I agree. It's normal when you buy a stock and you're optimistic that it would appreciate in value or why would you buy the stock in the first place.

Pumpers/Bashers likes to supply information and tries to relate that specific information to the stock when it doesn't matter at all.

An example - Pumper would post an article about gold/copper shooting sky high. Or shortage in supply etc. How does it relate to CUU? Not so since management has already stated the price they are going to use in their calcuations for the BFS. Any appreciation in spot prices of the specific metals is somewhat meaningless to the stock itself. Especially when we are not producing any metal at the moment.

Basher would say...taking a page out of Brundall. Why would it jump to $3.50. Your "20%" is worth only so much. This is misleading as it doesn't matter what you think is fair or not. The oldest number we have for Shaft Creek NPV is $2.8 billion. From 2008 to present, Elmer has drilled and updated their RE with a higher grade equivalent. Using an educated guess, it would be stupid to assume that it would not be more than $2.8 billion because why would they do so much work when they cannot provide further economic benefits of Shaft Creek.

What I want to say in the end is that YES to the bashers and pumpers that CUU is not providing us with enough information to value CUU. We only have a limited amount of information we can work on. I've read through that limited amount of information and I accepted the risks of lack of information by investing in CUU. I believe the risk I'm taking would be rewarded later on. Yes that's why I'm optimistic about this stock.