I did not say TECK would do the NR themselves; EA is material to CUU, so I would think the JV (or CUU) would have to put out an NR stating that TECK has submitted the EA; same goes for the 2014 drill program..
Ya you did,
Dogger,
TECK submitting the EA and their plans for a 2014 drill season would be announced in an offical NR. I do not think YM meant an NR would be issued today. He said that he will post some important info today about CUU that he obtained through his recent DD and research; at least that is how I understood his post.
I see some can't hold back the sneer remarks directed at YM; throwing rocks is the easiest thing to do and for some that is all they are capable of doing. Give YM a chance to come through, then post your comments.
And from what I read of Young money`s post...I did not read that he will post anything or if there would even be a offical NR.
I finally got a response from a very, very, very important and powerful individual after multiple attempts to gain contact and months of waiting for this information! This very powerful person is very relevant and crucial to the Schaft Creek project and overall final judgement call to move Schaft Creek mine into production.
Very exciting for CUU shareholders!!!! The message contains information of great importance but not very detail was revealed to me for obvious reasons.
Thanks
I was looking at this site
http://a100.gov.bc.ca/appsdata/epic/html/deploy/epic_project_home_283.html
I was thinking that the information would be brought here first then a official NR would follow.
Not trying to put anyone down, many times I read too fast and take things out of context. I am just making sure that I am reading this right?
