Re: I apologize to Jason, he has just responded to my emails. MTS
in response to
by
posted on
Mar 26, 2012 05:13PM
CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)
We should hold them to account but we should be civil about it. Some temper flaring is expected after a debacle like this. But we should also consider the facts as they are and temper our words with an appropriate tone and not indiscriminately attack. Many here don't seem to realize that the clarical error actually reduced the damages to the sp. Someone took a slapping for that. So it's not like the company is out to violate it's charter which is to make money for us. We are right to speak out about the lack of transparity and I think we are owed some sort of explanation other than what I've been told. Ie. It's the contract. If Teck is so confident that they feel they can wait for the FS and take the 120 days and no one will move on us then why not let us report everything? I intend to discuss this with Elmer in more detail. If there is a reason why we can't blow our horn then so be it.