Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: New buy out / back in pool
1
Mar 17, 2013 12:56PM
2
Mar 17, 2013 01:07PM
6
Mar 17, 2013 01:49PM
6
Mar 17, 2013 02:33PM
24
Mar 17, 2013 03:19PM
1
Mar 17, 2013 09:09PM
5
Mar 17, 2013 10:14PM
2
Mar 18, 2013 01:20AM

Mar 18, 2013 08:48AM
3
Mar 18, 2013 08:51AM
10
Mar 18, 2013 09:18AM
7
Mar 18, 2013 12:09PM
3
Mar 18, 2013 12:13PM
1
Mar 18, 2013 12:14PM
1
Mar 18, 2013 01:55PM
30
Mar 18, 2013 02:52PM
3
Mar 18, 2013 03:15PM
5
Mar 18, 2013 03:20PM
7
Mar 18, 2013 03:49PM
10
Mar 18, 2013 04:08PM
2
Mar 18, 2013 04:11PM
4
Mar 18, 2013 04:26PM
10
Mar 18, 2013 09:57PM

Ya, it's just potential and it's not worth billions but it's not worth 0 either.

There are numerous companies in Northwest BC that have potential. Romios Gold, Paget Resources, Teuton, etc. All of them can be bought for a few million dollars. I don't think the potential will affect the buyout price by a huge amount.

Do you really think that a few infill drills will make them go "let's manage our risk with 20%" to "we should buy the whole thing!"

I'm expecting the $85M will cover more than just a few infill holes. It will allow them to do extensive exploration drilling, additional metallurgical testing, further work on the environmental permits, etc. None of these improvement opportunities can be quantified without spending additional money.

My logic is based on the fact that I don't think we have enough info to make a construction decision yet. Backing in for 20% allows Teck to explore improvement opportunities without committing to construction. Essentially it delays their decision and allows them to improve the project.

16
Mar 19, 2013 12:45AM
6
T2T
Mar 19, 2013 02:04AM
10
Mar 19, 2013 05:33AM
16
Mar 19, 2013 06:49AM
16
Mar 19, 2013 09:29AM
6
Mar 19, 2013 09:36AM
2
Mar 19, 2013 09:43AM
1
Mar 19, 2013 09:47AM
2
Mar 19, 2013 09:59AM
13
Mar 19, 2013 10:08AM
3
Mar 19, 2013 10:11AM
4
Mar 19, 2013 10:16AM
1
Mar 19, 2013 10:21AM
8
Mar 19, 2013 10:31AM
4
Mar 19, 2013 10:40AM
4
Mar 19, 2013 10:43AM
8
Mar 19, 2013 10:50AM
14
Mar 19, 2013 10:52AM
7
Mar 19, 2013 10:55AM

Mar 19, 2013 11:02AM
6
Mar 19, 2013 11:43AM
5
Mar 19, 2013 11:45AM
4
Mar 19, 2013 11:53AM
3
Mar 19, 2013 11:55AM
11
Mar 19, 2013 12:11PM
1
Mar 19, 2013 12:13PM
3
Mar 19, 2013 12:17PM
5
Mar 19, 2013 12:19PM
4
Mar 19, 2013 12:22PM
3
Mar 19, 2013 12:47PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply