 2,072 1,416 10,715 4,667 2,569 2,113 1,628 9.02 1.50
FUTURE NET REVENUE
(UNDISCOUNTED)
BASED ON FORECAST PRICES AND COSTS
(8)
Revenue
(9)
(MM$)
Royalties
(MM$)
Operating
Expenses
(MM$)
Capital Costs
(MM$)
Abandonment
Costs
(MM$)
Future
Net Revenue
Before
Income
Taxes
(MM$)
Income
Taxes
(MM$)
Future Net
Revenue
After
Income
Taxes
(MM$)
Total Proved
(2)
13,576 2,583 4,104 2,206 52 4,630 941 3,690
Total Proved Plus Probable
(2)(3)
36,593 7,876 10,400 5,565 119 12,633 3,031 9,602
Total Proved Plus Probable Plus Possible
(2)(3)(4)
38,297 8,677 10,061 5,389 109 14,062 3,348 10,715
FUTURE NET REVENUE BY PRODUCTION GROUP
BASED ON FORECAST PRICES AND COSTS
(8)
Production Group
Future Net Revenue
Before Income Taxes
(Discounted at 10%/Year)
(MM$) Net Unit Value
($/boe) ($/Mcfe)
Total Proved
(2)
Light and medium crude oil (including
solution gas and by-products) 57 28.51 4.75 Associated gas and non-associated gas (including natural gas liquids and excluding solution gas) 65 17.66 2.94 Bitumen 1,369 9.68 1.69 Total Proved Plus Probable
(2)(3)
Light and medium crude oil (including
solution gas and by-products) 75 28.03 4.67 Associated gas and non-associated gas (including natural gas liquids and excluding solution gas) 80 15.24 2.54 Bitumen 2,001 6.68 1.11
- 18 -
Production Group
Future Net Revenue
Before Income Taxes
(Discounted at 10%/Year)
(MM$) Net Unit Value
($/boe) ($/Mcfe)
Total Proved Plus Probable Plus
Possible
(2)(3)(4)
Light and medium crude oil (including
solution gas and by-products)
75 28.03 4.67
Associated gas and non-associated gas
(including natural gas liquids and
excluding solution gas)
80 15.24 2.54
Bitumen 3,156 8.79 1.46
RECONCILIATION OF COMPANY CONVENTIONAL AND BITUMEN RESERVES BY PRINCIPAL
PRODUCT TYPE BASED ON FORECAST PRICES AND COSTS
(8)
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the changes in Connacher's working interest, before
royalties, of light and medium crude oil, bitumen, associated and non-associated natural gas (combined) and natural
gas liquids reserves as at December 31, 2009 against such reserves as at December 31, 2008 based on the forecast
price and cost assumptions set forth in Note 8.
Light and Medium Crude
Oil
Bitumen
Associated and Non-
Associated Natural Gas
Natural Gas Liquids
Gross
Proved
(1)(2)
(Mbbl)
Gross
Probable
(1)(3)
(Mbbl)
Gross
Proved
Plus
Probable
(1)(2)(3)
(Mbbl)
Gross
Proved
(1)(2)
(Mbbl)
Gross
Probable
(1)(3)
(Mbbl)
Gross
Proved
Plus
Probable
(1)(2)(3)
(Mbbl)
Gross
Proved
(1)(2)
(MMcf)
Gross
Probable
(1)(3)
(MMcf)
Gross
Proved
Plus
Probable
(1)(2)(3)
(MMcf)
Gross
Proved
(1)(2)
(Mbbl)
Gross
Probable
(1)(3)
(Mbbl)
Gross
Proved
Plus
Probable
(1)(2)(3)
(Mbbl)
December 31, 2008 2,593 807 3,400 175,463 194,221 369,684 28,540 9,574 38,114 27 11 380
Discoveries - - - - - - - - - - - -
Extensions - - - - - - 229 (229) - 13 (13) -
Infill Drilling - - - - - - - - - - - -
Improved Recovery - - - - - - 571 2,113 2,684 - - -
Technical Revisions 52 16 68 79 11,734 11,813 1,954 225 2,179 77 26 103
Acquisitions - - - - - - 1,924 52 244 - - -
Dispositions - - - - - - - - - - - -
Economic Factors (3) (2) (4) - - - - (3) (3) - - -
Production (348) - (348) (2,316) - (2,316) (4,162) - (4,162) (32) - (32)
December 31, 2009 2,295 821 3,116 173,225 205,955 379,180 27,324 11,733 39,057 84 24 108
Notes:
(1) "Gross Reserves" are the Corporation's working interest (operating or non-operating) share before deducting royalties and without
including any royalty interests of the Corporation. "Net Reserves" are the Corporation's working interest (operating or non-operating)
share after deduction of royalty obligations, plus the Corporation's royalty interests in reserves.
(2) "Proved" reserves are those reserves that can be estimated with a high degree of certainty to be recoverable. It is likely that the actual
remaining quantities recovered will exceed the estimated proved reserves.
(3) "Probable" reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves. It is equally likely that the
actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the sum of the estimated proved plus probable reserves.
(4) "Possible" reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than probable reserves. It is unlikely that the actual
remaining quantities recovered will exceed the sum of the estimated proved plus probable plus possible reserves.
(5) "Developed Producing" reserves are those reserves that are expected to be recovered from completion intervals open at the time of the
estimate. These reserves may be currently producing or, if shut-in, they must have previously been on production, and the date of
resumption of production must be known with reasonable certainty.
(6) "Developed Non-Producing" reserves are those reserves that either have not been on production, or have previously been on production,
but are shut in, and the date of resumption of production is unknown.
(7) "Undeveloped" reserves are those reserves expected to be recovered from know accumulations where a significant expenditure (for
example, when compared to the cost of drilling a well) is required to render them capable of production. They must fully meet the
requirements of the reserves category (proved, probable, possible) to which they are assigned.
(8) The pricing assumptions used in the Connacher GLJ Report with respect to values of future net revenue (forecast) as well as the inflation
rates used for operating and capital costs are set forth below. GLJ is an independent qualified reserves evaluator appointed pursuant to
NI 51-101.
- 19 -
Light and
Medium Crude
Oil
Bitumen
Natural Gas
Natural Gas
Liquids
Inflation
Bank of Canada
Average Noon
Exchange Rate
WTI Cushing
Oklahoma
($US/bbl)
Wellhead
Current
($Cdn/bbl)
Alberta Spot
($Cdn/MMBtu)
Edmonton
Propane
($Cdn/bbl)
%/year
$US/$Cdn
Forecast
2010 80.00 51.50 5.96 52.46 2.0 0.950
2011 83.00 53.01 6.79 54.45 2.0 0.950
2012 86.00 54.36 6.89 56.43 2.0 0.950
2013 89.00 57.03 6.95 58.42 2.0 0.950
2014 92.00 60.77 7.05 60.42 2.0 0.950
2015 93.84 62.14 7.16 61.64 2.0 0.950
2016 95.72 63.53 7.42 62.88 2.0 0.950
2017 97.64 64.96 7.95 64.15 2.0 0.950
2018 99.59 66.41 8.52 65.45 2.0 0.950
2019 101.58 67.89 8.69 66.77 2.0 0.950
Thereafter +2.0%/yr +2.0%/yr +2.0%/yr +2.0%/yr 2.0 0.950
(9) Values include processing and other income.
Weighted average historical prices realized by the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009 were
$54.61/bbl for light and medium crude, $3.90/Mcf for natural gas, and $39.39/bbl for bitumen.
Undeveloped Reserves
Proved undeveloped reserves are generally those reserves related to planned infill drilling locations. Such
reserves may also relate to wells that have been drilled and not yet tied in because of seasonal access issues, the need
for further testing of the wells or construction of pipelines and production facilities for the well.
At December 31, 2009, Connacher's conventional net proved undeveloped reserves of 71 Mbbl of crude oil
were located at Three Hills and proved undeveloped reserves of 1,601 MMcf of natural gas were located at Marten
Creek, Three Hills and Parker. At Great Divide, proved undeveloped reserves of 159,616 Mbbl of bitumen were
assigned by GLJ in the Connacher GLJ Report. All of the Corporation's conventional proved undeveloped reserves
and approximately 12 percent of the Corporation's bitumen proved undeveloped reserves are scheduled to be
developed within the next two years. The balance of the Corporation's bitumen proved undeveloped reserves will be
developed as oil sands plant capacity becomes available.
The following table sets out the volumes of gross proved undeveloped reserves that were first attributed for
each of the Corporation's product types for each of the Corporation's most recent three financial years and in the
aggregate before that time using forecast prices and costs:
Period
Light and Medium
Crude Oil
(Mbbl)
Bitumen
(Mbbl)
Natural
Gas
(MMcf)
Natural Gas
Liquids
(Mbbl)
Aggregate Prior to December 31, 2007 315 43,841 - -
December 31, 2007 - - 1,098 -
December 31, 2008 266 124,216 2,368 15
December 31, 2009 - 79 - -
The Connacher GLJ Report estimates the Corporation's probable reserves to be 821 Mbbl of light or
medium crude oil, 205,955 Mbbl of bitumen, 11,733 MMcf of natural gas and 24 Mbbl of natural gas liquids.
Probable undeveloped reserves relate to wells to be drilled, tied in and brought on-stream in the future. All of the
Corporation's probable undeveloped conventional reserves will be developed over the next five years. A significant
portion of the Corporation's probable undeveloped bitumen reserves will be developed primarily with the
construction, startup and commissioning of the Algar Project.
- 20 -
The following table sets out the volumes of gross probable undeveloped reserves that were first attributed
for each of the Corporation's product types for each of the Corporation's most recent three financial years and in the
aggregate before that time using forecast prices and costs:
Period
Light and Medium
Crude Oil
(Mbbl)
Bitumen
(Mbbl)
Natural
Gas
(MMcf)
Natural Gas
Liquids
(Mbbl)
Aggregate Prior to December 31, 2007 280 40,307 229 -
December 31, 2007 - 76,652 1,830 -
December 31, 2008 - 73,186 1,071 7
December 31, 2009 - 11,734 - -
Significant Factors or Uncertainties
The Corporation does not anticipate that any important economic factors or significant uncertainties would
affect particular components of its reported reserves data. Notwithstanding, a number of factors which are beyond
the Corporation's control can significantly affect the Corporation's reserves, including product pricing, royalty and
tax regimes, changing operating and capital costs, surface access issues, availability of services and processing
facilities and technical issues affecting well performance. See "Risk Factors".
Future Development Costs
The following table sets forth the development costs deducted in the estimation of future net revenue
attributable to each of the following reserves categories contained in the Connacher GLJ Report:
Total Proved Future
Development Costs Using
Forecast Dollar Costs
(M$)
Total Proved Plus
Probable Future
Development Costs Using
Forecast Dollar Costs
(M$)
Total Proved Plus Probable
Plus Possible Future
Development Costs Using
Forecast Dollar Costs
(M$)
2010 118 124 130
2011 56 41 163
2012 36 96 459
2013 63 34 57
2014 46 51 73
Total for all remaining years
1,887 5,219 4,507
Total, undiscounted
2,206 5,565 5,389
Future development costs are expected to be funded from a combination of the following: operational cash
flow, debt and equity financing and/or farmout arrangements with other companies. The timing of such funding
may influence the timing of the developmental work expenditures.
Crude Oil and Natural Gas Properties and Wells
The following table sets forth the number of crude oil and natural gas wells in which Connacher held a
working interest as at December 31, 2009:
Crude Oil Natural Gas
Gross
(1) Net(1) Gross(1) Net(1)
Alberta
Producing 17 15 64 62
Non-producing 1 1 72 69
Saskatchewan
Producing 37 37 - -
Non-producing 37 37 9 9
Total
(2) 92 90 145 140
Notes:
(1) "Gross Wells" are the total number of wells in which Connacher has an interest. "Net Wells" are the number of wells obtained by
aggregating Connacher's working interest in each of its gross wells.
(2) Does not include 34 gross and net bitumen SAGD well pairs.
- 21 -
Of the non-producing wells reflected in the table above, 10 non-producing wells have been assigned
reserves in the Connacher GLJ Report. Each of these non-producing wells are expected to be tied-in in the next two
years.
Costs Incurred
The following table summarizes the capital expenditures made by Connacher on crude oil, bitumen and
natural gas properties for the year ended December 31, 2009:
Property Acquisition Costs
(MM$)
Exploration Costs
(MM$)
Development Costs
(MM$)
Proved Properties Unproved Properties
- 3 15 36
Exploration and Development Activities
The following table sets forth the number of exploratory and development wells which Connacher
completed during its 2009 financial year:
Exploratory Wells Development Wells
Gross
(1) Net(1) Gross(1) Net(1)
Oil Wells
(2)
23 23 - -
Gas Wells - - - - SAGD Wells - - 37 37 Suspended Wells 1 1 - - Observation Wells - - 1 1 Water Source / Disposal Wells - - 1 1 Dry Holes 1 1 - -
Total Completed Wells
25 25 39 39
Notes:
(1) "Gross Wells" are the total number of wells in which Connacher has an interest. "Net Wells" are the number of wells obtained by
aggregating Connacher's working interest in each of its gross wells.
(2) Includes 23 (gross and net) oil sands exploration delineation core holes.
In 2010 the Corporation will focus on the completion of Algar. A $256 million capital expenditure
program is envisaged for 2010 as set forth below.
(MM$)
Upstream
Complete Algar 78
Algar capitalized interest, general and administrative expenses and pre-commercial operations 52
Algar ESP pre-work and facility optimization 8
Cogeneration and sales transfer lines 22
Pod One, including two new SAGD wells, 9 high temperature ESPs/progressive cavity pumps and facility optimization 27
Environmental Impact Assessment application 2
Expand Pod One trucking terminal 4
Exploration program 28
Conventional and head office capital 17
Downstream
Refinery, including benzene removal project and steam boiler replacement 18
Total
$ 256
- 22 -
Properties with No Attributed Reserves
The following table sets out the Corporation's undeveloped land position as at December 31, 2009:
Undeveloped Acreage
(Acres)
Gross
(1) Net(1)
Alberta 184,691 157,385
Saskatchewan 20,505 19,979
Total
205,195 177,364
Note:
(1) "Gross" means the total area of properties in which the Corporation has a working interest. "Net" means the total area in which the
Corporation has an interest multiplied by the working interest owned by the Corporation.
The Corporation expects its rights to explore, develop and exploit approximately 41,206 gross (32,365 net)
acres of its unproved properties to expire within the next year.
The Corporation engaged Sayer to prepare an independent evaluation of the undeveloped land acreage of
the Corporation as at December 31, 2009. In the Sayer Energy Advisors Report a fair value of approximately $11.9
million or approximately $58 per gross acre was assigned to Connacher's non-reserve oil and gas properties,
excluding its oil sands acreage. In determining the market value, Sayer based their evaluation on the following
factors:
1. The acquisition cost, provided that there have been no material changes in the unproved property,
the surrounding properties, or the general oil and gas climate since the acquisition;
2. Recent sales by others of interests in the same unproved property;
3. Terms and conditions, expressed in monetary terms, of recent farm-in agreements related to the
unproved properties;
4. Terms and conditions, expressed in monetary terms, of recent work commitments related to the
unproved property; and
5. Recent sales of similar properties in the same general area.
Asset Retirement Obligations
The Corporation follows the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants' standard on Asset Retirement
Obligations to account for and report future asset requirement expenditures. This standard requires liability
recognition for retirement obligations associated with long-lived assets, which would include abandonment of oil
and natural gas wells, related facilities, compressors and gas plants, removal of equipment from leased acreage and
returning such land to its original condition. Under the standard, the estimated fair value of each asset retirement
obligation is recorded in the period a well or related asset is drilled, constructed or acquired. Fair value is estimated
using the present value of the estimated future cash outflows to abandon the asset at the Corporation's creditadjusted
risk-free interest rate. The obligation is reviewed regularly by Management based upon current regulations,
costs, technologies and industry standards. The discounted obligation is recognized as a liability and is accreted
against income until it is settled or the property is sold and is included as a component of depletion and depreciation
expense. Actual restoration expenditures are charged to the accumulated obligation as incurred.
As at December 31, 2009, the estimated total undiscounted amount required to settle the asset retirement
obligations in respect of the Corporation's 352 net producing and non-producing wells and facilities, net of estimated
salvage recoveries, was $72.1 million. These obligations will be settled over the useful lives of the underlying
assets, which currently extend up to 25 years. The 10 percent discounted present value of this amount is $26
million. Over the next three years, the Corporation expects to incur $2.7 (equivalent to $2.1 discounted at 10
percent) of these expenditures. No asset retirement obligations were booked for the Refinery as the Corporation
expects to maintain and operate the Refinery indefinitely.
- 23 -
In the Connacher GLJ Report, well abandonment costs for total proved plus probable plus possible reserves
were estimated to be $119 million, undiscounted, and $9 million, discounted at 10 percent. These estimates are in
respect of well costs only for wells that been assigned reserves and do not include costs to abandon pipelines and
facilities or wells for which no reserves have been assigned, which the Corporation has included in determining its
asset retirement obligation. These costs include abandonment of 200 net producing wells. Of the undiscounted
future net revenue estimated by GLJ, $3 million of abandonment and reclamation costs relating to facilities have not
been deducted.
Tax Horizon
Income earned in Canada is not expected to attract taxes until the Corporation utilizes its accumulated tax
pools and loss carry forwards, which exceed $1 billion. Based on anticipated capital spending, which augment the
tax pools, the Corporation does not expect to pay Canadian income taxes until approximately 2013. The
Corporation's US refining subsidiary is currently cash taxable.
Production Estimates
The following table sets forth the volume of working interest production, before royalties, estimated for
2010 in the Connacher GLJ Report for gross proved reserves and gross probable reserves:
Light/Medium Crude Oil
(bbl/d)
Bitumen
(bbl/d)
Natural Gas
(Mcf/d)
Natural Gas Liquids
(bbl/d)
Total Proved
(1)
875 8,550 11,544 71
Total Probable
(2)
126 755 234 7
Total Proved Plus Probable
(1)(2)
1,001 9,305 11,778 78
Notes:
(1) "Proved" reserves are those reserves that can be estimated with a high degree of certainty to be recoverable. It is likely that the actual
remaining quantities recovered will exceed the estimated proved reserves.
(2) "Probable" reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves. It is equally likely that the
actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the sum of the estimated proved plus probable reserves.
The following table indicates the volume of working interest production, before royalties, estimated for
2010 from fields considered to be individually important:
Light/Medium Crude Oil
(bbl/d)
Bitumen
(bbl/d)
Natural Gas
(Mcf/d)
Total
Proved
(1)
Total
Probable
(2)
Total Proved
Plus
Probable
(1)(2)
Total
Proved
(1)
Total
Probable
(2)
Total Proved
Plus
Probable
(1)(2)
Total
Proved
(1)
Total
Probable
(2)
Total Proved
Plus
Probable
(1)(2)
Battrum,
Saskatchewan
667 118 785 - - - - - -
Marten Creek,
Alberta
- - - - - - 8,575 53 8,628
Great Divide,
Alberta
- - - 8,550 755 9,305 - - -
Notes:
(1) "Proved" reserves are those reserves that can be estimated with a high degree of certainty to be recoverable. It is likely that the actual
remaining quantities recovered will exceed the estimated proved reserves.
(2) "Probable" reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves. It is equally likely that the
actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the sum of the estimated proved plus probable reserves.
- 24 -
Production History
The following table sets forth certain information in respect of Connacher's production, product prices,
royalties, production costs and netbacks received for each quarter of its most recently completed financial year:
Three Months Ended
March 31, 2009
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2009
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2009
Three Months Ended
December 31, 2009
Average Daily Production
Bitumen (bbl/d) 6,170 6,284 6,551 6,090
Light and Medium Oil (bbl/d) 1,180 1,114 993 880
Natural Gas (Mcfpd) 12,828 12,144 10,377 10,319
Average Net Prices Received
Bitumen ($/bbl) 22.45 40.95 45.30 48.23
Light and Medium Oil ($/bbl) 39.62 54.87 60.58 67.20
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) 4.89 3.35 2.91 4.34
Royalties
Bitumen ($/bbl) 0.23 0.16 1.81 1.90
Light and Medium Oil ($/bbl) 10.00 14.12 16.59 12.12
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) 1.20 0.10 (0.83) (0.09)
Production Costs
Bitumen ($/bbl) 20.41 14.79 16.92 23.20
Light and Medium Oil ($/bbl) 12.26 9.37 8.51 16.68
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) 2.17 2.33 2.30 2.24
Netback Received
Bitumen ($/bbl) (12.35) 0.81 37.26 11.46
Light and Medium Oil ($/bbl) 17.37 31.38 35.48 38.40
Natural Gas ($/Mcf) 1.52 0.92 1.44 2.19
The following table indicates the Corporation's average daily production for the year ended December 31,
2009 from fields considered to be individually important:
Light/Medium Crude
Oil
(bbl/d)
Bitumen
(bbl/d)
Natural Gas
(Mcfpd)
Battrum, Saskatchewan 662 - -
Marten Creek, Alberta - - 8,034
Great Divide, Alberta - 6,274 -
Competitive Conditions
The petroleum and natural gas industry is competitive in all aspects. Connacher competes with numerous
other companies for access to capital to fund its exploration and development activities. It also competes with other
companies in the search for exploration and development prospects and in the marketing of its production.
Connacher attempts to enhance its competitive position by:
−
focusing on a limited number of core areas;
−
maintaining high working interests;
−
wherever possible, operating properties;
−
securing control over infrastructure such as pipelines, gas processing facilities and its Refinery;
−
employing highly competent professional staff who use leading-edge technology; and
−
striving to be a low-cost producer.
Bitumen Resources
Currently, in the Great Divide region, proved, probable and possible reserves have been assigned to Pod
One and the Algar Project, which have received regulatory approval. Pod One has commenced production.
- 25 -
The Connacher GLJ Report also provided estimates of Contingent Resources associated with identified
pods that are outside current areas of production or development. Contingent Resources are those quantities of
petroleum estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially recoverable from known accumulations using established
technology or technology under development, but which are not currently considered to be commercially
recoverable due to one or more contingencies. There is no certainty that it will be commercially viable to produce
any portion of the resources. Contingent Resources were assigned in regions with lower core-hole drilling density
than the reserve regions and are outside current areas of application for development. These resource estimates are
not classified as reserves at this time, pending further reservoir delineation, project application, facility and reservoir
design work. Contingent Resources entail additional commercial risk than reserves, which have not been included in
the net present valuation. Adjustments for commercial risks have not been incorporated in the summaries of
Contingent Resources set forth below.
A range of Contingent Resource estimates (Low, Best and High) were prepared to reflect a range of
technical uncertainty. Low Estimate Contingent Resources were assigned to mapped regions of oil-in-place with at
least 12 m of continuous bitumen pay along with a conservative estimate of recovery factor. The majority of Low
Estimate Contingent Resources were assigned to identified pods outside areas of application. Best Estimate
Contingent Resources were assigned to mapped regions of oil-in-place of identified pods outside areas of application
for development with at least 10 m of continuous bitumen pay along with a best estimate of recovery factor. High
Estimate Contingent Resources were assigned to mapped regions of oil-in-place of identified pods outside areas of
application for development with at least 9 m of continuous bitumen pay along with a more optimistic estimate of
recovery factor.
The Connacher GLJ Report also provided estimates of Prospective Resources attributable to undiscovered
pods. Prospective Resources are those quantities of petroleum estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially
recoverable from undiscovered accumulations by application of future development projects. The Prospective
Resource estimates set forth below have been risked for the chance of discovery and hence are considered partially
risked estimates. Adjustments for commercial risks have not been incorporated in the summaries. There is no
certainty that any portion of the Prospective Resources will be discovered. If discovered, there is no certainty that it
will be commercially viable to produce any portion of the Prospective Resources. Prospective Resources were
attributable to undiscovered pods in unexplored regions, utilizing average parameters from the pods discovered to
date and the statistical success within the explored regions of the leases. Prospective Resources entail additional
commercial and exploration risks than reserves and Contingent Resources, which have not been included in the net
present valuation.
A range of Prospective Resources estimates were prepared to reflect a range of technical uncertainty. Best
and High Prospective Resource estimates were assigned using net pay thresholds of 10 m and 9 m, respectively. No
Low Estimate Prospective resources were assigned, given the risk of not encountering an undiscovered pod of
sufficient size to be considered commercial.
BITUMEN RESOURCES
The following table sets out Low, Best and High estimates of the Corporation's Contingent and Prospective
bitumen resources which are located in the Divide and Halfway Creek regions, both near Fort McMurray, Alberta:
Contingent Resources
Prospective Resources
Total Company Interest
(Mbbl)
Net After Royalty
(Mbbl)
Total Company Interest
(Mbbl)
Net After Royalty
(Mbbl)
Low Estimate
(1)
148,408 120,677 - -
Best Estimate
(2)
134,919 111,250 97,142 79,788
High Estimate
(3)
188,766 151,962 236,786 190,669
Notes:
(1) Low Estimate: this is considered to be a conservative estimate of the quantity that will actually be recovered. It is likely that the actual
remaining quantities recovered will exceed the low estimate. If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 90 percent
probability that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the low estimate.
(2) Best Estimate: this is considered to be the best estimate of the quantity that will actually be recovered. It is equally likely that the actual
remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the best estimate. If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 50
percent probability that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the best estimate.
- 26 -
(3) High Estimate: this is considered to be an optimistic estimate of the quantity that will actually be recovered. It is unlikely that the actual
remaining quantities recovered will exceed the high estimate. If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 10 percent
probability that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the high estimate.
BITUMEN RESOURCES AND TOTAL RESERVES
The following table sets out information pertaining to the Corporation's reserves and bitumen resources:
Marketable Reserves
and Resources
Gross Interest
Net After Royalty
Future Net Revenue - Before Tax
Present Value at
Light/Medium
Crude Oil
(Mbbl)
Bitumen
(Mbbl)
Natural
Gas
(MMcf)
NGLs
(Mbbl)
Light/Medium
Crude Oil
(Mbbl)
Bitumen
(Mbbl)
Natural
Gas
(MMcf)
NGLs
(Mbbl)
0%
MM$
5%
MM$
10%
MM$
1P Reserves 2,295 173,225 27,324 84 1,858 141,402 22,554 58 4,630 2,398 1,492
2P Reserves 3,116 379,180 39,057 108 2,471 299,577 32,105 74 12,634 4,198 2,156
3P Reserves 3,116 461,672 39,057 108 2,471 359,083 32,105 74 14,062 6,083 3,310
Low Estimate
Contingent Resources
- 148,408 - - - 120,677 - - 4,615 835 176
Best Estimate
Contingent Resources
- 134,919 - - - 111,250 - - 2,973 1,040 384
High Estimate
Contingent Resources
- 188,766 - - - 151,962 - - 4,819 1,545 531
Low Estimate
Prospective Resources
- - - - - - - - - - -
Best Estimate
Prospective Resources
- 97,142 - - - 79,788 - - 2,298 712 236
High Estimate
Prospective Resources
- 236,786 - - - 190,669 - - 6,333 1,832 610
The estimated future net revenues contained in the foregoing tables do not necessarily represent the fair
market value of the Corporation's reserves and resources. Additional information with respect to the Corporation's
1P, 2P and 3P reserves can be found under the heading "Oil, Natural Gas and Bitumen Reserves and Resources -
Oil, Natural Gas and Bitumen Reserves" in this Annual Information Form.
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
As of the date of this Annual Information Form the name, municipality of residence, positions held with the
Corporation and principal occupation during the preceding five years of each of the directors and officers of the
Corporation are as set forth below. Each elected director will hold office until the close of the next annual meeting
of shareholders of the Corporation, or until his successor is duly elected or appointed.
Name and Municipality
of Residence
Positions Held
Principal Occupation During the Preceding
Five Years
Director
Since
Richard A. Gusella
Calgary, Alberta
Canada
President, Chief
Executive Officer
and Director
President and Chief Executive Officer of
Connacher since May 2001 and Petrolifera from
November 2004 to March 2005. Executive
Chairman of Petrolifera since March 2005.
May 30,
2001
D. Hugh Bessell
(1)(2)(4)
Toronto, Ontario
Canada
Director Independent Businessman. Prior thereto, Deputy
Chairman and Chief Operating Officer of KPMG
LLP.
December 1,
2005
- 27 -
Name and Municipality
of Residence
Positions Held
Principal Occupation During the Preceding
Five Years
Director
Since
Colin M. Evans
(1)(2)(4)
Calgary, Alberta
Canada
Director President of Evans & Co. Inc., a private
consulting corporation providing financial and
operating advisory services to oil and gas
corporations since February 2010 and prior
thereto from 1990 to 2004. Senior Vice President
and previously Vice President, Finance, Milestone
Exploration Inc., a private oil and natural gas
exploration and production company from
September 2004 to February 2010.
April 5,
2004
Stewart D. McGregor
(3)(7)
Calgary, Alberta
Canada
Director President of Camun Consulting Corporation, a
private investment holding company, since 1994.
June 12,
2003
W.C. (Mike) Seth
(3)(4)(5)
Calgary, Alberta
Canada
Director President, Seth Consultants Ltd., a private
consulting firm. Prior thereto, Chairman of
McDaniel & Associates Consultants Ltd. and
prior thereto, President and Managing Director of
McDaniel & Associates Consultants Ltd.
December 9,
2005
Jennifer K. Kennedy
(3)(5)
Calgary, Alberta
Canada
Director Partner, Macleod Dixon
LLP
, a law firm, since
January 2000. May 12, 2009 Kelly J. Ogle
(1)(2)(5)
Calgary, Alberta
Canada
Director President and Chief Executive Officer of Trafina
Energy Ltd., an oil and gas company listed on the
TSX Venture Exchange, since October 2008.
From August 2007 to August 2008, President and
Chief Executive Officer of Upper Lake Oil and
Gas Ltd., a TSX listed oil and gas exploration and
development company. Prior thereto, President of
Diamond Tree Energy Ltd., a TSX listed oil and
gas company, and Diamond Tree Resources Ltd.,
a private oil and gas company from October 2004
until October 12, 2007.
May 12,
2009
Peter D. Sametz
Calgary, Alberta
Canada
Executive Vice
President, Chief
Operating Officer
and Director
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer of Connacher since December 2004.
May 12,
2009
Cameron M. Todd
Calgary, Alberta
Canada
Senior Vice
President,
Operations,
Refining and
Marketing
Senior Vice President, Operations, Refining and
Marketing of Connacher since October 2009.
Prior thereto, Vice President, Refining and
Marketing of Connacher since May 2006. Prior
thereto, Vice President, Worldwide Marketing of
Pioneer Natural Resources from June 2002 to
May 2006.
-
Richard R. Kines
Calgary, Alberta
Canada
Vice President,
Finance and
Chief Financial
Officer
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer since December 2004.
-
- 28 -
Name and Municipality
of Residence
Positions Held
Principal Occupation During the Preceding
Five Years
Director
Since
Stephen J. De Maio
Calgary, Alberta
Canada
Vice President,
Project
Development
Vice President, Project Development of
Connacher since November 2006. Prior thereto,
Consultant Engineer to in-situ oil sands
companies from March 2005. Chief Executive
Officer of Efficient Energy Ltd. ("
Efficient
Energy
") from December 2000 to March 2005.
- Merle D. Johnson Calgary, Alberta Canada Vice President, Engineering Vice President, Engineering of Connacher since October 2009. Prior thereto, Engineering Manager of Connacher since June 2007. Prior thereto, Development Engineer of EnCana Corporation since November 2001. - Russell W. Longley Calgary, Alberta Canada Vice President, Refining and Conventional Operations Vice President, Refining and Conventional Operations since October 2009. Prior thereto, Vice President, Operations of Connacher since May 2007. Prior thereto, was instrumental in the start-up, growth and divestment of a private junior exploration gas company. - Stephen A. Marston Calgary, Alberta Canada Vice President, Exploration Vice President, Exploration of Connacher since January 2006. Prior thereto, Chief Geophysicist of Real Resources Inc. since January 2001. - Grant D. Ukrainetz Calgary, Alberta Canada Vice President, Corporate Development Vice President, Corporate Development of Connacher since December 2007 and Treasurer of Connacher from June 2006 to February 2008. Prior thereto, Supervisor, Treasury and Treasury and Risk Management Analyst of Talisman Energy Inc. since September 2001. - I. Scott Carrothers Calgary, Alberta Canada Treasurer Treasurer of Connacher since February 2008. Prior thereto, Manager Corporate Finance with Paramount Resources Ltd. since 2004 and prior thereto, Senior Treasury Advisor and Corporate Finance Advisor with Encana Corporation and Alberta Energy Company Ltd. since 1999. - Rashi Sengar Calgary, Alberta Canada Secretary Partner, Macleod Dixon LLP, a law firm, since April 2009. Prior thereto, Associate, Macleod Dixon LLP since July 2001. -
Notes:
(1) Member of the Audit Committee.
(2) Member of the Human Resources Committee.
(3) Member of the Governance Committee.
(4) Member of the Reserves Committee.
(5) Member of the Health, Safety and Environment Committee.
(6) Connacher does not have an Executive Committee.
(7) Lead Director.
As at March 17, 2010, the directors and executive officers of Connacher, as a group, beneficially owned,
directly or indirectly, or exercised control or direction over 3,207,319 Common Shares constituting approximately
one percent of the issued and outstanding Common Shares.
No director, officer or shareholder holding sufficient securities of the Corporation to affect materially the
control of the Corporation, a personal holding company of any such person, or a company for which such person is
or has acted as a director or executive officer that while such person was acting in that capacity, or within a year of
the person ceasing to act in that capacity is or has, within the 10 years before the date of this Annual Information
- 29 -
Form, become bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or been subject
to any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee
appointed to hold the assets of such person, except as hereinafter set forth. Colin M. Evans made a proposal
involving Canada Revenue Agency under the
Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act
(Canada) on February 24, 2005, which
was approved by the Court of Queen's Bench (Alberta) on May 18, 2005. Richard A. Gusella was a director and officer and Kelly J. Ogle was a director of Carmanah Resources Ltd. ("
Carmanah
") until May 2000. A receiver
was appointed to hold Carmanah's assets on January 16, 2001, approximately eight months after Messrs. Gusella and Ogle resigned as an officer and director and a director of Carmanah, respectively. Stephen De Maio was an officer and director of Efficient Energy until March 2005. Subsequent to his resignation, in May 2005, a receiver was appointed to hold Efficient Energy's assets.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Composition and Qualifications
The Corporation's Audit Committee consists of three outside and independent directors namely, Messrs.
Bessell, (Chair), Ogle and Evans. The Board has determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee are
"financially literate" as defined in National Instrument 52-110. An individual is considered financially literate if he
has the ability to read and understand a set of financial statements that present a breadth and complexity of
accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of issues that can reasonably be
expected to be raised by the issuer's financial statements. In addition, D. Hugh Bessell has, based upon his
experience and educational background, been determined by the Board to be an "audit committee financial expert".
The education and experience of each member of the Corporation's Audit Committee relevant to the performance of
his responsibilities are as set forth below:
D. Hugh Bessell, Chair
Mr. Bessell is a chartered accountant by training and has an extensive accounting background. He retired
as a partner of KPMG
LLP
in December, 1999 after holding the position of Deputy Chairman and Chief Operating
Officer, which position he held for approximately six years. He spent a total of 33 years with KPMG
LLP
and its
predecessor firms, and was Managing Partner of the firm's Calgary office immediately prior to assuming the role of Deputy Chairman in 1993. Mr. Bessell was a member of the Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Alberta and served as its President for a period of time. Mr. Bessell has been granted the FCA designation by both the Alberta and the Ontario Institutes of Chartered Accountants in recognition of his support and contributions to his profession and community. His expertise is particularly important in his capacity as Chairman of the Corporation's Audit Committee and Mr. Bessell has been determined to be an "audit committee financial expert".
Colin M. Evans
Mr. Evans holds a Bachelors Degree in Economics from the University of Alberta and has had an extensive
business career in most facets of the oil and gas industry since the mid 1960's. He has worked in positions of
increasing responsibility with both large and small private and public companies. He has also worked in the
Canadian securities industry and more recently has advised a variety of oil companies on both operational and
financial matters. Mr. Evans is currently the President of Evans & Co. Inc., a private consulting corporation
providing financial and operating advisory services to oil and gas corporations, a position he has held since February
2010 and prior thereto from 1990 to 2004. In addition, from September 2004 to March 2010 Mr. Evans held the
position of Senior Vice President, Milestone Exploration Inc., a private oil and natural gas exploration and
production company.
Mr. Evans served as Chair of the Corporation's Audit Committee from March 23, 2005 to December 1,
2005.
Kelly J. Ogle
Mr. Ogle holds a Bachelors of Arts Degree from the University of Saskatchewan and is currently attending
the Directors' Education Program with a view to completing the ICD designation during the spring of 2010. In
addition, Mr. Ogle is currently attending the University of Calgary as a Masters Candidate in the Faculty of Military
and Strategic Studies.
- 30 -
Mr. Ogle has been involved in the oil and gas industry for the past fourteen years. Mr. Ogle is currently the
President and Chief Executive Officer of Trafina Energy Ltd. and has held such position since October 2008. From
August 2007 to August 2008, Mr. Ogle was President and Chief Executive Officer of Upper Lake Oil and Gas Ltd.,
a TSX listed oil and gas exploration and development company. Prior thereto, Mr. Ogle was President of Diamond
Tree Energy Ltd., a TSX listed oil and gas company, and Diamond Tree Resources Ltd., a private oil and gas
company from October, 2004 until October 12, 2007. Prior thereto, Mr. Ogle was the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Ranchgate Energy Inc., then a TSX listed oil and gas company, from January 2003 to August 2004.
Responsibilities and Terms of Reference
The Audit Committee reviews with Management and the external auditors, and recommends to the Board
of Directors for approval, the annual financial statements of the Corporation and the reports of the external auditors
thereon, the interim financial statements of the Corporation and related financial reporting, including management's
discussion and analysis and earnings press releases on the annual and interim financial statements of the
Corporation. The Audit Committee reviews and establishes, in conjunction with the external auditors and
Management, audit plans and procedures and meets with the auditors independently of Management at each
regularly scheduled meeting and otherwise as considered appropriate. The Audit Committee is responsible for
reviewing auditor independence, approving all non-audit services, reviewing and making recommendations to the
Board of Directors on internal control procedures and management information systems. In addition, the Committee
is responsible for assessing and reporting to the Board on financial risk management positions. Set out as Schedule
D is the text of the Audit Committee's charter.
All permissible categories of non-audit services require pre-approval from the Audit Committee.
External Auditor Service Fees
The following summarizes the total fees billed by Deloitte & Touche
LLP
, the external auditor of the
Corporation, for the years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
2009 2008
Audit fees $ 427,700 $ 252,300
Audit-related fees
(1)
470,500 67,800
Tax fees
(2)
- -
All other fees - -
TOTAL
$ 898,200 $ 320,100
Notes:
(1) Fees for assurance and related services by Deloitte & Touche
LLP
in connection with their review of the Corporation's financial statements
and not otherwise reported under "Audit Fees". Such services include review engagement fees for the non-audit review of the Corporation's quarterly consolidated financial statements and services related to financings. (2) Fees for tax compliance, tax advise and tax planning.
Deloitte & Touche
LLP
are independent within the meaning of the Rules of Professional Conduct of the
Institute of Chartered Accountants of Alberta.
PERSONNEL
As at December 31, 2009, the Corporation had 59 employees at its head office in Calgary, 52 field
employees and 94 employees at its Refinery in Great Falls, Montana.
- 31 -
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE
The Corporation is authorized to issue an unlimited number of Common Shares, an unlimited number of
first preferred shares and an unlimited number of second preferred shares (together, "
Preferred Shares
"), issuable
in series, up to US$200 million aggregate amount of First Lien Notes, up to US$600 million aggregate amount of Second Lien Notes and 100,050 4.75 percent convertible senior unsecured debentures ("
Debentures
"), of which as
at December 31, 2009, 427,031,362 Common Shares, no Preferred Shares, US$200 million aggregate amount of First Lien Notes, US$587 million aggregate amount of Second Lien Notes and $100 million aggregate principal amount of Debentures were issued and outstanding. The following is a summary of the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attaching to the Common Shares, Preferred Shares, Notes and Debentures.
Common Shares
The holders of Common Shares are entitled to: dividends if, as and when declared by the Board of
Directors; to one vote per share at meetings of the holders of Common Shares of the Corporation; and upon
liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation to receive pro rata the remaining property and assets of the
Corporation, subject to the rights of shares having priority over the Common Shares. All of the Common Shares
currently outstanding are fully-paid and non-assessable.
At the Corporation's annual and special meeting of shareholders held on May 10, 2007 the shareholders of
the Corporation adopted a shareholder rights plan (the "
Rights Plan
"), all as described in the material change report
of the Corporation dated May 15, 2007. The objectives of the Rights Plan are to ensure, to the extent possible, that all shareholders of the Corporation are treated equally and fairly in connection with any takeover bid or similar offer for all or a portion of the Common Shares of the Corporation. The Rights Plan discourages discriminatory, coercive or unfair takeovers of the Corporation and gives the Board of Directors time if, in the circumstances, the Board of Directors determines it is appropriate to take such time, to pursue alternatives to maximize shareholder value in the event an unsolicited takeover bid is made for all or a portion of the outstanding Common Shares of the Corporation. In connection with the adoption of the Rights Plan by shareholders, the Corporation issued one right in respect of each Common Share outstanding at the close of business on May 10, 2007 (the "
Record Time
") and
authorized the issuance of one right in respect of each additional Common Share issued after the Record Time. The rights trade with and are represented by Connacher's Common Share certificates, including certificates issued prior to the Record Time. Readers may obtain a copy of the Rights Agreement governing the Rights Plan by accessing the Corporation's publicly filed documents, including the Rights Agreement, on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Pursuant to the rules of the TSX, the shareholders of the Corporation will be asked to renew the Rights Plan at the annual and special meeting of shareholders of the Corporation scheduled for May 11, 2010. If the shareholders of the Corporation do not approve the renewal of the Rights Plan at such meeting, the Rights Plan will be terminated.
Preferred Shares
The Preferred Shares are issuable in series and each class of Preferred Shares will have such rights,
restrictions, conditions and limitations as the Board of Directors may from time to time determine. The holders of
Preferred Shares are entitled, in priority to holders of Common Shares, to be paid rateably with holders of each other
series of Preferred Shares the amount of accumulated dividends, if any, specified to be payable preferentially to the
holders of such series and upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, to be paid rateably with
holders of each other series of Preferred Shares the amount, if any, specified as being payable preferentially to
holders of such series.
First Lien Notes
The First Lien Notes were issued on June 16, 2009 and mature on July 15, 2014. See "The Corporation -
General Development of the Corporation". The First Lien Notes bear interest at 11.75 percent per year. Semiannual
interest payments are due January 15 and July 15 of each year, with the final payment on July 15, 2014. The
Corporation may redeem up to 35 percent of the aggregate principal amount of the First Lien Notes prior to July 15,
2011 with the net proceeds of certain equity offerings, provided at least 65 percent of the aggregate principal amount
of the First Lien Notes remain outstanding after the redemption and subject to limitations contained in the
- 32 -
Corporation's senior secured credit facilities. At any time prior to July 15, 2011, the Corporation may redeem the
First Lien Notes in whole or in part at their principal amount, plus the applicable premium and accrued interest.
After July 15, 2011, the Corporation may redeem some or all of the First Lien Notes at certain specified redemption
prices. The Corporation may also redeem the First Lien Notes in certain other limited circumstances, including in
the event of certain tax law changes. The First Lien Notes are general senior obligations, secured by first priority
liens on certain specified collateral and rank equally in right of payment with all of the Corporation's existing and
future indebtedness that is not subordinated in right of payment of the First Lien Notes, rank senior to all the
Corporation's existing and future subordinated indebtedness, unconditionally guaranteed by certain guarantors and
are effectively senior to the Second Lien Notes and all existing and future indebtedness that is either secured by liens
that rank junior to the liens securing the First Lien Notes or unsecured, with respect to and to the extent of the value
of the collateral. The First Lien Notes are effectively subordinated to all of the Corporation's future senior priority
lien obligations, to the extent secured by the collateral including the Revolving Credit Facility The First Lien Notes
are secured by a first ranking charge over all of the existing and future property of the Corporation and its restricted
subsidiaries, excluding the Corporation's equity interest in Petrolifera and the existing assets of Great Divide
Pipeline Corporation.
Second Lien Notes
The Second Lien Notes were issued on December 3, 2007 and mature on December 15, 2015. See "The Corporation
- General Development of the Corporation". The Second Lien Notes bear interest at 10.25 percent per year. Semiannual
interest payments are due June 15 and December 15 of each year, with the final payment on December 15,
2015. The Corporation may redeem up to 35 percent of the aggregate principal amount of the Second Lien Notes
prior to December 15, 2010 with the net proceeds of certain equity offerings, provided at least 65 percent of the
aggregate principal amount of the Second Lien Notes remain outstanding after the redemption and subject to
limitations contained in the Corporation's senior secured credit facilities. At any time prior to December 15, 2011
the Corporation may redeem the Second Lien Notes in whole or in part at their principal amount, plus the applicable
premium and accrued interest. After December 15, 2011, the Corporation may redeem some or all of the Second
Lien Notes at certain specified redemption prices. The Corporation may also redeem the Second Lien Notes in
certain other limited circumstances, including in the event of certain tax law changes. The Second Lien Notes are
general senior obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of the Corporation's existing and future
indebtedness that is not subordinated in right of payment of the Second Lien Notes, rank senior to all the
Corporation's future subordinated indebtedness and effectively are subordinated to all existing and future secured
indebtedness of the Corporation and of its restricted subsidiaries, including the Revolving Credit Facility and First
Lien Notes. See "The Corporation - General Development of the Corporation". The Second Lien Notes are secured
by a second ranking charge over all of the existing and future property of the Corporation and its restricted
subsidiaries, excluding the Corporation's equity interest in Petrolifera and the existing assets of Great Divide
Pipeline Corporation.
Debentures
The Debentures were issued on May 25, 2007. See "The Corporation - General Development of the
Corporation". The Debentures mature June 30, 2012 unless converted prior to that date and bear interest at an
annual rate of 4.75 percent payable semi-annually on June 30 and December 31. The Debentures are convertible at
any time into Common Shares at the option of the holder at a conversion price of $5.00 per Common Share. The
Debentures are redeemable by the Corporation on or after June 30, 2010, in whole or in part, at a redemption price
equal to 100 percent of the principal amount of the Debentures to be redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest
provided that the market price of the Common Shares is at least 120 percent of the conversion price of the
Debentures.
CREDIT RATINGS
The Notes are currently rated by two separate agencies, Moody's Investor Service ("
Moody's
") and
Standard and Poors ("
S&P
"). Please refer to the table below for the respective ratings assigned to the Notes.
Moody's S&P
First Lien Notes B1 BBSecond
Lien Notes Caa2 BB-
33 -
The Corporation is currently rated by Moody's and S&P. Please refer to the table below for the respective
ratings assigned to the Corporation.
Moody's S&P
Caa1 B
Moody's Rating Definition – Moody's long-term obligation ratings are opinions of the relative credit risk
of fixed-income obligations with an original maturity of one year or more. They address the possibility that a
financial obligation will not be honoured as promised. Such ratings reflect both the likelihood of default and any
financial loss suffered in the event of default. Moody's appends numerical modifiers 1, 2, and 3 to each generic
rating classification from Aaa through Caa. The modifier 1 indicates that the obligation ranks in the higher end of its
generic rating category; the modifier 2 indicates a midrange ranking; and the modifier 3 indicates a ranking in the
lower end of that generic rating category. Investment grade under the Moody's rating system would be Baa3 and
higher. Obligations rated Caa are judged to have speculative elements and are subject to substantial credit risk.
S&P Rating Definition – Obligations rated BB, B, CCC, CC and C are regarded as having significant
speculative characteristics. BB indicates the least degree of speculation and C the highest. While such obligations
likely will have some quality and protective characteristics, these may be outweighed by large uncertainties or major
exposure to adverse conditions. An obligation rated BB is less vulnerable to non-payment than other speculative
issues. However, it faces major ongoing uncertainties or exposure to adverse business, financial or economic
conditions that could lead to the obligor's inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.
BB is one notch below that which is considered "Investment Grade" (BBB- and higher) under the S&P rating
system. S&P appends + and - modifiers to each generic rating classification from AAA to CCC. The modifier +
indicates that the obligation ranks in the higher end of its generic rating category; a rating without a modifier
indicates that the obligation ranks in the middle of its generic rating category; and the modifier - indicates that the
obligation ranks in the lower end of its generic rating category.
A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to revision or
withdrawal at any time by the rating organization.
PRIOR SALES
The First Lien Notes were sold during the year ended December 31, 2009 at a price of 93.678 percent. See
"The Corporation - General Development of the Corporation" and "Description of Share Capital - First Lien Notes".
In addition, options to acquire an aggregate of 12,318,375 Common Shares at a weighted average exercise price of
$0.96 were issued during the year ended December 31, 2009.
DIVIDEND POLICY
The Corporation has not declared or paid any dividends on its Common Shares since incorporation. Any
decision to pay dividends on the Common Shares will be made by the Board of Directors on the basis of the
Corporation's earnings, financial requirements and other conditions that the Board of Directors may consider
appropriate in the circumstances.
- 34 -
MARKET FOR SECURITIES
The Common Shares are listed and posted for trading on the TSX under the trading symbol "CLL". The
following table sets out the high and low price for, and the volume of trading in, the Common Shares on the TSX, as
reported by the TSX, on a monthly basis for the financial year ended December 31, 2009.
Monthly Price Range
Volume High Low
($) ($)
January 25,024,017 1.00 0.68
February 12,447,436 0.96 0.71
March 29,915,289 0.78 0.61
April 65,641,972 1.45 0.74
May 86,304,888 1.66 0.93
June 97,753,156 1.17 0.87
July 29,515,557 0.94 0.76
August 33,633,008 1.06 0.86
September 66,057,530 1.15 0.92
October 73,285,454 1.11 0.94
November 40,938,175 1.07 0.96
December 93,754,485 1.33 1.02
The Debentures are listed and posted for trading on the TSX under the trading symbol "CLL.DB". The
following table sets out the high and low price for, and the volume of trading in, the Debentures on the TSX, as
reported by the TSX, on a monthly basis from the date of listing to December 31, 2009.
Monthly Price Range
Volume High Low
(000's) ($) ($)
January 5,660 50.00 42.50
February 48,187 46.00 37.00
March 67,440 42.00 35.00
April 379,290 47.75 31.01
May 184,630 65.00 46.10
June 226,550 65.00 56.85
July 29,890 63.49 57.00
August 66,260 75.00 62.00
September 93,785 77.50 72.00
October 94,840 86.50 75.50
November 65,860 87.00 82.75
December 27,350 92.00 85.00
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
The transfer agent and registrar for the Connacher Shares and Debentures is Valiant Trust Company at its
principal offices in Calgary, Alberta and in Toronto, Ontario.
RISK FACTORS
Risks Relating to Economic Conditions, Commodity Pricing and Exchange Rate Fluctuations
The Corporation's results of operations depend upon the prevailing prices of crude oil and natural gas in the
worldwide markets. Those prices are subject to widespread fluctuations.
The Corporation's revenues, cash flow, earnings, cost of capital, asset values, results of operations and
financial condition are dependent upon the prevailing price of crude oil and natural gas, heavy oil differentials and
the prices of related products that the Corporation produces at the Refinery. These commodity prices are beyond the
control of the Corporation. Beginning in July 2008, there was a decline in oil and natural gas prices due, at least in
part, to a significant decline in the global economy. The decline in commodity prices adversely affected the
- 35 -
Corporation. Although commodity prices have made marked improvements over the recent months as compared to
the lows experienced in the latter part of 2008 and into 2009, any further declines in such prices in the future will
adversely affect the Corporation's financial condition and results of operations, cash flows, access to capital markets
and ability to grow. The Corporation's financial condition, operating results and future rate of growth depend upon
the prices that the Corporation receives for its oil and natural gas. Such prices also affect the amount of the
Corporation's cash flow available for capital expenditures and the Corporation's ability to access funds.
The aforementioned significant decline in oil and natural gas prices has adversely impacted the market
value and lending value of the Corporation's estimated proved reserves. Sustained low prices or a further decline in
such prices could result in a material reduction of the Corporation's operating and financial results, production
revenue, reserves and overall value. In addition, any prolonged period of low oil prices could result in a decision by
the Corporation to suspend or reduce production. Any such suspension or reduction of production would result in a
corresponding substantial decrease in the Corporation's revenues and earnings and could materially impact the
Corporation's ability to meet its debt servicing obligations and could expose the Corporation to significant additional
expense as a result of any future long-term contracts. If production was not suspended or reduced during such
period, the sale of the petroleum products produced by the Corporation at such reduced prices would lower its
revenues. There can be no assurance that the conditions in the oil and natural gas industries will improve and that the
oil and natural gas prices will increase in the future.
The Corporation conducts an assessment of the carrying value of its assets to the extent required by
Canadian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("
GAAP
"). If crude oil and/or natural gas prices or the market
value of investment holdings decline, the carrying value of the Corporation's assets could be subject to downward revision and its earnings could be adversely affected. Although the Corporation does not currently anticipate any "ceiling test" write downs of its oil and gas assets, or impairment charges to its other assets, there can be no assurance that declines in crude oil prices or other circumstances will not result in such "ceiling test" write downs or impairment charges at some future date.
Crude oil and natural gas prices can fluctuate significantly.
Crude oil prices have historically been extremely volatile and fluctuate significantly in response to regional,
national and global supply and demand factors beyond the Corporation's control. Among the factors that can cause
crude oil and natural gas price fluctuations are:
• changes in the level of consumer demand for petroleum products and natural gas;
• the domestic and foreign supply of crude oil and natural gas, including the decisions of the
Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries relating to export quotas and their compliance or
non-compliance with such self-imposed quotas;
• weather conditions, including hurricanes, floods and other natural disasters;
• domestic and foreign governmental regulations;
• the effect of worldwide conservation of resources;
• new bitumen, crude oil and natural gas discoveries;
• economic growth in developed and emerging nations;
• the price and availability of alternative fuels, including liquefied natural gas;
• political conditions in crude oil and natural gas producing regions, including terrorist activities and
other hostilities;
• the proximity of reserves to, and capacity of, transportation facilities;
• the price of foreign imports of crude oil, natural gas and refined products;
• overall global and domestic economic conditions; and
- 36 -
• concern over climate change or emissions of greenhouse gases ("
GHGs
").
Global financial conditions have been subject to increased volatility. This may impact the Corporation's ability to
obtain equity, debt or bank financing in the future and may adversely impact its operations.
Current global financial conditions have been subject to increased volatility. Numerous commercial and
financial enterprises have either gone into bankruptcy or creditor protection or have had to be rescued by
governmental authorities. Recently, access to public financing has been negatively impacted by sub-prime mortgage
defaults, the liquidity crisis affecting the asset-backed commercial paper and collateralized debt obligation markets,
massive investment losses by banks with resultant recapitalization efforts and requirements and a deterioration in the
global economy. These factors may impact the Corporation's ability to obtain equity, debt or bank financing on
terms commercially reasonable to the Corporation, if at all. Additionally, these factors, as well as other related
factors, may cause decreases in asset values that are deemed to be other than temporary, which may result in
impairment losses. If these increased levels of volatility and market turmoil continue, the Corporation's operations
could be adversely impacted and the trading price of its securities could continue to be adversely affected.
Banks have been adversely affected by the recent worldwide economic crisis and have severely curtailed
existing liquidity lines, increased pricing and introduced new and tighter borrowing restrictions to corporate
borrowers, with extremely limited access to new facilities or for new borrowers. These factors could negatively
impact the Corporation's ability to access liquidity needed for its business in the longer term. The Corporation may
be unable to maintain a level of cash flow from operating activities sufficient to permit the Corporation to pay the
principal, interest and premium, if any, on the Corporation's indebtedness.
In addition, certain of the Corporation's customers could experience an inability to pay the Corporation, in
the event they are unable to access the capital markets to fund their business operations.
The Corporation is subject to foreign currency exchange fluctuation exposure.
Revenue received from the sale of crude oil is generally referenced to a price denominated in U.S. dollars.
The majority of the Refinery's business is conducted in U.S. dollars. Additionally, the Notes are denominated in
U.S. dollars and interest payable thereon is denominated in U.S. dollars. As the Corporation reports its operating
results, as contained in its balance sheet, statement of comprehensive income (loss) and statement of cash flows, in
Canadian dollars, fluctuations in product pricing and fluctuations in the rate of exchange between the U.S. dollar and
Canadian dollar would affect, and could result in a material change in, reported results.
The Corporation has issued U.S. dollar denominated debt.
Interest and principal payments on the Notes must be made in U.S. dollars. If the Canadian dollar weakens
with respect to the U.S. dollar, the Canadian dollar cost of these payments will increase.
The Corporation may engage in hedging activities which have a negative impact on earnings and cash flow.
The Corporation continually evaluates the use of and often employs exchange-traded or over-the-counter
derivative structures to hedge commodity, interest rate and foreign exchange risk. Risks associated with such
products include, but are not limited to, counterparty risk, settlement risk, basis risk, liquidity risk and market risk
which could impair or negate the Corporation's hedging strategy and result in a negative impact on its earnings and
cash flow.
Due to the uncertain worldwide economic environment, there can be no assurance that the Corporation will
be able to engage credit worthy counterparties in hedging activities with it.
- 37 -
Risks Relating to the Great Divide Pod One Project and Algar Project
Pod One is operational but there remains a risk that the Corporation may have interruptions or reductions of
operations or increased costs. Algar is anticipated to commence operations in 2010 and will be subject to the
same risks as Pod One.
Pod One was declared commercial effective March 1, 2008, but there remains a risk that the Corporation
may experience interruptions or reductions of operations, increased costs or decreased margins due to many factors,
including, without limitation:
• prevailing commodity prices or other economic factors resulting in uneconomic operations;
• facility performance falling below expected levels of output or efficiency;
• breakdown or failure of equipment or processes;
• reservoir performance;
• errors in construction or design affecting operations;
• labour disputes, disruptions or declines in productivity;
• increases in materials, services, transportation or labour costs;
• non-performance by, or financial failure of, third-party contractors;
• disruption or delays in availability of transportation services;
• energy supply disruption;
• conditions imposed by regulatory approvals;
• increased royalty payments based on the price of WTI or further changes to royalty regimes;
• shortages of, or delays in, accessing required equipment and services;
• permit requirement violation;
• transportation or operations accidents;
• delays induced by weather; and
• catastrophic events such as fire, earthquakes, storms or explosions.
Algar is anticipated to commence commercial operations in 2010 following commissioning, steam
circulation and start-up. During start-up and thereafter, there is a risk that the Algar Project may experience
interruptions or reductions in operations, increased costs and decreased margins based on the factors described
above. If any of the above events occur, it could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation's business,
financial condition and results of operations.
If the Corporation's Pod One and/or Algar SAGD facilities do not operate as planned, the Corporation's revenue,
cash flow and earnings may be reduced.
The performance of the Corporation's Pod One and Algar SAGD facilities may differ from the
Corporation's expectations. The variances from the Corporation's expectations may include, without limitation:
• the ability to operate at the expected level of throughput or production;
• the ability to realize the expected long-term SORs; and
- 38 -
• the reliability or availability of the facilities.
If the facilities do not perform to the Corporation's expectations or as required by regulatory approvals, the
Corporation may be required to invest additional capital to correct deficiencies or the Corporation may not be able to
produce the expected level of production. If these expectations are not met, the Corporation's revenue, cash flow
and earnings could be reduced.
The operating costs of Pod One may vary considerably during the operating period and the operating costs of
Algar may vary considerably during start-up and thereafter during the operating period. If they increase, the
Corporation's earnings and cash flow may be reduced.
The operating costs of Pod One may vary considerably during the operating period. If such costs increase,
the Corporation's earnings and cash flow will be reduced. The factors which could affect operating costs include,
without limitation:
• the cost of natural gas and electricity;
• the actual steam to oil ratio required to operate the SAGD well pairs;
• the amount and cost of labour to operate Pod One and Algar;
• power outages, particularly in winter when freeze-ups could occur;
• produced sand causing erosion, hot spots and corrosion;
• reliability of the facilities;
• the maintenance costs of the facilities;
• well performance and pump life;
• workovers or the need to drill additional wells and rig availability;
• the cost to transport bitumen, diluent and dilbit and the cost to dispose of certain by-products;
• the cost of insurance and the inability to insure for certain types of losses;
• catastrophic events such as fires, earthquakes, storms or explosions;
• the cost of catalyst and chemicals; and
• the cost of complying with regulatory approvals.
The selling price received for bitumen produced at Great Divide may vary considerably during the
operating period. If certain factors that adversely influence bitumen pricing increase, the Corporation's earnings and
cash flow will be reduced. These factors may include, separately or collectively:
• the heavy oil differential;
• the cost of diluent;
• the cost to transport diluent;
• the operation of and access to proximate upgraders;
• the dilbit quality differential; and
• the cost to transport dilbit.
- 39 -
In addition, the absolute price of crude oil prices, as measured by WTI, and U.S./Canadian foreign
exchange rates will influence the selling price of bitumen received by the Corporation. A low WTI price and a
strong Canadian dollar would negatively impact earnings and cash flow of the Corporation.
Access to diluent supplies at favourable prices may be limited.
Bitumen is characterized by high specific gravity or weight and high viscosity or resistance to flow.
Diluent is required to facilitate the processing and transportation of bitumen. A shortfall in the supply of diluent
may cause its cost to increase or alternative diluent supplies to be purchased, thereby increasing the cost to transport
bitumen to market and correspondingly increasing the Corporation's operating cost and negatively impacting the
overall profitability of Great Divide.
In-situ extraction is subject to uncertainty.
Current SAGD technologies for in-situ recovery of heavy oil and bitumen are energy intensive, requiring
significant consumption of natural gas or other fuels in the production of steam which is used in the recovery
process. The amount of steam required in the production process can also vary and impact costs. The quality and
performance of the reservoir can also impact the timing and levels of production using this technology. Commercial
application of this technology for bitumen is relatively new, and accordingly in the absence of long-term operating
history there can be no assurances with respect to the sustainability of SAGD operations.
The recovery of bitumen from oil sands is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are
outside of the Corporation's control.
Recovering bitumen from oil sands involves particular risks and uncertainties. Severe weather conditions
can cause reduced production and in some situations result in higher costs. SAGD bitumen recovery facilities and
development and expansion of production can entail significant capital outlays. Equipment failures could result in
damage to the Corporation's facilities or wells and liability to third parties against which the Corporation may not be
able to fully insure or may elect not to insure because of high premium costs or for other reasons.
Abandonment and reclamation costs relating to Great Divide may be higher than anticipated.
The Corporation will be responsible for compliance with terms and conditions of environmental and
regulatory approvals and all laws and regulations regarding the abandonment of Pod One and Algar and reclamation
of its lands at the end of its economic life, the cost of which may be substantial. A breach of such legislation and/or
regulations may result in the imposition of fines and penalties, including an order for cessation of operations at the
site until satisfactory remedies are made. It is not possible to estimate reliably the abandonment and reclamation
costs since they will be a function of regulatory requirements at the time and the value of the salvaged equipment
may be more or less than the abandonment and reclamation costs. In the future the Corporation may determine it
prudent or be required by applicable laws or regulations to establish and fund one or more reclamation funds to
provide for payment of future abandonment and reclamation costs.
Transportation to and from Great Divide is subject to certain hazards.
The Corporation expects that it will initially truck bitumen to market. Normal hazards associated with
trucking include proximity to a busy highway (Highway 63) and traffic. The Corporation anticipates that vehicular
traffic to and from Pod One will be via Highway 63. Collisions between vehicles and wildlife remain a significant
hazard.
The Corporation may also use rail or pipelines to transport dilbit to the market and diluent to Pod One.
Normal hazards associated with transportation by rail include collisions with vehicles and wildlife and rail line
breaks.
- 40 -
Future pods at Great Divide, including the completion of the Algar Project, may be subject to delay due to
commodity price declines and credit and capital market conditions, regulatory approvals and economic
downturns. These expansion pods may not be completed on time, on budget or at all and once operational, may
be subject to delays, interruptions or increased costs that may materially adversely affect the Corporation's results
of operations.
Future pods at Great Divide, including Algar, will be subject to construction stage and financing risks.
Additionally, there is a risk that future operations, including expansion of production at Great Divide, may have
delays, interruption of operations or increased costs due to many factors, including, without limitation:
• prevailing commodity prices or other economic factors resulting in uneconomic operations;
• shortages of, delays in, and increasing costs for obtaining qualified labour, equipment,
construction materials or services;
• labour disputes, disruptions or declines in productivity;
• changes in the scope of the project or increases in the amount or cost of materials or labour;
• contractor or operator errors in design or construction and non-performance by, or financial failure
of, third party contractors;
• breakdown or failure of equipment or processes;
• delays in obtaining, or conditions imposed by, regulatory approvals;
• an inability to obtain adequate financing, or financing on terms satisfactory to the Corporation;
• transportation or construction accidents, disruption or delays in availability of transportation
services or adverse weather conditions affecting construction or transportation;
• unforeseen site surface or subsurface conditions;
• disruption in the supply of energy; and
• catastrophic events such as fires, earthquakes, storms or explosions.
The Corporation's development and operation of any additional pods at Great Divide, including Algar, and
the Corporation's proposed expansion of Algar will be subject to substantially all of the same risks as those set forth
in this Annual Information Form for Pod One in general.
Prior to the recent deterioration in the economy and resulting determinations to delay, defer or suspend
future oil sands development by various oil sands owners, the industry was in a period of unprecedented oil sands
development and high industrial activity. For example, the Corporation experienced cost overruns in connection
with the development of Pod One, which the Corporation believed to be modest in light of inflationary pressures and
in comparison to the relative cost pressures faced by other oil sands operators in this area during this time. The
Corporation's expansion projects will need to compete for equipment, supplies, services, and labour in this
environment, which could result in increased costs or, shortages of goods and services that delay progress, or both.
In addition, participation in expansion projects will significantly increase the demands on the Corporation's
Management and administrative resources and require significant financing. The Corporation may not be able to
effectively manage or finance the expansions and any failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on the
Corporation's business, financial condition or results of operations. Additionally, financing required to fund these
expansion projects may not be available on terms and conditions acceptable to the Corporation or at all. See "Risk
Factors-Risks Related to Financing and the Corporation's Indebtedness".
- 41 -
Risks Relating to the Corporation's Oil Sands and Conventional Operations
The Corporation must obtain and maintain regulatory approvals and comply with stringent environmental
laws and regulations. The failure to obtain such approvals and comply with any of these laws and regulations
could, among other things, prevent or limit the Corporation's operations or subject the Corporation to
substantial liability, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation's business and
financial condition.
The operation and eventual decommissioning of the Corporation's projects and operations, as well as the
construction of future phases of the Corporation's oil sands projects, the development of additional projects and
reclamation of the lands used in the Corporation's operations, are conditional upon various environmental and
regulatory approvals issued by governmental authorities. There is no assurance such approvals will be issued, or
once issued, not repealed, or renewed, or that they will not contain terms and conditions which make the
Corporation's projects and operations uneconomic or cause the Corporation to significantly alter its projects and
operations. Further, the development, operation and eventual decommissioning of the Corporation's projects and
reclamation of the Corporation's lands are and will be subject to approvals, laws and regulations relating to
environmental protection and operational safety. Risks of substantial costs and liabilities are inherent in both oil
sands and conventional oil and natural gas production recovery and there can be no assurance that substantial costs
and liabilities will not be incurred or that the Corporation's projects or conventional operations will be permitted to
carry on operations. Moreover, it is possible that other developments, such as increased levels of royalties or
increasingly strict environmental and safety laws, regulations and enforcement policies thereunder and claims for
damages to property or persons resulting from the project's operations could result in substantial costs and liabilities
to the Corporation or delays to, or abandonment of, the Corporation's projects and operations, including Pod One
and Algar.
No assurance can be given that future environmental approvals, processes, laws or regulations will not
adversely impact the Corporation's ability to develop, operate or expand its operations or increase or maintain its
production or will not increase the Corporation's unit costs of production for crude oil, natural gas and bitumen.
Canada is a signatory to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (the "
Convention
") and has
ratified the Kyoto Protocol established thereunder to set legally binding targets to reduce nation-wide emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and other greenhouse gases, or GHGs. The Corporation will be a producer of some GHGs covered by the Convention as a result of Pod One. On April 26, 2007, the Canadian Federal Government released a
Regulatory Framework for Air Emissions (the "Framework
"), which outlines proposed new
requirements governing the emission of GHGs and other industrial air pollutants, including sulphur oxides, volatile organic compounds, particulate matter, and possibly additional sector specific pollutants, in accordance with the Canadian Federal Government's
Notice of Intent to Develop and Implement Regulations and Other Measures to
Reduce Air Emissions
released on October 19, 2006. On March 10, 2008, the Canadian Federal Government
elaborated on the Framework with the release of its
Turning the Corner
policy document. It is unknown if or when
new regulations will be released or take effect. The Framework, together with the Canadian Federal Government's
Turning the Corner
policy document
released in March 2008, introduces further, but not full, detail on new GHG and industrial air pollutant limits and compliance mechanisms that will apply to various industrial sectors, including the oil sands extraction, upgrading and electricity production industries starting in 2010. The Canadian Federal Government is in the process of consulting stakeholders about the emission intensity reduction targets which are contemplated to form the basis of new draft regulations. The proposed compliance mechanisms include fixed emission caps and an emissions credit trading system for certain industrial air pollutants, and several options for companies to choose among to meet GHG emission reduction targets and encourage the development of new emission reduction technologies, including the option of making payments into a technology fund, an emissions trading system, and limited credits for emission reductions created between 1992 and 2006. Future federal industrial air pollutant and GHG emission reduction targets, together with provincial emission reduction requirements in Alberta's
Climate Change and Emissions Management Act
, or emission
reduction requirements in future regulatory approvals, may require the reduction of emissions or emissions intensity from the Corporation's operations and facilities, payments to a technology fund or purchase of emission reduction or off-set credits. The required emission reductions may not be technically or economically feasible to implement for Pod One or the Corporation's conventional oil and natural gas activities and the failure to meet such emission reduction requirements or other compliance mechanisms may materially adversely affect the Corporation's business - 42 - and result in fines, penalties and the suspension of operations. As well, equipment from suppliers which can meet future emission standards may not be available on an economic basis and other compliance methods of reducing emissions or emission intensity to required levels in the future may significantly increase our operating costs or reduce output of our projects. Emission reduction or off-set credits may not be available for acquisition by our projects or may not be available on an economic basis. There is also the risk that the provincial government could impose additional emission or emission intensity reduction requirements, or that the federal and/or provincial governments could pass legislation which would tax such emissions. To operate the facilities Great Divide relies on non-potable subsurface water, which is obtained under licenses from Alberta Environment. There can be no assurance that the licenses to withdraw subsurface water will not be rescinded or that additional conditions will not be added to these licenses. There can be no assurance that the Corporation will not have to pay a fee for the use of water in the future or that any such fees will be reasonable. In addition, the expansion of the Corporation's projects rely on securing licenses for additional water withdrawal, and there can be no assurance that these licenses will be granted on terms favourable to the Corporation or at all, or that such additional water will in fact be available to divert under such licenses.
The Corporation's business may suffer in the event of a loss of key personnel.
The Corporation faces numerous risks due to the stage of its development, as well as certain other factors.
The Corporation's success will depend in part on the ability, expertise, judgment, discretion and good faith of the
Corporation's Management and its ability to retain them. The Corporation does not maintain key-man life insurance
with respect to any of its employees. The loss of any key personnel may have a material adverse effect on the
Corporation's business, financial condition or results of operations.
The Corporation's oil and gas operations are subject to numerous operational hazards and other risks against
which the Corporation may not be insured.
The operation of Pod One and Algar and the Corporation's conventional oil and gas properties will be
subject to the customary hazards of recovering, transporting and processing hydrocarbons, such as fires, explosions,
gaseous leaks, migration of harmful substances, blowouts and oil spills. A casualty occurrence might result in the
loss of equipment or life, as well as injury or property damage. The Corporation will not carry insurance with
respect to all potential casualty occurrences and disruptions. It cannot be assured that the Corporation's insurance
will be sufficient to cover any such casualty occurrences or disruptions. The Corporation's operations could be
interrupted by natural disasters or other events beyond its control. Losses and liabilities arising from uninsured or
under insured events could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation's business, financial condition and
results of operations.
The labour force is limited and the Corporation may not be able to hire all of the labour force required at the
compensation levels budgeted for or at all.
The labour force in Alberta, and specifically in the Fort McMurray and surrounding area, has at times been
limited. The resurgence of activity experienced in the oil sands industry as of late may impact on the Corporation's
ability to access the necessary skilled labourers to operate Pod One and the Algar Project, construct expansion
projects and to operate and maintain the Corporation's conventional crude oil and natural gas properties could have
an adverse affect on the Corporation's development plans. The Corporation competes with other oil sands projects
for experienced employees and such competition may impact the availability of employees and/or may result in
increases to compensation paid to such employees. In addition, rising personnel costs could result in increases in
general and administrative expenses and labour costs which may adversely affect the Corporation's cash flow and
earnings.
Title review will be done in accordance with industry standards but will not guarantee title to the Corporation's
properties.
The Corporation's oil sands properties were leased from the Crown in Right of Alberta and although title
reviews will be done according to industry standards prior to the purchase of most crude oil and natural gas
producing properties (excluding properties acquired from the Crown in Right of Alberta) or the commencement of
drilling wells, such reviews do not guarantee or certify that an unforeseen defect in the chain of title will not arise to
defeat the Corporation's claim which could result in a reduction of the revenue the Corporation receives. If such
- 43 -
were the case, the Corporation's entitlement to the production and reserves associated with such leases could be
jeopardized, which could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation's financial condition, results of
operations and the Corporation's ability to execute its business plan in a timely manner or at all.
Aboriginal peoples may make claims against the Corporation or its properties.
Aboriginal peoples have claimed aboriginal title and rights to a substantial portion of western Canada.
Certain aboriginal peoples have filed a claim against the Government of Canada, the Province of Alberta, certain
governmental entities and the regional municipality of Wood Buffalo (which includes the City of Fort McMurray,
Alberta) claiming, among other things, aboriginal title to large areas of lands surrounding Fort McMurray, including
the lands on which Pod One, Algar and most of the other oil sands operations in Alberta are located. Such claims, if
successful, could have a significant adverse effect on the Corporation and Great Divide. The Corporation continues
to consult with and work with Aboriginal groups at Great Divide.
Risks Relating to Financing and the Corporation's Indebtedness
The Corporation's overall level of indebtedness represents a large portion of its current capitalization and could
constrain its operations.
The Corporation has a significant amount of indebtedness and the Corporation's level of indebtedness could
materially and adversely affect it in a number of ways. For example, it could:
• make it more difficult for the Corporation to conduct its operations;
• increase the Corporation's vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
• require the Corporation to dedicate a portion of its cash flow from operations to service payments
on its indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of the Corporation's cash flow to fund
working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes;
• limit the Corporation's flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in its business and the
industry in which it operates;
• place the Corporation at a competitive disadvantage compared to its competitors that have less
debt; and
• limit the Corporation's ability to borrow additional funds on commercially reasonable terms, if at
all, to meet its operating expenses and for other purposes.
The Corporation's ability to make scheduled repayments or to re-finance its debt obligations will depend upon its
financial and operating performance.
The Corporation's ability to make scheduled repayments or to re-finance its debt obligations will in part
depend upon the Corporation's financial and operating performance, which in turn will partially depend upon
prevailing industry and general economic conditions which are beyond its control. There can be no assurance that
the Corporation's operating performance, cash flow and capital resources will be sufficient to service and/or repay
its debt in the future, in which case the Corporation may be required to sell assets to repay its debt, defer capital
expenditures or raise additional debt or equity, to the extent available.
If the Corporation is unable to obtain sufficient funding, its ability to expand its operations may be impaired.
Depending on future exploration, development, acquisition and divestiture plans, including additional
projects at the Corporation's oil sands properties in the Great Divide and Halfway Creek regions and the operations
and capacity of the Refinery, the Corporation may require additional external financing and in the case of
expansions of the Refinery and for further oil sands development, the amount of such financing may be significant.
The Corporation's ability to arrange such financing in the future will depend in part upon the prevailing capital
market conditions, as well as the Corporation's business performance. There can be no assurance that the
- 44 -
Corporation will be successful in its efforts to arrange additional financing on terms satisfactory to the Corporation
or at all. If the Corporation obtains additional financing by the issuance of shares from treasury, control of the
Corporation may change and existing shareholders may suffer additional dilution.
From time to time the Corporation may enter into transactions to acquire assets or the shares of other
corporations. These transactions may be financed partially or wholly with debt, which may temporarily increase the
Corporation's debt levels above industry standards.
The Corporation borrows funds in U.S. dollars.
A significant portion of the Corporation's debt is denominated in U.S. dollars. Fluctuations in exchange
rates may significantly increase or decrease the amount of debt recorded on the Corporation's financial statements.
The Corporation may employ derivative structures to hedge foreign exchange risk, however, no derivative structure
will protect against all fluctuations.
Risks Relating to Reserves and Resources
Undue reliance should not be placed on estimates of reserves and resources, since these estimates are subject to
numerous uncertainties. The Corporation's actual reserves could be lower than such estimates.
There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved, probable and possible
reserves and quantities of Contingent and Prospective Resources and future net revenues to be derived therefrom,
including many factors beyond the Corporation's control. The reserve, resource and future net revenue information
set forth herein represents estimates only. The reserves, resources and estimated future net cash flow from the
Corporation's properties have been independently evaluated by GLJ with an effective date of December 31, 2009.
These evaluations include a number of assumptions relating to factors such as initial production rates, production
decline rates, ultimate recovery of reserves and resources, timing and amount of capital expenditures, marketability
of production, future prices of blended bitumen, crude oil and natural gas, operating costs, well abandonment and
salvage values, royalties and other government levies that may be imposed over the producing life of the reserves
and resources. These assumptions were based on prices in use at the date the relevant evaluations were prepared,
and many of these assumptions are subject to change and are beyond the Corporation's control. Actual production
and cash flow derived therefrom will vary from these evaluations, and such variations could be material.
Estimates with respect to reserves and resources that may be developed and produced in the future are often
based upon volumetric calculations, probabilistic methods and upon analogy to similar types of reserves and
resources, rather than upon actual production history. Estimates based on these methods generally are less reliable
than those based on actual production history. Subsequent evaluation of the same reserves based upon production
history will result in variations, which may be material, in the estimated reserves or resources.
Reserve and resource estimates may require revision based on actual production experience. Such figures
have been determined based upon assumed commodity prices and operating costs. Market price fluctuations of
crude oil and natural gas prices may render uneconomic the recovery of certain grades of bitumen. Moreover, short
term factors relating to oil sands resources may impair the profitability of Pod One in any particular period.
The present value of estimated future net revenue referred to herein should not be construed as the fair
market value of estimated bitumen, crude oil and natural gas reserves and bitumen resources attributable to the
Corporation's properties. The estimated discounted future revenue from reserves are based upon price and cost
estimates which may vary from actual prices and costs and such variance could be material. Actual future net
revenue will also be affected by factors such as the amount and timing of actual production, supply and demand for
bitumen, crude oil and natural gas, curtailments or increases in consumption by purchasers and changes in
governmental regulations or taxation.
References to "resources," "Contingent Resources" and "Prospective Resources" in this Annual Information
Form do not constitute, and should be distinguished from, references to "reserves". Reserves are estimated
remaining quantities of oil and natural gas and related substances anticipated to be recoverable from known
accumulations, as of a given date, based on the analysis of drilling, geological, geophysical, and engineering data;
the use of established technology; and specified economic conditions, which are generally accepted as being
reasonable. Contingent Resources are those quantities of petroleum estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially
- 45 -
recoverable from known accumulations using established technology or technology under development, but which
are not currently considered to be commercially recoverable due to one or more contingencies. Contingencies may
include factors such as economic, legal, environmental, political and regulatory matters, or lack of markets. Not all
technically feasible development plans will be commercial. The commercial viability of a development project is
dependent on the forecast of fiscal conditions over the life of the project. For Contingent Resources the risk
component relating to the likelihood that an accumulation will be commercially developed is referred to as the
"chance of development." Prospective resources are those quantities of petroleum estimated, as of a given date, to
be potentially recoverable from undiscovered accumulations by application of future development projects.
Prospective resources have both an associated chance of discovery and a chance of development. Not all
exploration projects will result in discoveries. The chance that an exploration project will result in the discovery of
petroleum is referred to as the "chance of discovery." Thus, for an undiscovered accumulation the chance of
commerciality is the product of two risk components - the chance of discovery and the chance of development. The
estimates of Prospective Resources contained in this Annual Information Form have been risked for the chance of
discovery and hence are considered partially risked estimates.
The Corporation's cash flow and earnings growth are highly dependent upon the Corporation developing its
current reserve base and converting its resource base to reserves and production.
The Corporation's reserves, resources and production and, therefore, the Corporation's cash flow and
earnings, are dependent upon the Corporation developing its current reserve and resource base to production and
cash flow and discovering or acquiring additional reserves and resources. To the extent that cash flow from
operations is insufficient and external sources of capital become limited or unavailable, the Corporation's ability to
make the necessary capital investments to maintain and expand its reserves and resources will be impaired. There
can be no assurance that the Corporation will be able to find and develop or acquire additional reserves and
resources to replace production at commercially feasible costs.
Risks Relating to the Refinery
The Corporation's refining operations and sales are subject to a number of seasonal factors which may impact its
financial performance.
The Refinery is subject to a number of seasonal factors which may cause product sales revenues to vary
throughout the year. The Refinery's primary asphalt market is paving for road construction, which is predominantly
a summer demand. Consequently, prices and volumes for the Corporation's asphalt tend to be higher in the summer
and lower in the colder seasons. During the winter, most of the Refinery's asphalt production is stored in tankage for
sale in the subsequent summer. Seasonal factors also affect the prices of gasoline, demand for which is generally
higher in summer months and distillate and diesel, for which demand is generally higher in winter months. As a
result, inventory levels, inventory values, sales volumes and prices can be expected to fluctuate on a seasonal basis.
Refinery operations are subject to numerous operational hazards and other risks against which the Corporation
may not be insured. These risks may interrupt operations, damage facilities or personnel, or interrupt cash flow.
The operation of the Refinery will be subject to the customary hazards of transporting and processing
hydrocarbons, such as fires, explosions, gaseous leaks, migration of harmful substances, or oil and product spills.
As well the Corporation could experience significant loss as a result of catastrophic events such as fire, flood,
earthquakes, or storms. A casualty occurrence might result in the loss of equipment or life, as well as injury or
property damage. The Corporation will not carry insurance with respect to all potential casualty occurrences and
disruptions. It cannot be assured that the Corporation's insurance will be sufficient to cover any such casualty
occurrences or disruptions. The Corporation's operations could be interrupted by natural disasters or other events
beyond its control. Losses or liabilities arising from uninsured or under insured events could have a material
adverse effect on the Refinery and on the Corporation's business, financial condition and results of operations.
The labour force is limited and the Corporation may not be able to hire all of the labour force required at the
compensation levels budgeted for or at all.
The Refinery operates in Great Falls, Montana, which has a small population base and a limited supply of
skilled labourers and operators. The demographics of the Refinery's labour force are skewed towards those closer to
retirement. It may be difficult to find or attract to Great Falls workforce qualified replacements. In addition, rising
- 46 -
personnel costs could result in increases in general and administrative expenses and labour costs which may
adversely affect the Corporation's cash flow and earnings.
Abandonment costs relating to the Refinery have not been estimated and recorded.
The Corporation has not recorded an asset retirement obligation for the Refinery as it is currently the
Corporation's intent to maintain and upgrade the Refinery so that it will be operational for the foreseeable future.
Consequently, it is not possible at the present time to estimate a date or range of dates for settlement of any asset
retirement obligation related to the Refinery.
The Corporation's volatility of Refinery margins will fluctuate with changes in the supply and demand for refined
products and certain other factors.
The Corporation will face certain risks associated with the volatility of refinery margins. Refinery
operations are sensitive to wholesale and retail margins for refined products, including asphalt, jet fuel, diesel,
gasoline and other products. Margin volatility is influenced by overall marketplace competitiveness, general
economic conditions in the areas the Corporation sells products, the operation of other refineries within the
Corporation's market area, weather, the cost of crude oil and fluctuations in supply and demand for refined products.
New U.S. government standards on content of refined products may result in substantial capital expenditures to
meet environmental regulations.
An initiative of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on gasoline has imposed reductions in benzene
content, volatility, sulphur, and other parameters. The U.S. Congress is also proposing a number of environmental
initiatives related to greenhouse gases and biofuels. These new requirements, other requirements of the
U.S. Federal
Clean Air Act
, or other presently existing or future environmental regulations could require the Corporation to
expend substantial amounts to permit the Refinery to produce products that meet such requirements.
Risks Relating to Third Parties
The Corporation may be subject to conflicting interests with joint venture partners
Management of the Corporation may attempt to identify industry participants and negotiate transactions
whereby other enterprises will join with the Corporation to conduct joint venture activity to develop the
Corporation's oil sands properties. Current capital market conditions make this process more challenging and time
consuming than under more buoyant economic circumstances, resulting in the Corporation possibly having to bring
participants into its planned activities on less attractive terms than might otherwise have been negotiated. There can
be no assurances as to the timing or completion of related terms of possible joint venture arrangements.
Joint venture arrangements must be negotiated with third parties who will generally have objectives and
interests that may not coincide with Connacher's interests and may conflict Connacher's interests. Unless the parties
are able to compromise these conflicting objectives and interests in a mutually acceptable manner, arrangements
with these third parties will not be consummated.
In certain circumstances, the concurrence of joint venture partners may be required for various actions.
Other parties influencing the timing of events may have priorities that differ from Connacher's, even if they
generally share Connacher's objectives. Demands by or expectations of joint venture partners and others may affect
Connacher's participation in such projects or its ability to obtain or maintain necessary licenses and other approvals
or the timing of undertaking various activities or operations.
The Corporation is subject to third party credit risks through its contractual arrangements.
The Corporation may be exposed to third party credit risk through its contractual arrangements with its
current and future joint venture partners that are marketers of its crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, natural gas liquids
production and its refined petroleum products. In the event such entities fail to meet their contractual obligations to
the Corporation, such failures could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation and its cash flow from
operations. In addition, poor credit condition in the industry and of a potential joint venture partner may impact a
potential joint venture partner's willingness to participate in a future Connacher capital program.
- 47 -
The Corporation is subject to extensive government regulation. The Corporation may have to expend substantial
amounts for compliance with regulations or the Corporation may become liable for failure to comply with
regulations.
The oil and gas industry in Canada, including the oil sands industry, operates under Canadian federal,
provincial and municipal legislation and regulation governing such matters as land tenure, prices, royalties,
production rates, environmental protection controls, income, the exportation of crude oil, natural gas and other
products, the use of sub-surface water in the Corporation's operations, as well as other matters. The industry is also
subject to regulation by federal, provincial and municipal governments in such matters as the awarding or
acquisition of exploration and production rights, oil sands or other interests, the imposition of specific drilling
obligations, environmental protection controls, control over the development and abandonment of fields and mine
sites (including restrictions on production) and possibly expropriation or cancellation of contract rights.
Government regulations may be changed from time to time in response to economic or political conditions.
The exercise of discretion by governmental authorities under existing regulations, the implementation of new
regulations or the modification of existing regulations affecting the crude oil and natural gas industry could reduce
demand for crude oil and natural gas, increase the Corporation's costs and have a material adverse impact on the
Corporation.
To date, the Corporation believes Pod One and the Algar Project have received all of the approvals
currently required. However, before proceeding with future phases at Great Divide, the Corporation must obtain all
required regulatory approvals. The regulatory approval process can involve stakeholder consultation, environmental
impact assessments, public hearings and appeals to tribunals and courts, among other things. In addition, regulatory
approvals may be subject to conditions including security deposit obligations and other commitments. Failure to
obtain regulatory approvals, or failure to obtain them on a timely basis, could result in delays or restructuring of the
project and increased costs, all of which could have a material adverse affect on the Corporation. Pod One, Algar
and ongoing exploration activity are also subject to periodic inspections by regulatory authorities to ensure the
Corporation's compliance with the conditions of regulatory approvals. Negative inspection results may lead to the
imposition of fines or penalties or the suspension or rescission of the project's regulatory approvals.
The Corporation's operating cash flow will be directly affected by the applicable royalty regime.
The Government of Alberta receives royalties on production of natural resources from lands in which it
owns the mineral rights.
A change in the royalty regime resulting in an increase in royalties would reduce the Corporation's earnings
and could make future capital expenditures or the Corporation's operations uneconomic and could, in the event of a
material increase in royalties, make it more difficult to service and repay the Corporation's debt. Any material
increase in royalties would also significantly reduce the value of the Corporation's associated assets.
The Corporation's operations will depend on infrastructure owned and operated by third parties and on services
provided by third parties. Failure by these third parties to provide infrastructure and services required by the
Corporation could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation's business and results of operations.
The Corporation depends on certain infrastructure owned and operated or to be constructed by others and
on services provided by third parties, including, without limitation, processing facilities, pipelines or rail lines for
the transportation of products to the market, natural gas, disposal pipelines and electrical grid transmission lines for
the provision and/or sale of electricity to the Corporation. The failure of any or all of these third parties to supply
utilities, services, or in connection with Pod One and subsequent projects including the Algar Project, to construct
necessary infrastructure, on a timely basis and on acceptable commercial terms will negatively impact the
Corporation's operations and financial results. Generally, the Corporation also depends on third parties to provide
numerous services to it in connection with its Refinery and conventional crude oil and natural gas operations,
including transportation services, drilling and well services, and the failure of such third parties to provide such
services will also negatively impact the Corporation's operations and financial results.
The Corporation plans on trucking diluent to, and dilbit from, Great Divide to markets in the short term and
is also investigating rail and pipeline alternatives. The ability to deliver diluent to Great Divide and ship dilbit to
- 48 -
markets is dependent on, among other things, access to trucks and drivers, accidents, weather delay and general road
conditions. Delays or the inability to deliver diluent to Great Divide or ship dilbit to market could have a negative
impact on the Corporation's results of operations and cash flow.
Changes in tax laws may adversely affect the Corporation, Pod One and future expansion phases.
Income tax laws or government incentive programs relating to the oil and gas industry and in particular the
oil sands sector may in the future be changed or interpreted in a manner that adversely affects the Corporation, its
operations and future expansion plans.
The Corporation's industry is highly competitive and many of its competitors have greater resources than the
Corporation does.
The Canadian and international petroleum industry is highly competitive in all aspects, including the
exploration for, and the development of, new sources of supply, the acquisition of crude oil and natural gas interests
and the distribution and marketing of petroleum products. The Corporation will compete with producers of bitumen,
synthetic crude oil blends and other producers of conventional crude oil and natural gas. Some of the conventional
producers have lower operating costs than the Corporation is anticipated to have, and many of them have greater
resources than the Corporation has. Certain of the Corporation's competitors may have greater resources to source,
attract, and retain the personnel, materials and services that the Corporation will require to conduct its operations or
to conduct expansions of the Refinery or at Great Divide. The petroleum industry also competes with other
industries in supplying energy, fuel and related products to consumers.
A number of companies other than the Corporation have announced plans to enter the oil sands business
and begin production of bitumen, or expand existing operations. Expansion of existing operations and development
of new projects could materially increase the supply of bitumen or synthetic crude oil and other competing crude oil
products in the marketplace. Depending on the levels of future demand, increased supplies could have a negative
impact on prices of bitumen and, accordingly, the Corporation's results of operations and cash flow.
Risks Relating to the Corporation's Investment in Petrolifera
The Corporation is subject to foreign political, economic and other uncertainties relating to its investment in
Petrolifera.
Petrolifera's operations may be adversely affected by changes in government policies and legislation or
social instability and other factors which are not within the control of Petrolifera including, among other things, a
change in crude oil or natural gas pricing policy, the risks of war, terrorism, abduction, expropriation,
nationalization, renegotiation or nullification of existing concessions and contracts, taxation policies, economic
sanctions, the imposition of specific drilling obligations and the development and abandonment of fields. In
addition, the crude oil and natural gas produced by Petrolifera in Argentina must, unless certain circumstances exist,
be sold locally at rates that may not be comparable to international rates.
Petrolifera's results of operation and the value of the Corporation's investment in Petrolifera are subject to
political, economic, and other uncertainties, including, but not limited to, expropriation, changes in energy policies
or the personnel administering them, currency fluctuations and devaluations, exchange controls and royalty and tax
increases. In the event of a dispute arising in connection with Petrolifera's operations in Argentina, Peru or
Colombia, Petrolifera may be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of foreign courts or may not be successful in
subjecting foreign persons to the jurisdictions of the courts of Canada or enforcing Canadian judgements in such
other jurisdictions. Petrolifera may also be hindered or prevented from enforcing its rights with respect to a
governmental instrumentality because of the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Accordingly, Petrolifera's exploration,
development and production activities in Argentina, Peru and Colombia could be substantially affected by factors
beyond Petrolifera's control, any of which could have a material adverse effect on Petrolifera's results of operations,
which would have an impact on the Corporation's results of operations, and on the value of the Corporation's
investment.
- 49 -
Current global stock markets have been subject to increased volatility.
Current global financial conditions have been subject to increased volatility and the trading price of
Petrolifera common shares has been adversely affected. This market volatility, may cause decreases in values that
are deemed to be other than temporary, which may result in impairment losses. If these increased levels of volatility
and market turmoil continue, the Corporation could experience permanent declines in the market value of
investment holdings which could result in an impairment charge to its earnings.
The Corporation does not control the Board of Directors of Petrolifera, and accordingly Petrolifera may take
actions contrary to those desired by Connacher.
The Corporation owns approximately 22 percent of the outstanding common shares of Petrolifera and
currently has three representatives, including its Chief Executive Officer, who is also the Executive Chairman of
Petrolifera, on the Board of Directors of Petrolifera. The Corporation's ownership is not sufficient to elect a
majority of the Board of Directors and the Corporation has no contractual rights related thereto. Additionally,
Petrolifera's management is independent of the Corporation's Management with the exception that Richard A.
Gusella is Executive Chairman of Petrolifera and Connacher's President and Chief Executive Officer. The directors
and officers of Petrolifera have a fiduciary obligation to act in the best interest of Petrolifera. As such, decisions
made by the directors and/or officers of Petrolifera may cause Petrolifera to undertake strategies or courses of action
that may not be consistent with the Corporation's short or long term objectives.
In addition, if Mr. Gusella is unable to devote his full time and undivided attention to the Corporation's
affairs this may have a material adverse effect on the Corporation.
Other Risks Affecting the Corporation's Business
The Corporation is required to adopt International Financial Reporting Standards.
Canadian public companies are required to prepare their financial statements in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards ("
IFRS
"), as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board
(IASB), for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. While the Corporation has commenced its IFRS conversion project, completion of the conversion from GAAP to IFRS will require significant time and expense and the Corporation currently operates with a small staff of accounting personnel. As a consequence, additional personnel or contractors may be required to assist the Corporation in the conversion process and access to such qualified personnel may be limited given the mandated adoption of IFRS by all Canadian public companies. In addition, IFRS will result in the adoption of certain new accounting policies relative to GAAP and increased financial statement disclosure as compared to GAAP. The differences between these accounting policies may impact the Corporation's consolidated financial statements and the Corporation's financial position and results of operations. As at the date of this Annual Information Form, the impact of these new accounting policies has not be determined but the evaluation is continuing. Additionally, enhancements or alterations may be required to the Corporation's disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting.
Terrorist attacks and the threat of terrorist attacks may have an adverse impact on the oil and gas industry
and energy infrastructure.
The long-term impact of terrorist attacks in the United States, such as the attacks on September 11, 2001,
and in Canada and the threat of future terrorist attacks on the oil and gas industry and energy infrastructure in
general, and on the Corporation in particular, is not known at this time. The possibility that the oil and gas industry
and energy infrastructure facilities may be direct targets of, or indirect casualties of, an act of terror and the
implementation of security measures which may be taken as a precaution against possible terrorist attacks will result
in increased costs to the Corporation's business.
There are potential conflicts of interest to which some of the Corporation's directors and officers will be
subject in connection with the Corporation's operations.
Some of the directors and officers of the Corporation are engaged and will continue to be engaged in the
search of oil and gas interests on their own behalf and on behalf of other corporations, and situations may arise
where the directors and officers will be in direct competition with the Corporation. From time to time, the
- 50 -
Corporation may jointly participate in exploration and development activities with one or more corporations with
which a director or officer of the Corporation may be involved. Additionally, the Corporation's President and Chief
Executive Officer is also an officer and director of Petrolifera and two of the Corporation's other directors are
directors of Petrolifera. These individuals receive compensation from Petrolifera for their services. Conflicts of
interest, if any, which arise will be subject to and be governed by procedures prescribed by the ABCA which require
a director or officer of a corporation who is a party to or is a director or an officer of or has a material interest in any
person who is a party to a material contract or proposed material contract with the Corporation to disclose his
interest and to refrain from voting on any matter in respect of such contract unless otherwise permitted under the
ABCA.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There are no material legal proceedings against the Corporation.
INTERESTS OF EXPERTS
Each of Sayer and GLJ have prepared a report or valuation described herein. Neither Sayer nor GLJ held
any interests in securities or other property of Connacher when it prepared its respective report or valuation, has
received any such interest since such time or will receive any such interest. No director, officer or employee of
Sayer or GLJ is to be elected, appointed or employed by Connacher.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Additional information, including information as to directors' and officers' remuneration and indebtedness,
principal holders of the Corporation's securities and securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation
plans, if applicable, is contained in the Management Information Circular of the Corporation prepared in connection
with the most recent annual meeting of shareholders of the Corporation that involved the election of directors.
Additional financial information is provided in the Corporation's financial statements and management discussion
and analysis for the year ended December 31, 2009, which are contained in the Annual Report of the Corporation for
the year ended December 31, 2009.
Copies of this Annual Information Form, the Corporation's Annual Report, any interim financial statements
of the Corporation subsequent to those statements contained in the Annual Report, the Corporation's Management
Information Circular and other additional information relating to the Corporation are available on SEDAR at
www.sedar.com
.
- 1 -
SCHEDULE A
REPORT ON RESERVES DATA BY
INDEPENDENT QUALIFIED RESERVES EVALUATOR OR AUDITOR
To the board of directors of Connacher Oil and Gas Limited (the "
Company
"):
1.
We have prepared an evaluation of the Company's reserves data as at December 31, 2009. The reserves
data are estimates of proved reserves and probable reserves and related future net revenue as at December 31, 2009, estimated using forecast prices and costs.
2.
The reserves data are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the reserves data based on our evaluation. We carried out our evaluation in accordance with standards set out in the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook (the "
COGE Handbook
") prepared jointly by the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers
(Calgary Chapter) and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy & Petroleum (Petroleum Society).
3.
Those standards require that we plan and perform an evaluation to obtain reasonable assurance as to
whether the reserves data are free of material misstatement. An evaluation also includes assessing whether the reserves data are in accordance with principles and definitions in the COGE Handbook.
4.
The following table sets forth the estimated future net revenue (before deduction of income taxes)
attributed to proved plus probable reserves, estimated using forecast prices and costs and calculated using a discount rate of 10 percent, included in the reserves data of the Company evaluated by us for the year ended December 31, 2009, and identifies the respective portions thereof that we have audited, evaluated and reviewed and reported on to the Company's board of directors:
Independent Qualified
Reserves Evaluator
Description and
Preparation Date of
Evaluation Report
Location of
Reserves (Country
or Foreign
Geographic Area)
Net Present Value of Future Net Revenue
(before income taxes, 10% discount rate - $M)
Audited Evaluated Reviewed Total
GLJ Petroleum Consultants February 3, 2010 Canada - 2,155,582 - 2,155,582
5.
In our opinion, the reserves data evaluated by us have, in all material respects, been determined and are in
accordance with the COGE Handbook.
6.
We have no responsibility to update our reports referred to in paragraph 4 for events and circumstances
occurring after their respective preparation dates.
7.
Because the reserves data are based on judgments regarding future events, actual results will vary and the
variations may be material. However, any variations should be consistent with the fact that reserves are categorized according to the probability of their recovery. EXECUTED as to our report referred to above: GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd., Calgary, Alberta, Canada, February 12, 2010. (Signed) "Dana B. Laustsen, P.Eng
"
- 2 - REPORT ON RESOURCES DATA BY INDEPENDENT QUALIFIED RESERVES EVALUATOR OR AUDITOR To the board of directors of Connacher Oil and Gas Limited (the "Company"): 1.
We have prepared an evaluation of the Company's resources data as at December 31, 2009. The resources
data are estimates of low, best and high estimates of contingent and prospective resources and related future net revenue as at December 31, 2009, estimated using forecast prices and costs.
2.
The resources data are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the resources data based on our evaluation. We carried out our evaluation in accordance with standards set out in the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook (the "
COGE Handbook
") prepared jointly by the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers
(Calgary Chapter) and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy & Petroleum (Petroleum Society).
3.
Those standards require that we plan and perform an evaluation to obtain reasonable assurance as to
whether the resources data are free of material misstatement. An evaluation also includes assessing whether the resources data are in accordance with principles and definitions in the COGE Handbook.
4.
The following table sets forth the estimated future net revenue of the Company (before deduction of
income taxes) attributed to best estimate contingent resources and best estimate prospective resources, estimated using forecast prices and costs and calculated using a discount rate of 10 percent, evaluated by us for the year ended December 31, 2009, and identifies the respective portions thereof that we have audited, evaluated and reviewed and reported on to the Company's board of directors:
Independent Qualified
Reserves Evaluator and
Resource Category
Description and
Preparation Date of
Evaluation Report
Location of
Reserves (Country
or Foreign
Geographic Area)
Net Present Value of Future Net Revenue
(before income taxes, 10% discount rate - $M)
Audited Evaluated Reviewed Total
Contingent Resources
GLJ Petroleum Consultants
February 3, 2010
Canada
-
383,530
-
383,530
Prospective Resources
GLJ Petroleum Consultants
February 3, 2010
Canada
-
235,825
-
235,825
5.
In our opinion, the resources data respectively evaluated by us have, in all material respects, been
determined and are in accordance with the COGE Handbook.
6.
We have no responsibility to update our reports referred to in paragraph 4 for events and circumstances
occurring after their respective preparation dates.
7.
Because the resources data are based on judgements regarding future events, actual results will vary and the
variations may be material. However, any variations should be consistent with the fact that resources are categorized according to the probability of their recovery.
8.
Contingent resources evaluated in this report were assigned in regions with lower core-hole drilling density
than the reserve regions and are outside current areas of application for development. These resource estimates are not classified as reserves at this time, pending further reservoir delineation, project - 3 - application, facility and reservoir design work. Contingent resources entail commercial risk not applicable to reserves, which have not been included in the net present valuation. There is no certainty that it will be commercially viable to produce any portion of the contingent resources.
9.
Prospective resources were assigned in unexplored regions of the Company's acreage. The prospective
resource estimates have been risked for the chance of discovery, hence are considered partially risked estimates. Prospective resources also entail commercial risk not applicable to reserves, which have not been included in the net present valuation. There is no certainty that any portion of the prospective resources will be discovered. If discovered, there is no certainty that it will be commercially viable to produce any portion of the prospective resources. EXECUTED as to our report referred to above: GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd., Calgary, Alberta, Canada, February 12, 2010. (Signed)
"Dana B. Laustsen, P.Eng
"
- 1 - SCHEDULE B REPORT OF MANAGEMENT AND DIRECTORS ON OIL AND GAS DISCLOSURE Management of Connacher Oil and Gas Limited (the "
Corporation
") are responsible for the preparation
and disclosure of information with respect to the Corporation's oil and gas activities in accordance with securities regulatory requirements. This information includes reserves data, which are estimates of proved reserves and probable reserves and related future net revenue as at December 31, 2009, estimated using forecast prices and costs. An independent qualified reserves evaluator has evaluated the Corporation's reserves data. The report of the independent qualified reserves evaluator is presented in Schedule A and will be filed with securities regulatory authorities concurrently with this report. The Reserves Committee of the board of directors of the Corporation has (a) reviewed the Corporation's procedures for providing information to the independent qualified reserves evaluator; (b) met with the independent qualified reserves evaluator to determine whether any restrictions affected the ability of the independent qualified reserves evaluator to report without reservation; and (c) reviewed the reserves data with management and the independent qualified reserves evaluator. The Reserves Committee of the board of directors has reviewed the Corporation's procedures for assembling and reporting other information associated with oil and gas activities and has reviewed that information with management. The board of directors has, on the recommendation of the Reserves Committee, approved (a) the content and filing with securities regulatory authorities of Form 51-101F1 containing reserves data and other oil and gas information; (b) the filing of Forms 51-101F2 which are the reports of the independent qualified reserves evaluator on the reserves and resources data; and (c) the content and filing of this report. Because the reserves data are based on judgements regarding future events, actual results will vary and the variations may be material. However, any variations should be consistent with the fact that reserves are categorized according to the probability of their recovery. (signed)
Richard A. Gusella (signed)
Colin M. Evans
Richard A. Gusella Colin M. Evans President and Chief Executive Officer Director (signed)
Richard R. Kines (signed)
W.C. Seth
Richard R. Kines W.C. Seth Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer Director March 19, 2010 - 1 - SCHEDULE C CONNACHER'S 22 PERCENT INTEREST IN PETROLIFERA'S OIL AND GAS RESERVES AND FUTURE NET REVENUE The following is a summary of the Corporation's 22 percent interest in Petrolifera's oil and gas reserves and future net revenue as at December 31, 2009 as evaluated by GLJ in the Petrolifera GLJ Report. The information contained within this Schedule C has been derived from the Petrolifera AIF which is posted on SEDAR (
www.sedar.com
).
SUMMARY OF OIL AND GAS RESERVES
(9)
Light/Medium Crude Oil Natural Gas Natural Gas Liquids
Reserves Category
Gross
(1)
(Mbbl)
Net
(1)
(Mbbl)
Gross
(1)
(MMcf)
Net
(1)
(MMcf)
Gross
(1)
(Mbbl)
Net
(1)
(Mbbl)
Proved Developed Producing
(2)(7)
Argentina 855 739 1,159 986 26 22
Colombia - - - - - -
Total Proved Developed Producing
855 739 1,159 986 26 22
Proved Developed Non-Producing
(2)(6)
Argentina 21 18 7 6 - -
Colombia - - - - - -
Total Proved Developed Non-Producing
21 18 7 6 - -
Proved Undeveloped
(2)(8)
Argentina 769 663 648 560 15 13
Colombia - - - - - -
Total Proved Undeveloped
769 663 648 560 15 13
Total Proved
(2)
Argentina 1,645 1,420 1,814 1,553 41 35
Colombia - - - - - -
Total Proved
1,645 1,420 1,814 1,553 41 35
Total Probable
(3)
Argentina 1,180 1,021 1,402 1,195 27 23
Colombia 154 140 289 267 - -
Total Probable
1,334 1,161 1,690 1,462 27 23
Total Proved Plus Probable
(2)(3)
Argentina 2,825 2,441 3,216 2,747 69 59
Colombia 154 140 289 267 - -
Total Proved Plus Probable
2,979 2,581 3,504 3,014 69 59
Total Possible
(4)
Argentina 962 830 2,239 1,901 27 23
Colombia 317 289 596 552 - -
Total Possible
1,280 1,119 2,835 2,452 27 23
Total Proved Plus Probable Plus Possible
(2)(3)(4)
Argentina 3,788 3,271 5,455 4,648 96 81
Colombia 471 429 884 819 - -
Total Proved Plus Probable Plus Possible
4,259 3,700 6,339 5,467 96 81
- 2 -
SUMMARY OF NET PRESENT VALUES OF FUTURE NET REVENUE
(9)
Before Deducting Income Taxes
Discounted At
After Deducting Income Taxes
Discounted At
Unit Value Before
Income Tax
Discounted at
10%/year
Reserves Category (M$) 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20%
($/boe) ($/Mcfe)
Proved Developed Producing
(2)(7)
Argentina 25,136 22,642 20,636 18,992 17,619 24,354 21,892 19,916 18,298 16,950 22.30 3.72
Colombia - - - - -- - - - - - - -
Total Proved Developed Producing
25,136 22,642 20,636 18,992 17,619 24,354 21,892 19,916 18,298 16,950 22.30 3.72
Proved Developed Non-Producing
(2)(6)
Argentina 593 499 424 364 314 449 365 299 246 204 22.10 3.68
Colombia - - - - -- - - - - - - -
Total Proved Developed Non-Producing
593 499 424 364 314 449 365 299 246 204 22.10 3.68
Proved Undeveloped
(2)(8)
Argentina 21,759 16,803 13,188 10,494 8,446 14,860 10,931 8,099 6,016 4,456 17.14 2.86
Colombia - - - - -- - - - - - - -
Total Proved Undeveloped
21,759 16,803 13,188 10,494 8,446 14,860 10,931 8,099 6,016 4,456 17.14 2.86
Total Proved
(2)
Argentina 47,485 39,943 34,249 29,849 26,380 39,663 33,188 28,314 24,560 21,609 19.98 3.33
Colombia - - - - -- - - - - - - -
Total Proved
47,485 39,943 34,249 29,849 26,380 39,663 33,188 28,314 24,560 21,609 19.98 3.33
Total Probable
(3)
Argentina 43,505 30,396 22,136 16,702 12,986 28,430 19,703 14,207 10,597 8,136 17.81 2.97
Colombia 2,634 1,229 211 (532) (1,075) 2,634 1,229 211 (532) (1,075) (1.04) (0.19)
Total Probable
46,140 31,625 22,347 16,170 11,912 31,064 20,932 14,418 10,065 7,061 15.65 2.61
Total Proved Plus Probable
(2)(3)
Argentina 90,990 70,339 56,384 46,550 39,367 68,092 52,891 42,521 35,157 29,745 19.07 3.18
Colombia 2,634 1,229 211 (532) (1,074) 2,634 1,229 211 (532) (1,074) (1.04) (0.19)
Total Proved Plus Probable
93,624 71,568 56,595 46,019 38,292 70,726 54,120 42,732 34,625 28,670 18.01 3.00
Total Possible
(4)
Argentina 34,898 22,898 15,752 11,283 8,366 22,753 14,661 9,864 6,883 4,953 13.47 2.24
Colombia 21,377 15,257 11,164 8,352 6,372 16,101 11,421 8,300 6,162 4,662 29.30 4.88
Total Possible
56,275 38,155 26,916 19,634 14,737 38,854 26,081 18,164 13,045 9,615 17.36 2.89
Total Proved Plus Probable Plus Possible
(2)(3)(4)
Argentina 125,888 93,237 72,136 57,833 47,732 90,845 67,552 52,385 42,040 34,698 17.48 2.91
Colombia 24,011 16,486 11,375 7,820 5,297 18,735 12,650 8,510 5,630 3,588 20.11 3.35
Total Proved Plus Probable Plus Possible
149,900 109,723 83,511 65,653 53,029 109,580 80,201 60,895 47,670 38,286 17.80 2.97
TOTAL FUTURE NET REVENUE (UNDISCOUNTED)
(9)
Reserves Category (M$)
Revenue Royalties
Operating Expenses Development Costs Abandonment Costs Future Net Revenue Before Income Taxes Income Taxes Future Net Revenue After Income Taxes Total Proved
(2)
Argentina 98,993 13,602 27,480 9,674 752 47,485 7,822 39,663
Colombia - - - - - - - -
Total
98,993 13,602 27,480 9,674 752 47,485 7,822 39,663
Total Proved Plus Probable
(2)(3)
Argentina 176,327 24,130 45,848 14,407 953 90,990 22,898 68,092
Colombia 14,760 1,291 1,750 9,033 53 2,634 - 2,634
Total
191,087 25,420 47,597 23,439 1,006 93,625 22,898 70,726
Total Proved Plus Probable Plus Possible
(2)(3)(4)
Argentina 243,579 33,491 60,342 22,740 1,117 125,888 35,043 90,845
Colombia 46,879 4,113 5,349 13,321 85 24,011 5,276 18,735
Total
290,459 37,604 65,690 36,062 1,203 149,900 40,319 109,580
- 3 -
Notes:
(1) "Gross Reserves" are the Corporation's working interest (operating or non-operating) share before deduction of royalties and without
including any royalty interests of the Corporation. "Net Reserves" are the Corporation's working interest (operating or non-operating)
share after deduction of royalty obligations plus the reporting issuer's royalty interests in reserves.
(2) "Proved" reserves are those reserves that can be estimated with a high degree of certainty to be recoverable. It is likely that the actual
remaining quantities recovered will exceed the estimated proved reserves.
(3) "Probable" reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves. It is equally likely that the
actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the sum of the estimated proved plus probable reserves.
(4) "Possible" reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than probable reserves. It is unlikely that the actual
remaining quantities recovered will exceed the sum of the estimated proved plus probable plus possible reserves.
(5) "Developed" reserves are those reserves that are expected to be recovered from existing wells and installed facilities or, if facilities have
not been installed, that would involve a low expenditure (for example when compared to the cost of drilling a well) to put the reserves on
production.
(6) "Developed Non-Producing" reserves are those reserves that either have not been on production, or have previously been on production but
are shut in and the date of resumption of production is unknown.
(7) "Developed Producing" reserves are those reserves that are expected to be recovered from completion intervals open at the time of the
estimate. These reserves may be currently producing or, if shut in, they must have previously been on production, and the date of
resumption of production must be known with reasonable certainty.
(8) "Undeveloped" reserves are those reserves expected to be recovered from known accumulations where a significant expenditure (for
example, when compared to the cost of drilling a well) is required to render them capable of production. They must fully meet the
requirements of the reserves classification (proved, probable, possible) to which they are assigned.
(9) The pricing assumptions used in the Petrolifera GLJ Report with respect to the inflation rates used for operating and capital costs and
exchange rates are set forth below and are as at December 31, 2009.
Inflation Rate Exchange Rate
%/year $US/$Cdn
Year Forecast
2010 2.0 0.95
2011 2.0 0.95
2012 2.0 0.95
2013 2.0 0.95
2014 2.0 0.95
2015 2.0 0.95
2016 2.0 0.95
2017 2.0 0.95
2018 2.0 0.95
2019 2.0 0.95
Thereafter
The crude oil price received by Petrolifera in Argentina is dependent on the price level of WTI and the domestic price of oil in Argentina.
The crude oil price received by Petrolifera in Colombia is based on world prices.
Forecast prices assumptions relating to crude oil, natural gas and NGL are as follows:
Light and Medium Crude Oil Natural Gas NGL
Argentina Crude Oil Price
($Cdn/bbl)
WTI Crude Oil
Price
($Cdn/bbl)
Argentina Gas
Price
($Cdn/Mcf)
Colombia
Gas Price
($Cdn/Mcf)
Argentina NGL
Price
($Cdn/bbl)
Year Forecast
2010 52.50 84.21 2.81 4.74 39.09
2011 53.68 87.37 2.86 4.83 39.92
2012 54.76 90.53 2.92 4.93 40.50
2013 55.85 93.68 2.98 5.03 41.39
2014 56.97 96.84 3.04 5.13 42.22
2015 58.11 98.78 3.10 5.23 43.07
2016 59.27 100.76 3.16 5.34 43.93
2017 60.46 102.78 3.22 5.44 44.81
2018 61.67 104.83 3.29 5.55 45.73
2019 62.90 106.93 3.35 5.66 46.56
Thereafter 2.0%/year 2.0%/year 2.0%/year 2.0%/year 2.0%/year
GLJ is an independent qualified reserves evaluator appointed pursuant to NI 51-101.
- 4 -
The following table summarizes Connacher's share of the capital expenditures made by Petrolifera on oil and
natural gas properties for the year ended December 31, 2009:
Property Acquisition Costs
Exploration Costs
(MM$)
Development Costs
(MM$)
Proved Properties
(MM$)
Unproved Properties
(MM$)
Argentina - - 3.5 2.5
Peru - - 1.7 -
Colombia - 0.2 8.0 -
- 1 -
SCHEDULE D
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
The Audit Committee (the "
Committee") of the board of directors (the "Board
") of Connacher Oil and Gas Limited
(the "
Corporation
") shall have the oversight responsibility, authority and specific duties as described below.
Composition
The Committee will be comprised of three or more directors as determined by the Board. Each Committee member
shall satisfy the independence, financial literacy and experience requirements of applicable securities laws, rules or
guidelines, any applicable stock exchange requirements or guidelines and any other applicable regulatory rules. In
particular, each member of the Committee shall have no direct or indirect material relationship with the Corporation
which could reasonably be expected to materially interfere with the member's independent judgment.
Determinations as to whether a particular Director satisfies the requirements for membership on the Committee shall
be made by the full Board and shall be reviewed at least annually.
Members of the Committee shall be appointed from time to time by the Board. Each member shall serve until his
successor is appointed, unless he shall resign or be removed by the Board or he shall otherwise cease to be a director
of the Corporation. If a member of the Committee ceases to be independent for reasons outside that member's
reasonable control, the member shall immediately notify the Chair of the Board as to this fact and shall resign his or
her position as a member of the Committee on the earliest of (i) the appointment of his or her successor; (ii) the next
annual meeting of shareholders of the Corporation; and (iii) the date that is six months from the occurrence of the
event which caused the member to not be independent. The Board shall fill any vacancy if the membership of the
Committee is less than three Directors.
The Chair of the Committee may be designated by the Board or, if it does not do so, the members of the Committee
may elect a Chair by vote of a majority of the full Committee membership.
Operation
The Committee shall have access to such officers and employees of the Corporation and to the Corporation's
independent external auditors, and to such information respecting the Corporation, as it considers to be necessary or
advisable in order to perform its duties and responsibilities. The Committee has the authority to engage independent
counsel and other advisors as it determines necessary to carry out its duties and to set and pay the compensation for
any such counsel and advisors, such engagement to be for the Corporation's sole account and expense.
Meetings of the Committee shall be conducted as follows:
1.
The Committee shall meet at least four times annually at such times and at such locations as the Chair of
the Committee shall determine, provided that meetings shall be scheduled so as to permit timely review of the quarterly and annual financial statements and reports. The independent auditors or any one member of the Committee may also request a meeting of the Committee.
2.
The quorum for meetings shall be a majority of the members of the Committee, present in person or by
telephone or by other telecommunication device that permits all persons participating in the meeting to hear each other.
3.
The Chair shall, in consultation with management and the external auditors, establish the agenda for the
meetings and instruct management to ensure that properly prepared agenda materials are circulated to the Committee with sufficient time for study prior to the meeting.
4.
Every question at a Committee meeting shall be decided by a majority of the votes cast.
5.
The Chief Executive Officer shall be available to advise the Committee, and may attend meetings at the
invitation of the Chair of the Committee. Other management representatives may be invited to attend. The independent external auditors shall be given notice of, and shall be entitled to attend, each meeting of the - 2 - Committee at the expense of the Corporation. The Chair of the Committee shall hold in camera meetings of the Committee, without management present, at every regularly scheduled Committee meeting.
6.
A Committee member, or any other person selected by the Committee, shall be appointed at each meeting
to act as secretary for the purpose of recording the minutes of each meeting.
7.
The Committee may delegate from time to time to any person or committee of persons any of the
Committee's responsibilities that lawfully may be delegated. The Committee provides an avenue for communication, particularly for outside directors, with the independent external auditors and financial and senior management and the Board. The independent external auditors shall have a direct line of communication to the Committee through its Chair. The Committee, through its Chair, may contact directly any employee in the Corporation as it deems necessary, and any employee may bring before the Committee on a confidential basis any matter involving financial practices or transactions.
Responsibilities
The Committee is part of the Board. Its primary function is to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight
responsibilities with respect to: (i) the preparation and disclosure of the financial statements, and accompanying
reports, to be provided to shareholders and regulatory bodies; (ii) the system of internal control and management
information systems of the Corporation that management has established; and (iii) the external audit process. In
addition, the Committee shall assist the Board as requested in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to
(i) financial policies and strategies; (ii) financial risk management practices; and (iii) transactions or circumstances
which could materially affect the financial position or results of operations of the Corporation.
The role of the Committee is one of stewardship and oversight. Management is responsible for preparing the
financial statements and financial reporting of the Corporation and for maintaining internal control and management
information and risk management systems and procedures. The external auditors are responsible for the audit or
review of the financial statements and other services they provide.
The Committee should have a clear understanding with the external auditors that the independent auditors must
maintain an open and transparent relationship with the Committee and the Board, and that the ultimate
accountability of the external auditors is to the shareholders of the Corporation.
The Committee shall provide the Board with a summary of all meetings by way of an oral report delivered by the
Chair of the Committee to the Board. All information reviewed and discussed by the Committee at any meeting
shall be referred to in the minutes and made available for examination by the Board upon request to the Chair.
Specific Duties
1.
Financial Statements and Financial Reporting.
The Committee shall:
(a)
review with management and the external auditors, and recommend to the Board for approval, the
annual financial statements of the Corporation, the reports of the external auditors thereon and related financial reporting, including Management's Discussion and Analysis and financial press releases;
(b)
review with management and the external auditors, and recommend to the Board for approval, the
interim financial statements of the Corporation and related financial reporting, including Management's Discussion and Analysis and financial press releases;
(c)
review with management and recommend to the Board for approval, any financial statements of
the Corporation which have not previously been approved by the Board and which are to be included in a prospectus of the Corporation; - 3 -
(d)
review with management and the external auditors, and recommend to the Board for approval, any
audited financial statements of the Corporation's subsidiaries and reports of the external auditors thereon;
(e)
consider and be satisfied that adequate procedures are in place for the review of the Corporation's
disclosure of financial information extracted or derived from the Corporation's financial statements (other than disclosure referred to in clauses (a) and (b) above), and periodically assess the adequacy of such procedures;
(f)
review with management, the external auditors and, if necessary, legal counsel, any litigation,
claim or contingency, including tax assessments, that could have a material effect upon the financial position of the Corporation, and the manner in which these matters may be, or have been, disclosed in the financial statements;
(g)
review the appropriateness of the accounting practices and policies of the Corporation, the use and
effect of judgment on accounting measurements, the adequacy of accruals and estimates used by management in preparing financial statements and review any proposed changes in accounting policies and procedures;
(h)
review accounting, tax and financial aspects of the operations of the Corporation as the Committee
considers appropriate; and
(i)
include in the annual information form each year, as required, a copy of the Terms of Reference of
the Committee and a report to shareholders on the Committee's activities in satisfying its responsibilities during the year in compliance with these terms of reference.
2.
Relationship with External Auditors.
The Committee shall:
(a)
consider and make a recommendation to the Board as to the appointment or re appointment of the
external auditors, ensuring that such auditors are participants in good standing pursuant to applicable securities laws;
(b)
consider and make a recommendation to the Board as to the compensation of the external auditors;
(c)
review and approve the annual audit plan of the external auditors in respect of the Corporation and
any subsidiaries for which audited financial statements are required;
(d)
oversee the work of the external auditors in performing their audit or review services and oversee
the resolution of any disagreements between management and the external auditors;
(e)
review and discuss with the external auditors all significant relationships that the external auditors
and their affiliates have with the Corporation and its affiliates in order to determine the external auditors' independence, including, without limitation, (A) requesting, receiving and reviewing, on a periodic basis, a formal written statement from the external auditors delineating all relationships that may reasonably be thought to bear on the independence of the external auditors with respect to the Corporation, (B) discussing with the external auditors any disclosed relationships or services that the external auditors believe may affect the objectivity and independence of the external auditors, and (C) recommending that the Board take appropriate action in response to the external auditors' report to satisfy itself of the external auditors' independence;
(f)
pre approve all non audit services (where such non audit services are considered to be above the
de minimus
level referred to in applicable law) to be provided to the Corporation (and any
subsidiaries thereof) by the external auditors and review fee arrangements for such services (the - 4 - Committee may delegate to one or more of its members the authority to pre approve non audit services so long as such pre approval is presented to the full Committee at its first scheduled meeting following such pre approval); and
(g)
review and approve the hiring policies of the Corporation regarding employees and former
employees of the present and former external auditors of the Corporation.
3.
Internal Controls.
The Committee shall:
(a)
review with management and the external auditors, the adequacy and effectiveness of the internal
control and management information systems and procedures of the Corporation (with particular attention given to accounting, financial statements and financial reporting matters) and determine whether the Corporation are in compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements and with the Corporation's policies;
(b)
review the external auditors' recommendations regarding any matters, including internal control
and management information systems and procedures, and management's responses thereto;
(c)
establish procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints, submissions and
concerns regarding accounting, internal controls or auditing matters on an anonymous and confidential basis; and
(d)
review with external auditors any corporate transactions in which Directors or officers of the
Corporation have a personal interest.
4.
Financial Risk Management.
The Committee shall:
(a)
review with management and the external auditors their assessment of significant financial risks
and exposures;
(b)
review and assess the steps that management has taken to mitigate such risks;
(c)
review annually the insurable risks and insurance coverages of the Corporation; and
(d)
report the results of such reviews to the Board for the purpose of assisting the Board in identifying
Dana B. Laustsen, P.Eng.
Executive Vice-President
Dana B. Laustsen, P.Eng.
Executive Vice-President