Thanx Teutracker.

I can't dispute that $5 surely sounds better, and I magine that would benefit most all the investors.

Personally I would actually be satisified to recover my original investment, even though it's been tied up for 5+ years, but would vote with the majority, if it ever came to that.

For me it's only a few grand (although not exactly chump-change for a pensionado), but I suspect that many have a far greater exposure which would not be easy to offset by buying at these cut-rate prices, IF there is an outcome other than delisting and/or bankruptcy.

Cheers,

SS