I disagree JC.

Paau has asked questions which suggests he looking for advice or why ask if you know the answer.

Understanding the reasons does matter. Paau still hasn't given a clear reason for his differennt opinion. He is entitled to his opinion just like we all are. I do think he has a responsibility to explain his reasons when he tells us in his opinion there are better options than opting in. What are those reasons?      

If his reason is he doesn't like the name Gowling or he doesn't like the hair of one of the lawyers at Gowling then we should know that before weighting his comments. I personally would listen to advise based on suchsilliness but  maybe you would.

Understanding and motives are two things that have plagued this company from the beginning. Had we had a better understanding of that we may not even be having this exchange.

JJ