"Could be they are given a chance to accumulate before they let her go."

and

"and now the bid magically inceased hmmmm"

Exactly, this may not be a bad thing. This is how the game is played. The buyers are grabbing the shares, whether Anon or today even Jitney are the suppliers. Td is buying back the shares they gave up a few days ago..

I wonder which broker is hiding behind Anon. Couldn't be Stifel, could it? They have the shares to play with this for the past year. I could see Teck or CIC appointing Stiefel has there controler so the stock doesnt get ridiculously high before the liquid event. That is only about 10 million dollars that they would lay out, which is chicken feed to these guys in the grand scheme of things.

I am not saying it is Stifel, but I am still trying the figure out, who has this amount of shares to supply the buyers. I guess EE doesnt mind the lower prices. He and Elmer are only concerned with the end takeout price. It will only matter as to how many shares we have when the hammer drops.

R