Re: A parting message
in response to
by
posted on
Oct 08, 2012 03:02PM
CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)
Webgogs: "...Chappy, you deleted several posts. Should I post his complaint or will you? I think the board should see what he said and you should explain yourself."...
I've been away most of the weekend and come back to this? I deleted several posts? NO, I have not! Forum leaders should check my post in the Forum Leaders's forum where I said 1) HL's should not process their own complaints and 2) should not simply delete posts but process violations so there is a process and rationale behind the actions taken AND a record of who processed what.
If ANYTHING if have undeleted posts LOL! (posts that were simply removed without a complaint filed or anyting). If something is offensive, it should be reported and processed. I have never deleted WG's posts - ever! In fact, I think that only Agora can delete a HL's post. If I had a problem with WG's posts, I would post a debating counter-point or simply skim on past. I haven't even reported a complaint against WG's. Folks should note that claiming to have insider info is one of Agora's 6 sins.
Actually, I just saw Webs post on SAU was moved to the Off Topic Forum. http://agoracom.com/ir/CopperFoxMetals/forums/off-topic/topics/548654-sau-background-in-brief/messages/1728348#message
Fed Up's complaint was made in private and probably should stay there. I processed his complaint as a warning to WG's since it opened up with "F.U" which seemed to be a poorly disguised, and unneccesary double entendre attack. I thought you had thick enough skin to take a 'warning'.
Maybe before firing public broadsides at me, get your facts straight and shoot in the right direction.
I stand on my record.