Exploration potential on a district level?

A few images showing regional Aerial Magnetics (fr: Regional Airborne Magnetic Survey (fig 4, Von Einsiedel, P. Geo, 2008) with the new properties. From the same report (fig 2), I traced regional faults (some more accurately than others!).

I laid CUU's 2011 Aerial Magnetics over the portion that it covers (remember this is 17km x 25km!). Quite tough to see as they have similar colouration and are both resolving the same magnetics.

The tenures are a bit tough to see thru the magnetics and notations but they are underneath.

Some of the more proximal Plutons to SC are shown with "P"s.

Note how Elmer has put BXX's stakes at Dok creek around similar magnetics.

Mess creek is looking quite interesting. Note Paget's poryphry target about 4km from the 5.8gpt Au grab sample in Mess. I think the additions to Mess Creek make it much more viable as an project on its own.

I don't know what to think of the new strips to the very north. The SC Mineralized Trend leads towards that area and there is an Exploration Target near the end of the 2011 Magnetics. Note how the Area of Exploration Interest pinches towards this area and the magnetics shows broad, linear magnetic highs going along our Sept2011 and March 2012 claims.

Note: is it about 47 km from the 5.8gpt Au grab sample at Mess Creek to the most northern extent of our current claims.

Again... I am not a geologist and this probably doesn't mean a thing...DYODD

http://www.flickr.com/photos/60356448@N04/6839096392/in/photostream/lightbox/

Orange lines at DoK show Gossans. Yellow shows geochem/magnetic anomalies.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/60356448@N04/6839096482/in/photostream/lightbox/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/60356448@N04/6839096580/in/photostream/lightbox/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/60356448@N04/6985216825/in/photostream/lightbox/

Lime green line is the proposed SC road.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/60356448@N04/6839096154/in/photostream/lightbox/