Since they had been granted a 30 day window, (which I do not agree was provided for in the agreement in our circumstance) to stall, which is the only possible explanation for the invented time, we, and the market need to be put on affirmative notice that the BFS in fact satisfies the stipulations put forth in the agreement and we are in fact 100% owners of the defined Schaft Creek deposit,

You wouldn't think Teck would elect Elmer to the Board of Liard if they intended to be harsh over the contract. I think this logically, but I still worry and would like confirmation that we have passed this point. It almost worries me more hearing the comments from Mike saying Liard isn't so important suddenly...I remember Elmer telling me those Liard shares were going to be worth a great deal of money some day, so why downplay them now?