Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Teck and Fort Hills

With the current oil price drop, I figure it's a good idea to maybe talk a little bit about their Fort Hills project and perhaps posters here may have some oil sands background to help us.

http://www.teck.com/res/tc/documents/_ces_portal_meta/downloads/investors/ir%20presentations/2014/20141120_goldman_sachs_conference_final.pdf

This is Teck's most recent presentation.

Their potential economics for oil at $100 is around 15% yield from Teck's $2.9 billion capex investment.

$455 million annual pre tax cash flow.

At $100 oil, they have margins of $35. Or 35% margin.

Currently with oil around $70, they are very very close to breaking even.

If you use SC as an example.

SC provides annual $453 million in pre tax cash flow. Divide by capex of $3.2 billion, that yields roughly 14%.

If you look at copper cost margins after by products, SC is at $1.15, if copper stays at $3.00, we have 62% margin.

***I realize the Fort Hills yield is based on during capital recovery period.

If that's the case for SC, first five years of capital recovery is around $3.5 billion. That's roughly $600-700 million a year. Much higher than the average $453 million per year.

I know I'm comparing apples to oranges, but it shows that SC stands alone a very good project. Now if you imagine reducing the capital cost and the payback period, think about how good the numbers will look then?

*I've not accounted for forex changes and metal price changes.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply