This whole debate is getting more and more off base.

You are asking for a solution to a hypothetical problem. When you say "ok! so it takes kry an extra 4 weeks to "not be able to operate" where did you get your information?

I can't find any statement from KRY saying they will NOT BE ABLE TO OPERATE at the end of the first quarter. You are making assumptions or have information that I haven't seen in public and asking for Rayzz to give you solutions to you perceived problem.

While your comments were directed at Rayzz I can only talk for myself. It doesn't matter what is said here, none of us have the power to affect the share price. My only reason for even posting on this subject was to try and show that bankruptcy talk was premature based on the facts as I know them.

It is only arguing semantics when talking about weeks or months if we both agree Kry is going bankrupt at the end of the first quarter. Arguing whether Kry will "not be able to operate" at the end of the first quarter is definitely not semantics. It is the whole premise of my posts.

Let me make this very clear. I am saying KRY WILL NOT BE BANKRUPT OR FILE FOR BANKRUPTCY At THE END OF THE FIRST QUARTER! If you or anyone else disagrees then say so as clearly as I did with no caveats. I will also ask the reverse of your question to anyone who believes Kry will be bankrupt at the end of the first quarter and show me why Kry will cease operations at the end of March.