In response to anxious emails I sent to Lynn Ball she mentioned that CF needed to get the 2023 studies from Teck to understand the economics before they could promote the project.   (we use the term Meta studies on this forum)    I guess I don't underrstand exactly what the Meta studies really mean. I would of thought analysing the cores of what was brought up with drills would tell them what was available     

Lynn Ball> whether we are knocking on doors, we do need to wait for the results of the 2023 program before moving forward as that information is important to the economics and the confidence of the project.  Once all is received, reviewed, and disseminated the board will be able to assess the next steps forward, no guarantees on whether it would be monitization. 

Does anyone feeling like explaining that to me. Thanks in advance