You need to strike from the list everything that doesn't have to do with the economics of the project.

I don't agree. The location of the mine is very important. The geopolitical risk has become a very important issue this past year.

Golfyeti's comments about the inside ownership being so high and the billionaire funding will also contribute to getting a fair price. It means we can hold out if we don't like the offered price. We can simply wait them out. The Agreement gives them at most 120 days and then they have to make their one-time only decision. We can wait past that date and then take the remaining percentage to the market in general, if need be.

The potential of the area is also very important. I believe the website specifically states that there is value in this potential. A profitable mine isn't going to attract the attention of the big miners unless it is large and can last for decades. Those are the projects that are desirable. So an economically viable project that is small and limited, is not that appealing. Teck, or anyone else, is not going to simply look at the economics and then stop.