But then again, as CLL continues to move from pillar to post in a progressive plethora of projects, which never seem to work out, why should any consider that now what they present us with, is the great solution? Their project batting list seems to be a never ending saga of waste and disappointment. I suppose the bright side is that even a blind pig finds an acorn every now and then. An improved batting average on project selection would go a long way towards restoring investor confidence in management credibility. And what expertise exists in the corporate structure in horizontal drilling?

Brian