Have received a few PM's about Fung screwing commons by going through Tenor, claims that Reyes is a shill, and there is no hope so why call or e-mail, blah-blah. Maybe there isn't hope, and maybe there is. I am not so sure e-mails or calls to a company answering machine, can change the future of commons. But, maybe real snail-mail letters sent to the judge could work.

Keep in mind, a company is neither shareholders, nor management. Tenor-Crystallex, like all companies, is an entity that exists only on paper and logos on the letterhead and give-away pens and hats. However, the business decisions to keep the company alive are made by management. So, who will the decision makers take care of? Can't blame 'em about taking care of themselves. As previously noted, they are good at making money for themselves, and taking care of themselves.

There has supposedly been complaint posts (on the other board of which we do not speak) about Fung and his choice of Tenor for the most recent funding. There have been a few posts/complaints here. From what I recall of the funding agreement previous to this latest funding, and previously pointed out, Fung was tied into using Tenor for any future funding(s). That agreement gave Tenor approval oversight, for any funding outside of Tenor. Tenor acts all open-minded on the funding in public, but it is pretty obvious that Tenor's talons are sunk deep. Fung could have gone outside Tenor, then jumped through more hoops and waited on whatever approval by Tenor, once he had Tenor's permission. Fung decided on the easy route.

Then there is Reyes. Reyes is, I suppose, a "typical" shareholder in the eyes of the court, and is mind boggling to real shareholders - by always agreeing with the give-aways to Tenor. Not even a peep of concerns for shareholders. Giving the impression that shareholders are "represented." Maybe a shill (probably the wrong word) for Tenor-Crystallex to put up some false front representation and make it easier for the judge to believe shareholders agree with this circus? It is an interesting question and could be speculated many ways. If true, would likely be difficult, if impossible, to prove. But, from the previous shenanigans it would not be much of a surprise if true.

Did anyone notice that Tenor attorneys moved over to Crystallex' attorney, which necessitated Crystallex finding alternate representation? Or, was it just coincidence? Sheesh.

I'll compile the address(es) to write snail-mail letters and post later.