Believe it or not EZ I hope your right, for the sake of shareholders. I just see it differently. Yes it doesn't state specifically in the contract 20,000 tpd but that is all that is APPROVED at this point in the feasability and EIS. It seems to me that an arb panel will use info that is binding and signed by both.

40,000 isn't, two 10 year extensions aren't. How can one use these extensions as a valuing tool when nobody has any clue as to what the situation will be in twenty years. Maybe kry would want to walk away from the extensions, or maybe not, who can say? How does one value that?