If voting people out means that they will get new management then I am all for it. I invested because of Schaft Creek, not Elmer. The market downturn in the juniors means that there should be lots of qualified people out there. My previous post was pointing out how this management likes to bend the rules to suit themselves. This company needs management that works in the best interest of shareholders, not the best interest of themselves. Do they really need two offices? Do they really need 900K dollars in salaries to pay for exploration on 2M dollars in properties? Do they really need a VP, a VP of operations, and a VP of permitting? This management needs to change and that's only going to happen when people stop putting up with their tactics and stop defending them. That $20M in the bank is shareholder's money, not management's.