Not sure why I am bothering to respond, but whatever.

1)You said the company needs to "come clean" . What, are we negotiation the divying up of some Oreo cookies here? There is so much we dont know/see that it is absurd for you to expect the company to divulge all to you, a non-insider.

2) To state they have "misled" , is dangerous. I notice you did not specify whether it was intentional or not. You may have just covered your butt there.

3) Teck is leaning on CUU? Where does that info come from. someone else's post?

4) "Deception from the company" - good grief. Do you walk around in your perfect little world, with your perfect little spouse and perfect little kids, and perfect job and nothing EVER GOES WRONG? or EVERTHING ALWAYS GOES ACCORDING TO PLAN?

5)Us the shareholders pressuring the company?

ha ha.

The biggest pressure comes from the person who has invested millions in this already. He obviously is content so ask yourself why you arent? one answer: Expectations.

So who here is so naive to think that pulling together a multi-billion dollar regional play doesnt have dynamics and variables that change as things progress? This 'agreement' was written LONG BEFORE we knew what we know today. So, even the so called 'informed' at the time (Salazar) would attest that things can come along (change) and you deal with it as it arises.

My guess is that an agreement was reached some time ago to have CUU play this as quietly as possible without breaking any security laws. Teck has dangled some sort of carrot out there that has made our team (including lawyer) say that this is reasonable and acceptable.

So what is the carrot?

JV for the rest of the property? Something that sets CUU up for Life Beyond SC?

btw, mgmt knows our frustrations and are in the unenviable position of assuaging our fears/concerns while Teck stick handles something behind the scenes.

It will all become so apparent later and we'll understand why Low-Key was the operative phrase management played by.

jmho,

Fire