I know people hate waiting, but Elmer does things right the first time around. He did it with the revised RE, our 43-101 is air tight and now includes silver. He's also been doing it with the Feasibility. We already kow it will be a very solid Feasibility because Elmer and the CUU teams are behind it. Management is key. The past delays will have been worth it.

I'll use BGM as an example since it's being talked about these days look what they're saying about their 43-101:

http://www.mining.com/tantamount-to-selective-reporting-analyst-on-barkerville-golds-43-101-20033/

The Northern Miner called Garth Kirkham, chairman of the best practices committee at the Geological Society of Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy, and Petroleum (CIM), who was not sparing in his opinion of the 43-101 that Barkerville Gold Mines (TSX-V:BGM) released on Monday night:

The hundred thousand or so samples that George did not incorporate into the software show a grade of -1 in the database. That means a lack of information on the sample, which often happens because the field geologist did not send the core to be assayed because it was obviously not mineralized.

“It’s not just an error, it’s tantamount to selective reporting,” Kirkham continued. “You can’t just say all those -1s, all the stuff that we didn’t sample, actually is mineralized. If that’s the case then you best substantiate that. And he doesn’t.”