Agreed, You did get a response but not much meat no? I am guessing you didn't gather any new info out of that exchange that you didn't know already? I mean that with nothing but respect.

http://agoracom.com/ir/CopperFoxMetals/forums/discussion/topics/568032-this-is-new/messages/1786260#message

Ironic that Jason directed Powersurge to one of the CUU webpages that has the one of the references to the 'bankable' concept from "many many years ago' - in 2002 when we drove around in horse drawn carriages - that Mike told Liddy was against the "Security laws"...

..."Mike: The term "bankable" is used in some underlying Agreements, that were drawn up many, many, years ago. It's actually against the Security laws to use the word bankable. We would never use the word bankable other when we are referring to, although we shouldn't be, other than when we are referring to an older document. The reason being, every bank has a different way of figuring out what is a bankable feasibility study, as a result, we refer it as a positive feasibility study. That's how we referred to it when we announced it and we announced that it was completed, was satisfied that we had..."

I imagine that Management wants to make an announcement pretty soon if even for the simple reason that they'd like to stop resorting to these rather silly sounding circular arguments in an apparent effort to hide what they are really doing right now.

As I told someone this AM, CUU management is either rolling up doobies and roasting them down while DM and his wife are investing more and more money or a bigger deal/JV is in the works. I wouldn't be here if I thought the former were the case btw.