"Filo is far from being the same project as when the PFS came out.  They hit over 1km of CuEq above 1% later.  Not a good comparaison.

MoneyK"

Funny how sensitive and flippant you get when a totally comparable project suggests that SC is worth way more than you've been suggesting.

IMO SC is already a better and more valuable project than FIlo.  The SC NPV and IRR numbers are based on way lower price assumptions, and Schaft Creek has 50% more mine life and way lower C1 and sustained cost numbers.  

Filo's NPV is based on $3.65 copper and $1,700 gold.  Schaft Creek's NPV is based on $3.25 copper and $1,500 gold. That makes a huge difference too.