Re: Show me where bankable and positive...
in response to
by
posted on
Feb 15, 2013 03:06PM
CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)
Let's try and figure out why they put that in there
They preferred a larger mine, 5.5(b)(ii)
If they had a larger, longer life mine, as defined in that paragraph, they were willing to accept lower grades as evidenced by an 8%NPV absolute qualifier, as positive and bankable, for purposes of the agreement
But how about if they had a somewhat smaller mine
Maybe one defined per 5.5(b)(i), but it did not meet the 12%NPV
How about we write a sentence that specifies that even if it did not meet 5.5(b)(ii), the automatic qualifier, Teck could in its sole discretion, elect to deem positive, basically whatever they wanted
Exactly what was written in the agreement, and in my simple mind, why it was....