Yea I'm lazy and have done done anything yet.

About Gowling not getting paid unless they win that's OK.

I havent seen any real details so I guess they have not been announced YET.

About the fee, the original commons litigants and now commons add ons (like me):

Has anyone reasoned that this asking for add on litigants is really just about the Fee? If Gowling said to the original litigants "hey the fee here is XX% or a minimum of $$$...." this could be a big reason to admit some more litigants at this time.

Also the judge might more readily accept the arguments of a large percentage of common share holders rather than just nine or ten. So, is it safe to say Gowling might only need 50% of the commons to show a majority or maybe the shareholders need add-ons to cover the minimum fee?

Who would get paid and in what percentage by the Judge? Just the litigants or anyone still holding Crystallex shares in an account, or only those named in the lawsuit?

HB