Who is really twisting words here?

Actually, what I said in full is:

• I said earlier, read the article, it isn't nessasarily negative.
  
  For those who didn't read it, it basically says that the Tahltans demanded greater scrutiny on the tailings dam (which Imperial obliged).
  
  The result was that Red Chris needed to beef up their design (note - can proceed with some changes). To me it seems that the Tahltans are being reasonable, wanting a higher level of safety for their watershed/lands (fair enough after Mt. Polley), but they are not outright saying no to development - even with an operator like Imperial...
  
  Sounds pretty positive for an operator with a good reputation/relationship with the Tahltans? I think so.

There has been some concern about the rouge element of the Tahltan band that was blocking roads and such - this article says they have been brought in line with the Tahltan Council - a good thing, no? I sure think it is...

No, you said; "I thought it was very relevant as it goes to show how the Tahltan's are approaching the development of a mine in their territory."

As far as I am aware, this is the only mine currently proceeding with development - I am missing whatever you are trying to imply here?? That I am saying that we will have to have our ducks in a row environmentally? That they have the rouge element under control? That they will allow us to develop? Yes to all of them.

I would even say it sounds like we agree on this?