thanks nobear, good digging (i could'nt find it).... i'm still not sure why the af would apply though?

the investments came from vannessa/grz...and they're both from member states

hey vet, you out there? call doug and ask him why the additional facility?

i wonder if it has to do with claiming more than your invested amount....i.e. lost profits?

in any case vannessa has gone on over 5 years (with no end in sight) so it certainly is'nt to "expedite" the case...