Starter Pit
posted on
Nov 28, 2011 07:36PM
CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)
Elmer has said that he has targed a 3 year Capex payback on a producing mine. I am hoping that Capex will come in at around $3.8B or less for previously stated reasons.
So a starter pit needs to pay back something in the order of $3.8B (plus financing costs) in three years. A 3 year pit at 120 ktpd production will require about 130 M tonnes of ore.
Does anyone have any ideas about the grade of a potential starter pit?
Looking at the 2008 PFS they have starter pit info in table 25.6....
PFS 2008 Starter Pit info: From the 2008 PFS, pg 246:http://www.copperfoxmetals.com/i/pdf/Updated_Amended_Technical_Report_5.20.10.pdf
Table 25.6 Summarized Measured, Ind Reserves for SC
ROM Diluted Grades |
|||||||||
Pit |
Description |
ROM Ore (Mt) |
NSR ($/t) |
Cu (%) |
Au (g/t) |
Ag (g/t) |
Mo (%) |
Waste |
Stripping Ratio (t/t) |
P 611 |
South Starter |
297.8 |
16.7 |
0.33 |
0.239 |
1.685 |
0.017 |
241.2 |
0.81 |
P 621i |
South Incremental |
136.1 |
14.3 |
0.266 |
0.207 |
1.509 |
0.018 |
178.6 |
1.31 |
P 631 |
North Starter |
52.9 |
16.2 |
0.291 |
0.185 |
1.94 |
0.024 |
45.4 |
0.86 |
P 641i |
Intermediate |
208.1 |
14.3 |
0.277 |
0.148 |
1.674 |
0.02 |
476.1 |
2.29 |
P 651i |
Final |
125.9 |
18.1 |
0.305 |
0.263 |
2.275 |
0.027 |
601.9 |
4.78 |
Total |
821.1 |
15.9 |
0.299 |
0.211 |
1.76 |
0.02 |
1543.2 |
1.88 |
my calculations...(may be very wrong...)
First scenario: If I adjust these 2008 starter pit grades a bit (upward) for a 130Mt pit mined over 3 years, $3.0 B can be paid off handily (over $300M in the black) in 4 yrs. --- using: 8% discount, 2011 RE metal prices and recoveries, metal selling costs, and these pumped up grades: Cu 0.40%, 0.02% Mo, 0.26 gpt Au, 1.80 gpt Ag.
My pumped up grades are not a huge stretch given our recent drill results and compared to the starter grades in the table above. I kept Moly grade down as its grade doesn't fluctuate much in the table and also our RE grade for Moly. Silver is a wild card given the legacy issues and the increases in the silver grades of recent cores.
Second Scenario: Increasing Capex to $3.8B makes a disproportionate effect on the payback. D@mn discounting! Same pit and numbers, takes us to a payback early in year 5. We will need a bigger pit with these same grades (about 170Mt) to make the same rate of daily production in the first scenario.
Keeping to the 3 yr target for payback... i adjusted grades a bit more upwards to see where the 4th yr drops away..
Third Scenaro: slip Capex down to $3.665 B, increase production to 150 ktpd (decreasing Capex, increasing production) and boost the grades again to the highest (??) ranges: Cu 0.43%, Mo 0.024$, Au 0.30 gpt (that's pretty high for SC!!), Ag 1.95 gpt. I get a mine payback in January/Feb of year 4 (who is counting months!). 165 Mt starter pit with these average grades would be required to meet this production.
These are just straw dog numbers to see how a starter pit needs to look. I think Elmer has a pretty good chance of getting to 3 or 4 years. 3 years is significantly harder to get to than 4 years.
Perhaps delaying some of the larger Capex items to a year or two into the start of production might be a strategy. I 'paid' all of the Capex in the 4 yrs leading to the mine startup with most of the spending weighted to the last 1 and 2 years before production.
Thoughts?