At this point, it does make sense to get the meta report.....so we still have to wait.

The way I see it, all this data from 2021,2022, maybe 2023 needs to be wrapped into "change affect" on project economics. What new value was added to the npv based on these project enhancements?

Based on Teck's "preparing a pfs on SC" comments and Elmer's 2022 shareholder letter of "technical certainty necessary to advance these projects to the preliminary feasibility stage"......2023 is a big year! 

It sounds like both companies are aligned to deliver a pfs study in the next SC program update. It doesn't mean we will stay for its conclusion (adds another 2-3 year wait which none of us want) but this "official news" by both JV partners establish Schaft Creek as a next level advancement and would add more value to buyout.
This is what Elmer likely wants! Just for Teck to announce to the world.....SC is a pfs staged asset now. A project further along the mining path does add more value.