Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: 171m tonnes, drills pulled
25
Jan 01, 2013 11:44PM
4
Jan 02, 2013 12:05AM
20
Jan 02, 2013 12:15AM
6
Jan 02, 2013 12:19AM
4
Jan 02, 2013 12:33AM
5
Jan 02, 2013 12:33AM
1
Jan 02, 2013 12:51AM
5
Jan 02, 2013 12:59AM
10
Jan 02, 2013 01:29AM
4
Jan 02, 2013 01:36AM
3
Jan 02, 2013 01:53AM
13
Jan 02, 2013 02:08AM
6
Jan 02, 2013 08:23AM
14
Jan 02, 2013 08:28AM
25
Jan 02, 2013 09:26AM
7
Jan 02, 2013 09:36AM
8
Jan 02, 2013 09:42AM
16
Jan 02, 2013 09:48AM
12
Jan 02, 2013 09:57AM
5
Jan 02, 2013 09:58AM
33
Jan 02, 2013 10:07AM
14
Jan 02, 2013 10:21AM
9
Jan 02, 2013 10:25AM

They could have easily avoided any "clown show" by releasing aerials, MIRA, Titan, infrared reports in the interim and we would have "understood" how critical it would have been to delay the BFS further to include more drilling information to obtain fullest benefit to CUU. Instead, how much value have been added for delaying BFS by 2 years? For the wasted time and dollars spent in 2 years, I know most investors would have been happy with a 6 months delay to improve BFS (which is final sale price of CUU) substantially. We should not have compromised drilling for Teck or anybody. We've spent enough money, and time and should have done it right. How else would we know that whatever agreed upon buyin/out price is "fair" from Teck? Nothing is really fair on a guestimate? We would always wonder IF we had a good deal! Yes, other majors may know its worth (if we had to find another buyer), but still numbers are just guesses. No hard written numbers for valid support. IMO.

16
Jan 02, 2013 12:25PM
7
Jan 02, 2013 12:46PM
3
Jan 02, 2013 12:54PM
8
Jan 02, 2013 01:00PM
2
Jan 02, 2013 01:03PM
5
Jan 02, 2013 01:27PM
5
Jan 02, 2013 01:49PM
2
Jan 02, 2013 01:51PM
2
Jan 02, 2013 01:52PM

Jan 02, 2013 01:54PM
9
Jan 02, 2013 01:55PM
1
Jan 02, 2013 01:57PM
4
Jan 02, 2013 02:03PM
1
Jan 02, 2013 02:08PM
2
Jan 02, 2013 02:15PM
3
Jan 02, 2013 02:15PM
3
Jan 02, 2013 02:22PM
1
Jan 02, 2013 02:27PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply