I realize you may be restricted on what you can share with the shareholders. But will there come a time, despite Teck's objections or support, that you or the SCJV will share all the info that has been collected since the BFS was completed.

 (The only component not reported on is the re-model. See news releases over the past four years.  When the remodel is completed, Copper Fox will issue a news release on the results of the work) 

Five years is a long time to be excluded considering we were the investors that took the risk of the deposit being worthless.  

 (When Copper Fox obtained the option on the project in 2002 it was deemed to have no value.  The work completed by Copper Fox demonstrated that the project had merit and established a considerable value based on the input parameters at the time of the study.  That study demonstrated sufficient merit for Teck to exercise the maximum back in pursuant to the option agreement leading to formation of the SCJV)

I can only think that the reason for secrecy is so Teck can get the best deal, without competing interest, for our shares.    

 ( I do not share agree with your statement. Teck knows that by the terms of the Joint Venture agreement Copper Fox has a carried interest to production. Waiting does not help Teck one bit.  In any event, Copper Fox would have an independent valuation completed before any decision to either accept an offer or agree to sell would be taken. The estimated cost to develop Schaft Creek is measured in $ billions and that is a decision that would not be taken easily given the past five years in the sector) Not something we should support.

Has any effort being made to have another mining company buy out Tecks interest in the project? 

 (Teck would first have to announce that they want to divest their interest in the project before Copper Fox could approach another company.)

thanks

XXXXXXXX

I usually share any info I receive with the Agoracom forum