I guess I do not understand why the lost profits theory of recovery is constantly questioned when in fact there is no question that it exists as a basis of recovery.

Because almost nobody here understands even basic principles of contract law or international arbitration. Most are overwhelmed by their history with this POS stock and their sunk costs.

I post less because I feel it is a waste of my time, despair seem to rule and information cannot cure that issue. I know that lost profits are very likely here and that collection is a total non-issue, but then I look at this from a different positon, having significant experience in contract disputes and international arbitration.

I could only dream about having Gotanda on a panel where I was representing the claimant with a contract breach with this magnitude of non-speculative future profits that should be so elementary to prove.