JC you are overly simplifying what I said.

It matters if the posts contain truth and facts. No one said differently.

Perhaps you don't but I do weight information depending on who posts it.

IMO it only makes sense to value the opinion of a lawyer who is stating legal information over a lay person.

I don't take a lay persons medical advise over a doctor.

That is why even with doctors we go to specialists.

So to break it down for you so there is no confusion. I will add more weight to comments from a lawyer who posts legal comments that a plumber who comments on legal issues. 

On a board such as this it is always important to take everything with a grain of salt. When you say "Does not matter that their message contains truth and facts." you have determined their posts are true based on what? Just because you read it doesn't mean it is true and factual.

I will use you as an example. You post here but you have no shares thus no invested interest in how shareholders make out. I take that into account when I read what you say and what your motives might be for posting. I don't take your comments at face value because you are not in the same boat as the rest of us. That isn't to disregard what you have to say but to put it in context with other posts.

As I said earlier, If Paau is telling the truth and he is a lawyer he should know more about legal issues than I do. That is why I asked where does he practise law and what is his specality. Paau may well be right about some of his legal comments. Whether his comments which have been generally generic are genuine or slanted by his relationship with Tenor is up to each poster to determine.

Could there be a reason for someone associated or employed by Tenor to post here? 

JJ