"...what can He say?"

Dwayner,
My opinion only. Although the SCJV disalllows CUU from making any public statements about SC without the operator's prior approval, under a non-disclosure agreement, CUU Mgmt can privately share information that Teck has officially delivered to the Schaft Creek Joint Venture.   

How much "useful" information that Teck has handed over to the SCJV thus far is anyone guess, but it is safe to assume that it is decidedly short of enough information for CUU to order a 43-101 compliant update.  So CUU Mgmt must convince any suitors of Schaft Creek's truthfull value using a "connect the dots" valuation proposal and sales pitch vs using a properly optimized and updated Feasibility Study.  Obviously not ideal but CUU Magmt must try anyway, imo.  What else can be more important to work on and execute?

JMHO