I am not disputing or debating RM's info, he has a job to do. Am just throwing out what the SEC actually did, and what it typically means. I am not being sarcastic either. Real Crystallex disclosure comes through a PR to everyone, not just the select few that call IR. Today's PR, the perfect chance to provide additional US shareholder disclosure, mentioned absolutely nothing about US common holders retaining their position or claim, or that shares are fungible in Canada, etc. The big question is: Why?

I was previously mislead by RM, back when the AMEX delisting was purportedly a mistake. Also, it was posted here, on this board, that RM stated the February SEC suspension was a mistake. Now the US common stock has been revoked, and the definition of revoked means something else. Because callers are hearing this from RM? Ok, fine.

Whatever RM is saying, is what he is saying. If it gives hope, then great. I have stated, on numerous occasions, that shares may be fungible in the Canadian exchange. But, it all depends on what the company is willing to do to help US shareholders. Maybe the company will assign US commons some "special" status, who knows. Until a PR diclosure, all rumor.

I believe Crystallex has some 'splainin' to do in a public PR disclosure.