I've told you many times before we cannot help you any further if that's the case. Either deal with it, call the office for more information, or sell your position and never think of it again.

------------------------

I was using it as an example to make a point - not to repeat it again. What else could I have used? I wasn't arguing it, simply saying your take on it as being negative is due to your perception, not my intent?

It was a topic of contention and hoped to explain that my concern is only negative if you decide to look at it that way. I'm sure you own shares and so do I. All I said was:

"For example, I have been talking about the need for financial conservation and the consideration of market conditions/timing before further spending. Depending on how you look at that, it can be negative or positive...

To those wanting to spend and explore it is negative as it is contrary to what they would like to see.

To those that see the value in SC proper, and would like the assurance that their long held investment isn't diluted in the future the post may be perceived as a positive post?"

I don't see any hammering on my point in the above post, just a statement that there are two different perceptions on it - and used as an example. I don't know how I could have worded it to tame it down any further? I guess I could have added a third side that 'those who see no funding risk due to other options going forward will see it negative as well', I suppose?

You have no concerns about cash and have given your reasons, and thats discussion. I accept that you believe that strongly, but do we all have to accept that the reasoning you have presented is infalable and couldn't possibly be wrong? Could it not be as easy as proposed? Do we know with any certainty EE will step up? Its one thing to state an opinion, but to dismiss anything else as blatently wrong because you believe you have proven your point isn't reasonable in my opinion.

Some friends of mine who are also investors in CF (but not members here) sent an email last week looking for answers. I asked them around noon if they had a response from the nearly week old email yet, but nothing so far. The questions they asked were pretty tame IMHO. I don't personally give phone info much weight, but you are welcome to weigh it however you like. Been there, done that.

We really won't know till we find out, and I can admit I may be completely wrong. I in no way want to stifel your opinion. You may be right on the money (I hope you are), but it is a hard thing to prove with any certainty IMHO. Its ok to disagree? If not, it should be...

I don't think that post deserved a sell or go away response (I don't think anyone deserves that actually). The whole post was about a completely different topic (whats negative to one person may not be negative to another), and I thought carefully written with the intention to not offend anyone.

I think there are members with a wide range of opinions as the vote showed. Who is going to feel safe to post when people respond like this? More than the same few should join in the conversation...