This is how you properly communicate with shareholders and potential investors. I am assuming you’re interested in attracting new money?

You would be the only ones suggesting they are a good partner. (You are right I did express my opinion, and it still stands, you do not have to agree with me.)

How have you not had discussions about your interest in selling our 25% to Teck? (At what price?  Ernesto made clear at the AGM the interest is for sale at fair value. The project enhancements indicate a strong possibility of adding significant value, what is your rationale for entering a sale process now.)   

Ernesto said ‘Teck is moving fast’ what did he mean? ( I cannot speak for Ernesto. You could have asked him that at the AGM)

You see our share price tank after the agm and continuing? That is your loyal shareholders throwing in the towel with no hope of actually seeing any liquidity events and lost all confidence in mgmt. (It appears that some shareholders were disappointed with the information provided at the AGM, in the PEA valuation, other have a different opinion)

It’s really sad we have supported you with our hard earned money, bought into pp’s, believed what you told us for many years yet nothing you ever commit to or say comes through, and this is how we are treated. (Copper Fox discloses material news when completed. Copper Fox has been working with Teck to increase the value of Schaft Creek and the current PEA demonstrated significant increase in value with the possibility to add significant more value.  I cannot predict in advance the outcome of a individual study or peoples reaction to news releases.  If a shareholder decides to sell their shares or the results are not what was expected, it is the shareholders decision what to do)

To suggest you have no formal plan on liquidating assets other than we need to spend more money and drilling with no defined timeframes and the board has to meet again to make some plan? (Not sure where you are coming from on this comment. I assume, based on a comment you made above that you attended the AGM, if so you must have heard Ernesto comment on the disposition of the 25% Interest in the Schaft Creek project)

This years AGM was particularly deflating with nothing from you giving us any hope.(if adding significant value at Van Dyke and Schaft Creek, moving exploration projects to the drilling stage, acquiring a well mineralized porphyry project in BC is not sufficient for you then not sure what you/shareholders are looking for.)

It’s like your paycheque every two weeks is more important than selling an asset. (Really)

I know you have more shares than I but your actions don’t support what you say. (Yes, I might own more shares that you?   The insiders hold approximately 60% of the shares and have heavily supported the company over the past few years. Actually, the strategy of the company as defined by the board has been implemented with success. Add value get the projects to fair value territory.  It appears that you do not agree with this strategy)

Or is it you don’t have the experience or contacts to open a discussion with a major about our asset? Then go hire someone. (We added depth to the management team with the addition of Mark Brown.  As indicated above, our major shareholder has publicly stated that when Schaft Creek reaches fair value territory it would be put up for sale which would entail engaging independent third party groups when/where necessary to commence/complete a sale process.)

You can’t put all hope in Teck’s hands (Not sure where you got that idea, nothing could be further from the truth. Teck is the operator of Schaft Creek, they own 75% and spending their money) 

it’s your job to be out there promoting us and attracting other majors, this should already be happening with the US assets ( I have set out the strategy of the board and our major shareholders on valuation/timing of asset sale. The same applies to the Van Dyke project.)