Mike's response in red.
"In regards to timeline when will the company:
1)Publish a drilling plan for the 2013 year? We are working on a 2013 program based on a Copper Fox perspective of priorities which are enumerated in the Feasibility Study recommendations. As in past years we have kept Teck up to date with ongoing plans.
Once again Mike did not answer the question. "We are working on a 2013 program" is not an answer. "... kept Teck up to date wth ongoing plans"... what has that got to do with the question of when will the company publish a drilling plan for the 2013 year.
2)Release an update on the overall project of Schaft Creek?An update will be released as information considered material is available.
And who decides what information is considered material? So far, there has been numerous material information that has not been NR to the public, e.g. NR confirming acceptance of BFS from Teck; official start date of 120 days; status of LIard Shares, etc.
3)Update the shareholders of what is occurring between Teck and Copper fox in regards to the discussions?A news release will be disseminated once discussions with Teck are finalized.
Hopefully, no later than June 4, 2013.
4)Explain the direction in which this company will take regarding strategic planning and joint ventures?I am afraid it is too early in the game to get into this area, obviously Copper Fox has plans based on a number of different scenario’s.
How can it be "too early in the game" for strategic planning and joint ventures? Good thing is this time he did not claim to know nothing about a JV. But wouldn't 2013 drilling program, EA application, be part of strategic planning? He could have said that instead of too early in the game...
5) If the company published a "Bankable" feasibility study and if the Laird shares were transferred? The term “Bankable” oft used a few generations’ ago is no longer accepted or encouraged by the regulators of the industry. We completed a Positive feasibility Study.
Once again, complete avoidance regarding the Liard shares transfer.
I don't think Mike's email response provides any more information than we already have. I find his answers very vague and evasive.