Lletea

Thank you..I think your interpretation of the core interval starting from zero metres is a good one.I did not interpret the statement in that manner.You sway me towards 519m being the length of the visible mineralization in DDH2012CR427.That is what I want to believe,

Incidentally, while I was composing a reply to you, I got 4 email messages saying my posting was a violation.I was surprised (and perturbed).As suggested by Agoracom, I checked the rules.I could not see where my message was (1) profanity (2) derogatory (3) off topic (4) spamming (5) bashing or hyping (6) Cap Lock or !!!!.

I do not know how the system works to ban a post.Obviously, to get 4 email messages, I must have offended many people.I do not know exactly how I offended, but I apologize to all.