I am trying to decide whether to be irritated by this reply or not. I generally appreciate your posts, Golfyeti, but I get the impression that my post has been completely dismissed. You may not have meant to be condescending but it seems that way. I did say that the only sane option was 75% but that it would be nice to rule out the 40% option that keeps getting mentioned in other posts. To dismiss a discussion about contract options seems very superior. I know that your knowledge here far exceeds mine but I was not aware you were setting the agenda for this discussion board.

'It is not a complicated mathmatical exercise to conclude that Teck won't take any less than 75%, period. Deal of the century.

Lets focus on something else like whether or not Teck buys our 25% or all of CUU and at what price. The end game.'

Like anyone else, you are entitled to ignore a thread if you feel it is irrelevent or contains nothing of interest to you. You don't have to post on every thread.

However, I do look forward to reading your posts (usually!!)

glta

bbay