Perhaps the panel dismissed the second 20 year agreement that KRY added into their calculations for loss of revenue. While the deal was for 40 years it was 2 twenty year deals. Kry could have accelerated the first 20 if they knew the second 20 wasn't going to be renewed but given the estimates my guess is the panel agreed with VZ (I assume they argued) that only the first firat 20 should be considered. This would have cut the potential losses. Either way it doesn't matter why we only got 1.386 billion, what matters is how much shareholders end up with.